142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1548600)
1. Preliminary impression in patients with microstomia.
Moghadam BK
J Prosthet Dent; 1992 Jan; 67(1):23-5. PubMed ID: 1548600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prosthetic rehabilitation for a patient with microstomia: a clinical report.
Benetti R; Zupi A; Toffanin A
J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Oct; 92(4):322-7. PubMed ID: 15507903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Technique for making flexible impression trays for the microstomic patient.
Whitsitt JA; Battle LW
J Prosthet Dent; 1984 Oct; 52(4):608-9. PubMed ID: 6389845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Impression procedure for a progressive sclerosis patient: a clinical report.
Dhanasomboon S; Kiatsiriroj K
J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Mar; 83(3):279-82. PubMed ID: 10709034
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The influence of impression trays on the accuracy of stone casts poured from irreversible hydrocolloid impressions.
Mendez AJ
J Prosthet Dent; 1985 Sep; 54(3):383-8. PubMed ID: 3906093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dimensional accuracy of dental casts: influence of tray material, impression material, and time.
Thongthammachat S; Moore BK; Barco MT; Hovijitra S; Brown DT; Andres CJ
J Prosthodont; 2002 Jun; 11(2):98-108. PubMed ID: 12087547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effect of tray selection, viscosity of impression material, and sequence of pour on the accuracy of dies made from dual-arch impressions.
Ceyhan JA; Johnson GH; Lepe X
J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Aug; 90(2):143-9. PubMed ID: 12886207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Custom sectional impression trays with interlocking type handle for microstomia patients.
Fernandes AS; Mascarenhas K; Aras MA
Indian J Dent Res; 2009; 20(3):370-3. PubMed ID: 19884726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Fabrication of a sectional impression tray and sectional complete denture for a patient with microstomia and trismus: a clinical report.
Cura C; Cotert HS; User A
J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Jun; 89(6):540-3. PubMed ID: 12815346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Impression technique for partially edentulous patients.
Nissan J; Barnea E; Krauze E; Assif D
J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Jul; 88(1):103-4. PubMed ID: 12239486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prosthetic Rehabilitation of an Edentulous Patient with Microstomia Using Both Digital and Conventional Techniques: A Clinical Report.
Saygılı S; Geckili O; Sulun T
J Prosthodont; 2019 Jun; 28(5):488-492. PubMed ID: 30945384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A new procedure for separating the edentulous distal extension portion from the master cast when an altered cast is made.
Ansari IH
J Prosthet Dent; 1994 Dec; 72(6):666-9. PubMed ID: 7853267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Accuracy of open tray implant impressions: an in vitro comparison of stock versus custom trays.
Burns J; Palmer R; Howe L; Wilson R
J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Mar; 89(3):250-5. PubMed ID: 12644799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A sectional stock tray system for making impressions.
Ohkubo C; Ohkubo C; Hosoi T; Kurtz KS
J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Aug; 90(2):201-4. PubMed ID: 12886215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Selective-pressure single impression procedure for tooth-mucosa-supported removable partial dentures.
Dumbrigue HB; Esquivel JF
J Prosthet Dent; 1998 Aug; 80(2):259-61. PubMed ID: 9710833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A boxing procedure for corrected cast impressions.
Ansari IH
J Prosthet Dent; 1994 Jan; 71(1):35-7. PubMed ID: 8120843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of dental arch reproduction using three-dimensional optical digitization.
Brosky ME; Major RJ; DeLong R; Hodges JS
J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Nov; 90(5):434-40. PubMed ID: 14586306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Making a custom tray for elastomeric impression materials without a primary cast.
Ansari IH
J Prosthet Dent; 1994 Nov; 72(5):569-71. PubMed ID: 7844762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of relief space and escape holes on pressure characteristics of maxillary edentulous impressions.
Komiyama O; Saeki H; Kawara M; Kobayashi K; Otake S
J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Jun; 91(6):570-6. PubMed ID: 15211300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The influence of tray type and other variables on the palatal depth of casts made from irreversible hydrocolloid impressions.
Frank RP; Thielke SM; Johnson GH
J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Jan; 87(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 11807479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
