329 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15485167)
1. Current trends in implantology: Part 1--Biological response, implant stability, and implant design.
Saadoun AP; Le Gall MG; Touati B
Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2004 Aug; 16(7):529-35; quiz 536, 521. PubMed ID: 15485167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Factors influencing marginal tissue remodeling around implants.
Rompen E; Touati B; Van Dooren E
Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2003; 15(10):754-7, 759, 761. PubMed ID: 14969212
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Bone density and primary stability in implant therapy.
Molly L
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Oct; 17 Suppl 2():124-35. PubMed ID: 16968388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Bone quality and the immediate loading of implants-critical aspects based on literature, research, and clinical experience.
Romanos GE
Implant Dent; 2009 Jun; 18(3):203-9. PubMed ID: 19509530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Factors associated with early and late failure of dental implants.
Sakka S; Baroudi K; Nassani MZ
J Investig Clin Dent; 2012 Nov; 3(4):258-61. PubMed ID: 22927130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Influence of forces on peri-implant bone.
Isidor F
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Oct; 17 Suppl 2():8-18. PubMed ID: 16968378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. AICRG, Part II: Crestal bone loss associated with the Ankylos implant: loading to 36 months.
Chou CT; Morris HF; Ochi S; Walker L; DesRosiers D
J Oral Implantol; 2004; 30(3):134-43. PubMed ID: 15255390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Marginal bone stability using 3 different flap approaches for alveolar split expansion for dental implants: a 1-year clinical study.
Jensen OT; Cullum DR; Baer D
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Sep; 67(9):1921-30. PubMed ID: 19686930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Influence of implant geometry on primary insertion stability and simulated peri-implant bone loss: an in vitro study using resonance frequency analysis and damping capacity assessment.
Lachmann S; Laval JY; Axmann D; Weber H
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(2):347-55. PubMed ID: 21483888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical outcome of 802 immediately loaded 2-stage submerged implants with a new grit-blasted and acid-etched surface: 12-month follow-up.
Degidi M; Piattelli A; Gehrke P; Carinci F
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(5):763-8. PubMed ID: 17066638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Primary stability of turned and acid-etched screw-type implants: a removal torque and histomorphometric study in rabbits.
Fernandes Ede L; Unikowski IL; Teixeira ER; da Costa NP; Shinkai RS
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(6):886-92. PubMed ID: 18271369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Resonance frequency measurements in vivo and related surface properties of magnesium-incorporated, micropatterned and magnesium-incorporated TiUnite, Osseotite, SLA and TiOblast implants.
Sul YT; Jönsson J; Yoon GS; Johansson C
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Oct; 20(10):1146-55. PubMed ID: 19719742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Influence of the surgical technique and surface roughness on the primary stability of an implant in artificial bone with a density equivalent to maxillary bone: a laboratory study.
Tabassum A; Meijer GJ; Wolke JG; Jansen JA
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Apr; 20(4):327-32. PubMed ID: 19298286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Retrieval analysis on dental implants biointegration phases.
Ciocan LT; Miculescu F; Miculescu M; Pătraşcu I
Rom J Morphol Embryol; 2010; 51(1):117-22. PubMed ID: 20191130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Relationship between implant stability measured by resonance frequency analysis (RFA) and bone loss during early healing period.
Yang SM; Shin SY; Kye SB
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Feb; 105(2):e12-9. PubMed ID: 18230372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Relationship between dental implant stability determined by resonance frequency analysis measurements and peri-implant vertical defects: an in vitro study.
Tözüm TF; Turkyilmaz I; McGlumphy EA
J Oral Rehabil; 2008 Oct; 35(10):739-44. PubMed ID: 18422511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Ankylos implant system: concept and clinical application.
Nentwig GH
J Oral Implantol; 2004; 30(3):171-7. PubMed ID: 15255394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the effect of different bone quality on stress distribution in an implant-supported crown.
Sevimay M; Turhan F; Kiliçarslan MA; Eskitascioglu G
J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Mar; 93(3):227-34. PubMed ID: 15775923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Current trends in implantology: part II--treatment planning, aesthetic considerations, and tissue regeneration.
Saadoun AP; Le Gall MG; Touati B
Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2004; 16(10):707-14; quiz 716. PubMed ID: 15739910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Influence of the 3-D bone-to-implant relationship on esthetics.
Grunder U; Gracis S; Capelli M
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2005 Apr; 25(2):113-9. PubMed ID: 15839587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
