These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15484591)
1. The Thatcher illusion and face processing in infancy. Bertin E; Bhatt RS Dev Sci; 2004 Sep; 7(4):431-6. PubMed ID: 15484591 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Face processing at birth: a Thatcher illusion study. Leo I; Simion F Dev Sci; 2009 Apr; 12(3):492-8. PubMed ID: 19371374 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Configural features in the context of upright and inverted faces. Leder H; Candrian G; Huber O; Bruce V Perception; 2001; 30(1):73-83. PubMed ID: 11257979 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Spatial-temporal analysis of face processing using an ERP study of the Thatcher illusion. Gu X; Li Y; Yang X; Zhu Y Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2007; 2007():2496-9. PubMed ID: 18002501 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Does face inversion qualitatively change face processing: an eye movement study using a face change detection task. Xu B; Tanaka JW J Vis; 2013 Feb; 13(2):. PubMed ID: 23420421 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Inversion leads to quantitative, not qualitative, changes in face processing. Sekuler AB; Gaspar CM; Gold JM; Bennett PJ Curr Biol; 2004 Mar; 14(5):391-6. PubMed ID: 15028214 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Inversion improves the recognition of facial expression in thatcherized images. Psalta L; Andrews TJ Perception; 2014; 43(8):715-30. PubMed ID: 25549504 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Face configuration affects speech perception: Evidence from a McGurk mismatch negativity study. Eskelund K; MacDonald EN; Andersen TS Neuropsychologia; 2015 Jan; 66():48-54. PubMed ID: 25447378 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Mrs Thatcher and the bikini illusion. Anstis S Perception; 2009; 38(6):923-6; discussion 931-2. PubMed ID: 19806991 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Thatcher illusion as a test of configural disruption. Lewis MB; Johnston RA Perception; 1997; 26(2):225-7. PubMed ID: 9274755 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Orientation-sensitivity to facial features explains the Thatcher illusion. Psalta L; Young AW; Thompson P; Andrews TJ J Vis; 2014 Oct; 14(12):. PubMed ID: 25301017 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Neural Correlate of the Thatcher Face Illusion in a Monkey Face-Selective Patch. Taubert J; Van Belle G; Vanduffel W; Rossion B; Vogels R J Neurosci; 2015 Jul; 35(27):9872-8. PubMed ID: 26156988 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The Thatcher illusion reveals orientation dependence in brain regions involved in processing facial expressions. Psalta L; Young AW; Thompson P; Andrews TJ Psychol Sci; 2014 Jan; 25(1):128-36. PubMed ID: 24264941 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The role of configurality in the Thatcher illusion: an ERP study. Mestry N; Menneer T; Wenger MJ; Benikos N; McCarthy RA; Donnelly N Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Apr; 22(2):445-52. PubMed ID: 25102929 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The role of perceptual processing in the oddball effect revealed by the Thatcher illusion. Sarodo A; Yamamoto K; Watanabe K Vision Res; 2024 Jul; 220():108399. PubMed ID: 38603924 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Thatcher illusion: rotating the viewer instead of the picture. Lobmaier JS; Mast FW Perception; 2007; 36(4):537-46. PubMed ID: 17564200 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The development of expert face processing: are infants sensitive to normal differences in second-order relational information? Hayden A; Bhatt RS; Reed A; Corbly CR; Joseph JE J Exp Child Psychol; 2007 Jun; 97(2):85-98. PubMed ID: 17339043 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Thatcher's Britain: a new take on an old illusion. Johnston P; Baker DH; Stone R; Kaufman J Perception; 2014; 43(12):1400-3. PubMed ID: 25669056 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]