206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15484745)
1. Comparison of field olfactometers in a controlled chamber using hydrogen sulfide as the test odorant.
McGinley MA; McGinley CM
Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(4):75-82. PubMed ID: 15484745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Ambient odour testing of concentrated animal feeding operations using field and laboratory olfactometers.
Newby BD; McGinley MA
Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(4):109-14. PubMed ID: 15484749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Evaluation of methods for monitoring air concentrations of hydrogen sulfide].
Janoszka K; Wziatek A; Gromiec JP
Med Pr; 2013; 64(3):449-54. PubMed ID: 24261256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. H2S, VOC, TOC, electronic noses and odour concentration: use and comparison of different parameters for emission measurement on air treatment systems.
Franke W; Frechen FB; Giebel S
Water Sci Technol; 2009; 59(9):1721-6. PubMed ID: 19448306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of different measurement methods of odour and odorants used in the odour impact assessment of wastewater treatment plants in Poland.
Barczak RJ; Kulig A
Water Sci Technol; 2017 Feb; 75(3-4):944-951. PubMed ID: 28234294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prioritisation of odorants emitted from sewers using odour activity values.
Sivret EC; Wang B; Parcsi G; Stuetz RM
Water Res; 2016 Jan; 88():308-321. PubMed ID: 26512809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Quality assured measurements of animal building emissions: odor concentrations.
Jacobson LD; Hetchler BP; Schmidt DR; Nicolai RE; Heber AJ; Ni JQ; Hoff SJ; Koziel JA; Zhang Y; Beasley DB; Parker DB
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2008 Jun; 58(6):806-11. PubMed ID: 18581810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dispersion modeling of odour, gases, and respirable dust using AERMOD for poultry and dairy barns in the Canadian Prairies.
Huang D; Guo H
Sci Total Environ; 2019 Nov; 690():620-628. PubMed ID: 31301502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dynamic flux chamber measurements of hydrogen sulfide emission rate from a quiescent surface--A computational evaluation.
Prata AA; Santos JM; Beghi SP; Fernandes IF; Vom Marttens LL; Pereira Neto LI; Martins RS; Reis NC; Stuetz RM
Chemosphere; 2016 Mar; 146():426-34. PubMed ID: 26741548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Development and application of a sensitive method to determine concentrations of acrolein and other carbonyls in ambient air.
Cahill TM; Charles MJ; Seaman VY;
Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2010 May; (149):3-46. PubMed ID: 20608023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of a novel passive sampling technique for monitoring volcanogenic hydrogen sulfide.
Horwell CJ; Allen AG; Mather TA; Patterson JE
J Environ Monit; 2004 Jul; 6(7):630-5. PubMed ID: 15237295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Application of Chemical Sensors and Olfactometry Method in Ecological Audits of Degraded Areas.
Kulig A; Szyłak-Szydłowski M; Wiśniewska M
Sensors (Basel); 2021 Sep; 21(18):. PubMed ID: 34577395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Sensor arrays: an inspired idea or an objective measurement of environmental odours?
Stuetz RM; Nicolas J
Water Sci Technol; 2001; 44(9):53-8. PubMed ID: 11762483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Monitoring of biological odour filtration in closed environments with olfactometry and an electronic nose.
Willers H; de Gijsel P; Ogink N; D'Amico A; Martinelli E; Di Natale C; van Ras N; van der Waarde J
Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(4):93-100. PubMed ID: 15484747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The averaging effect of odorant mixing as determined by air dilution sensory tests: a case study on reduced sulfur compounds.
Kim KH
Sensors (Basel); 2011; 11(2):1405-17. PubMed ID: 22319360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Development of an odorant emission model for sewage treatment works.
Gostelow P; Parsons SA; Cobb J
Water Sci Technol; 2001; 44(9):181-8. PubMed ID: 11762460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Hydrogen sulphide removal by activated sludge diffusion.
Barbosa VL; Dufol D; Callan JL; Sneath R; Stuetz RM
Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(4):199-205. PubMed ID: 15484762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Hydrogen sulfide flux measurements from construction and demolition debris (C&D) landfills.
Eun S; Reinhart DR; Cooper CD; Townsend TG; Faour A
Waste Manag; 2007; 27(2):220-7. PubMed ID: 16540305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Odour emission characteristics of 22 recreational rivers in Nanjing.
Wan Y; Ruan X; Wang X; Ma Q; Lu X
Environ Monit Assess; 2014 Oct; 186(10):6061-81. PubMed ID: 24939710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of two dynamic measurement methods of odor and odorant emission rates from freshly dewatered biosolids.
Wang T; Sattayatewa C; Venkatesan D; Noll KE; Pagilla KR; Moschandreas DJ
J Environ Monit; 2011 Jun; 13(6):1746-52. PubMed ID: 21552636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
