These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
567 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15484653)
1. Change in the process for organizations in which their survey reports meet a rule for conditional accreditation or preliminary denial of accreditation decision. Jt Comm Perspect; 2004 Sep; 24(9):7. PubMed ID: 15484653 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. APPROVED: Decision rule for a preliminary denial of accreditation eliminated. Jt Comm Perspect; 2009 Dec; 29(12):4. PubMed ID: 20698087 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. 2005 thresholds for Conditional Accreditation and Preliminary Denial of Accreditation. Jt Comm Perspect; 2004 Nov; 24(11):3. PubMed ID: 15587168 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. 2007 thresholds for Conditional Accreditation and Preliminary Denial of Accreditation. Jt Comm Perspect; 2006 Dec; 26(12):1, 3. PubMed ID: 17439073 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. APPROVED: New preliminary denial of accreditation process. Jt Comm Perspect; 2009 Dec; 29(12):7. PubMed ID: 20698090 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Revision: accreditation decision rule PDA04. Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations Jt Comm Perspect; 2007 Apr; 27(4):5. PubMed ID: 17472126 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. An assessment of accreditation with contingencies and the three-year award cycle. Ente BH QRB Qual Rev Bull; 1985 Mar; 11(3):93-6. PubMed ID: 3921895 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. REVISED: Accreditation with Follow-up Survey and Preliminary Denial of Accreditation Decision Processes for Organizations Undergoing Resurvey. Jt Comm Perspect; 2015 Mar; 35(3):1, 3, 5. PubMed ID: 26427283 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. 2008 accreditation decision rules for all programs. Jt Comm Perspect; 2007 Aug; 27(8):3-9. PubMed ID: 17953314 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Accreditation Committee keeps tabs on important accreditation issues. Jt Comm Perspect; 2002 Dec; 22(12):8-9. PubMed ID: 12506452 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. On-site survey brings Shared Vision-New Pathways to the heart of health care organizations. Jt Comm Perspect; 2004 Jan; 24(1):11-3. PubMed ID: 14746094 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Exploring improvements in the accreditation process. Jt Comm Perspect; 2000; 20(5):14. PubMed ID: 11147541 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Modifications to the Periodic Performance Review Acreditation Participation Requirement. Jt Comm Perspect; 2004 Sep; 24(9):1, 3. PubMed ID: 15484651 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Unannounced survey process on track for full implementation in 2006. Jt Comm Perspect; 2005 Jan; 25(1):6-7. PubMed ID: 16515353 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Approved: elimination of one-year follow-up survey for certain organizations new to the accreditation/certification process. Joint Commission Jt Comm Perspect; 2008 Dec; 28(12):10. PubMed ID: 19186445 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. 2009 accreditation decision rules. Jt Comm Perspect; 2008 Aug; 28(8):13-9. PubMed ID: 18798365 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Frequently asked questions about the unannounced survey process. Jt Comm Perspect; 2005 Sep; 25(9):1, 3. PubMed ID: 16515347 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. JCAHO's new accreditation process. Siegel S Health Care Law Mon; 2003 Nov; ():4-11. PubMed ID: 14651075 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. APPROVED: an extension for extension surveys. Joint Commission Jt Comm Perspect; 2009 May; 29(5):8. PubMed ID: 19845208 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]