263 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15484654)
1. Comparison of the full Periodic Performance Review (PPR), Option 1, Option 2, and Option 3.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2004 Sep; 24(9):8-9. PubMed ID: 15484654
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Using the periodic performance review as a continuous standards compliance tool.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2005 Jan; 25(1):1, 3. PubMed ID: 16515352
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. JCAHO offers two alternative ways to fulfill the periodic performance review.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2003 Oct; 23(10):1-5. PubMed ID: 14582373
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Quality managers: periodic performance review can be a powerful quality tool. Don't hesitate to put your processes under the microscope.
Hosp Peer Rev; 2004 Aug; 29(8):105-8. PubMed ID: 15338822
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. How SII may affect your PPR.
Joint Commission
Jt Comm Perspect; 2008 Oct; 28(10):1, 3. PubMed ID: 19133597
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Unannounced survey process on track for full implementation in 2006.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2005 Jan; 25(1):6-7. PubMed ID: 16515353
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Modifications to the Periodic Performance Review Acreditation Participation Requirement.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2004 Sep; 24(9):1, 3. PubMed ID: 15484651
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Change in review of sentinel events during on-site surveys.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2004 Nov; 24(11):4. PubMed ID: 15587169
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. JCAHO, unannounced: just-surveyed organizations share compliance tips.
Hosp Peer Rev; 2006 Apr; 31(4):45-9. PubMed ID: 16617920
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. What to know about JCAHO. Joint Commission survey process changing this year.
McLaughlin S
Health Facil Manage; 2006 Mar; 19(3):35-7. PubMed ID: 16594493
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Accreditation decision process supports continuous operational improvement.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2004 Jan; 24(1):17-20. PubMed ID: 14746097
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Periodic performance review key to continuous provision of high-quality care.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2004 Jan; 24(1):7-10. PubMed ID: 14746093
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. JCAHO's new accreditation process.
Siegel S
Health Care Law Mon; 2003 Nov; ():4-11. PubMed ID: 14651075
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Should you submit your PPR results to JCAHO? Take the opportunity to obtain valuable feedback.
Hosp Peer Rev; 2004 Aug; 29(8):108-10. PubMed ID: 15338823
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Sample sizes set for organization assessment of compliance.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2003 Oct; 23(10):9-10. PubMed ID: 14582376
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Update on ORYX: the next evolution in accreditation.
Jt Comm Perspect; 1997; 17(5):15-30. PubMed ID: 10182300
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Pilot surveys put new process to the test.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2004 Jan; 24(1):14-5. PubMed ID: 14746095
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. On-site survey brings Shared Vision-New Pathways to the heart of health care organizations.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2004 Jan; 24(1):11-3. PubMed ID: 14746094
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Selected surveys to include random "off shift" visits this year.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2000; 20(2):7. PubMed ID: 11183162
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Frequently asked questions about the unannounced survey process.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2005 Sep; 25(9):1, 3. PubMed ID: 16515347
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
