567 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15484653)
1. Change in the process for organizations in which their survey reports meet a rule for conditional accreditation or preliminary denial of accreditation decision.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2004 Sep; 24(9):7. PubMed ID: 15484653
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. APPROVED: Decision rule for a preliminary denial of accreditation eliminated.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2009 Dec; 29(12):4. PubMed ID: 20698087
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. 2005 thresholds for Conditional Accreditation and Preliminary Denial of Accreditation.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2004 Nov; 24(11):3. PubMed ID: 15587168
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. 2007 thresholds for Conditional Accreditation and Preliminary Denial of Accreditation.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2006 Dec; 26(12):1, 3. PubMed ID: 17439073
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. APPROVED: New preliminary denial of accreditation process.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2009 Dec; 29(12):7. PubMed ID: 20698090
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Revision: accreditation decision rule PDA04.
Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations
Jt Comm Perspect; 2007 Apr; 27(4):5. PubMed ID: 17472126
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. An assessment of accreditation with contingencies and the three-year award cycle.
Ente BH
QRB Qual Rev Bull; 1985 Mar; 11(3):93-6. PubMed ID: 3921895
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. REVISED: Accreditation with Follow-up Survey and Preliminary Denial of Accreditation Decision Processes for Organizations Undergoing Resurvey.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2015 Mar; 35(3):1, 3, 5. PubMed ID: 26427283
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. 2008 accreditation decision rules for all programs.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2007 Aug; 27(8):3-9. PubMed ID: 17953314
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. JCAHO, unannounced: just-surveyed organizations share compliance tips.
Hosp Peer Rev; 2006 Apr; 31(4):45-9. PubMed ID: 16617920
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Accreditation Committee keeps tabs on important accreditation issues.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2002 Dec; 22(12):8-9. PubMed ID: 12506452
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. On-site survey brings Shared Vision-New Pathways to the heart of health care organizations.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2004 Jan; 24(1):11-3. PubMed ID: 14746094
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Exploring improvements in the accreditation process.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2000; 20(5):14. PubMed ID: 11147541
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Modifications to the Periodic Performance Review Acreditation Participation Requirement.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2004 Sep; 24(9):1, 3. PubMed ID: 15484651
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Unannounced survey process on track for full implementation in 2006.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2005 Jan; 25(1):6-7. PubMed ID: 16515353
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Approved: elimination of one-year follow-up survey for certain organizations new to the accreditation/certification process.
Joint Commission
Jt Comm Perspect; 2008 Dec; 28(12):10. PubMed ID: 19186445
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. 2009 accreditation decision rules.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2008 Aug; 28(8):13-9. PubMed ID: 18798365
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Frequently asked questions about the unannounced survey process.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2005 Sep; 25(9):1, 3. PubMed ID: 16515347
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. JCAHO's new accreditation process.
Siegel S
Health Care Law Mon; 2003 Nov; ():4-11. PubMed ID: 14651075
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. APPROVED: an extension for extension surveys.
Joint Commission
Jt Comm Perspect; 2009 May; 29(5):8. PubMed ID: 19845208
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
