These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15485129)

  • 1. Are the perceptual effects of spectral smearing influenced by speaker gender?
    Kishon-Rabin L; Patael S; Menahemi M; Amir N
    J Basic Clin Physiol Pharmacol; 2004; 15(1-2):41-55. PubMed ID: 15485129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of spectral smearing on phoneme and word recognition.
    Boothroyd A; Mulhearn B; Gong J; Ostroff J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Sep; 100(3):1807-18. PubMed ID: 8817914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of spectral envelope smearing on speech reception. I.
    ter Keurs M; Festen JM; Plomp R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 May; 91(5):2872-80. PubMed ID: 1629480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Perception of vowels and prosody by cochlear implant recipients in noise.
    Van Zyl M; Hanekom JJ
    J Commun Disord; 2013; 46(5-6):449-64. PubMed ID: 24157128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of temporal envelope smearing on speech reception.
    Drullman R; Festen JM; Plomp R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Feb; 95(2):1053-64. PubMed ID: 8132899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The relative contributions of speaking fundamental frequency and formant frequencies to gender identification based on isolated vowels.
    Gelfer MP; Mikos VA
    J Voice; 2005 Dec; 19(4):544-54. PubMed ID: 16301101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sensorimotor adaptation to feedback perturbations of vowel acoustics and its relation to perception.
    Villacorta VM; Perkell JS; Guenther FH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Oct; 122(4):2306-19. PubMed ID: 17902866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of spectral envelope smearing on speech reception. II.
    ter Keurs M; Festen JM; Plomp R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Mar; 93(3):1547-52. PubMed ID: 8473608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Audibility of American English vowels produced by English-, Chinese-, and Korean-native speakers in long-term speech-shaped noise.
    Liu C; Jin SH
    Hear Res; 2011 Dec; 282(1-2):49-55. PubMed ID: 21920420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Gender recognition from speech. Part II: Fine analysis.
    Childers DG; Wu K
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Oct; 90(4 Pt 1):1841-56. PubMed ID: 1755877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Word recognition for temporally and spectrally distorted materials: the effects of age and hearing loss.
    Smith SL; Pichora-Fuller MK; Wilson RH; Macdonald EN
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):349-66. PubMed ID: 22343546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Human Frequency Following Responses to Vocoded Speech.
    Ananthakrishnan S; Luo X; Krishnan A
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(5):e256-e267. PubMed ID: 28362674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The relative importance of spectral cues for vowel recognition in severe noise.
    Swanepoel R; Oosthuizen DJ; Hanekom JJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Oct; 132(4):2652-62. PubMed ID: 23039458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Perception of the [m]-[n] distinction in consonant-vowel (CV) and vowel-consonant (VC) syllables produced by child and adult talkers.
    Ohde RN; Haley KL; Barnes CW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Mar; 119(3):1697-711. PubMed ID: 16583913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Measuring the effects of spectral smearing and enhancement on speech recognition in noise for adults and children.
    Nittrouer S; Tarr E; Wucinich T; Moberly AC; Lowenstein JH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Apr; 137(4):2004-14. PubMed ID: 25920851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sentence intelligibility during segmental interruption and masking by speech-modulated noise: Effects of age and hearing loss.
    Fogerty D; Ahlstrom JB; Bologna WJ; Dubno JR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jun; 137(6):3487-501. PubMed ID: 26093436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of spectral smearing and temporal fine structure degradation on speech masking release.
    Gnansia D; Péan V; Meyer B; Lorenzi C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Jun; 125(6):4023-33. PubMed ID: 19507983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of signal bandwidth and noise on individual speaker identification.
    Schwartz JC; Whyte AT; Al-Nuaimi M; Donai JJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Nov; 144(5):EL447. PubMed ID: 30522302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of vocal effort on spectral properties of vowels.
    Liénard JS; Di Benedetto MG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Jul; 106(1):411-22. PubMed ID: 10420631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Preliminary evaluation of a formant enhancement algorithm on the perception of speech in noise for normally hearing listeners.
    Alcántara JI; Dooley GJ; Blamey PJ; Seligman PM
    Audiology; 1994; 33(1):15-27. PubMed ID: 8129677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.