These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15485128)

  • 1. Frequency discrimination thresholds: the effect of increment versus decrement detection of frequency.
    Kishon-Rabin L; Roth DA; Van Dijk B; Yinon T; Amir O
    J Basic Clin Physiol Pharmacol; 2004; 15(1-2):29-40. PubMed ID: 15485128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pitch discrimination: are professional musicians better than non-musicians?
    Kishon-Rabin L; Amir O; Vexler Y; Zaltz Y
    J Basic Clin Physiol Pharmacol; 2001; 12(2 Suppl):125-43. PubMed ID: 11605682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Loudness perception and frequency discrimination in subjects with steeply sloping hearing loss: possible correlates of neural plasticity.
    McDermott HJ; Lech M; Kornblum MS; Irvine DR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Oct; 104(4):2314-25. PubMed ID: 10491696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Frequency discrimination training: is there ear symmetry?
    Roth DA; Avrahami T; Sabo Y; Kishon-Rabin L
    J Basic Clin Physiol Pharmacol; 2004; 15(1-2):15-27. PubMed ID: 15485127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Frequency discrimination at 1200 Hz in the presence of high-frequency masking noise.
    Nelson DA; Stanton ME
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1982 Mar; 71(3):660-4. PubMed ID: 7085971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Pitch discrimination and phase sensitivity in young and elderly subjects and its relationship to frequency selectivity.
    Moore BC; Peters RW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 May; 91(5):2881-93. PubMed ID: 1629481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Detection of increments and decrements in sinusoids as a function of frequency, increment, and decrement duration and pedestal duration.
    Moore BC; Peters RW; Kohlrausch A; van de Par S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 Nov; 102(5 Pt 1):2954-65. PubMed ID: 9373982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Generalization to untrained conditions following training with identical stimuli.
    Roth DA; Appelbaum M; Milo C; Kishon-Rabin L
    J Basic Clin Physiol Pharmacol; 2008; 19(3-4):223-36. PubMed ID: 19025033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Nonlinear explanation for bone-conducted ultrasonic hearing.
    Fujimoto K; Nakagawa S; Tonoike M
    Hear Res; 2005 Jun; 204(1-2):210-5. PubMed ID: 15925206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Using a combination of click- and tone burst-evoked auditory brain stem response measurements to estimate pure-tone thresholds.
    Gorga MP; Johnson TA; Kaminski JR; Beauchaine KL; Garner CA; Neely ST
    Ear Hear; 2006 Feb; 27(1):60-74. PubMed ID: 16446565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Characterizing the dependence of pure-tone frequency difference limens on frequency, duration, and level.
    Micheyl C; Xiao L; Oxenham AJ
    Hear Res; 2012 Oct; 292(1-2):1-13. PubMed ID: 22841571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [The estimation of behavioral audiograms, auditory brainstem response (ABR) thresholds and auditory steady-state response (ASSR) thresholds of young adults with normal hearing].
    Szymańska A; Gryczyński M; Pajor A
    Otolaryngol Pol; 2008; 62(6):735-9. PubMed ID: 19205522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Frequency discrimination in listeners with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Simon HJ; Yund EW
    Ear Hear; 1993 Jun; 14(3):190-201. PubMed ID: 8344476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. How specific is the learning in an auditory frequency discrimination task?
    Zaltz Y; Ari-Even Roth D; Kishon-Rabin L
    J Basic Clin Physiol Pharmacol; 2011 Sep; 22(3):69-73. PubMed ID: 22865365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Acoustic echoplanar scanner noise and pure tone hearing thresholds: the effects of sequence repetition times and acoustic noise rates.
    Ulmer JL; Biswal BB; Mark LP; Mathews VP; Prost RW; Millen SJ; Garman JN; Horzewski D
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1998; 22(3):480-6. PubMed ID: 9606392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Frequency discrimination of short- versus long-duration tones by normal and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Freyman RL; Nelson DA
    J Speech Hear Res; 1987 Mar; 30(1):28-36. PubMed ID: 3560895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Functional MR of the primary auditory cortex: an analysis of pure tone activation and tone discrimination.
    Strainer JC; Ulmer JL; Yetkin FZ; Haughton VM; Daniels DL; Millen SJ
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 1997 Apr; 18(4):601-10. PubMed ID: 9127019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The relationship between stream segregation and frequency discrimination in normally hearing and hearing-impaired subjects.
    Rose MM; Moore BC
    Hear Res; 2005 Jun; 204(1-2):16-28. PubMed ID: 15925188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Learning in discrimination of frequency or modulation rate: generalization to fundamental frequency discrimination.
    Grimault N; Micheyl C; Carlyon RP; Bacon SP; Collet L
    Hear Res; 2003 Oct; 184(1-2):41-50. PubMed ID: 14553902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Spectral-peak selection in spectral-shape discrimination by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Lentz JJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Aug; 120(2):945-56. PubMed ID: 16938982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.