These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
23. Women's perceptions and practices regarding their rights to reproductive health. Abou Shabana K; el-Shiek M; el-Nazer M; Samir N East Mediterr Health J; 2003 May; 9(3):296-308. PubMed ID: 15751922 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Constitutionalizing Roe, Casey and Carhart: a legislative due-process anti-discrimination principle that gives constitutional content to the "undue burden" standard of review applied to abortion control legislation. Van Detta JA South Calif Rev Law Womens Stud; 2001; 10(2):211-92. PubMed ID: 16485363 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Abortion in the United States: barriers to access. Fried MG Health Hum Rights; 2000; 4(2):174-94. PubMed ID: 10796974 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The partial death of abortion rights. Charo RA N Engl J Med; 2007 May; 356(21):2125-8. PubMed ID: 17452437 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Under the radar. Tumulty K; Novak V Time; 2003 Jan; 161(4):38-41. PubMed ID: 12577595 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Webster and women's equality. Johnsen D; Wilder MJ Am J Law Med; 1989; 15(2-3):178-84. PubMed ID: 2603859 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. NOW v. Scheidler: protecting women's access to reproductive health services. Clayton F; Love SN Albany Law Rev; 1999; 62(3):967-97. PubMed ID: 10558500 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Rights to sexual and reproductive health: the ICPD and the convention on the elimination of all forms of discrimination against women. Shalev C Health Hum Rights; 2000; 4(2):38-66. PubMed ID: 10796970 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Primary health care. Abortion: the right choice. Dingwall R Nurs Stand; 1990 Apr 4-10; 4(28):47. PubMed ID: 2111519 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Taking the sting out of reporting requirements: reproductive health clinics and the constitutional right to informational privacy. Bodger JA Duke Law J; 2006 Nov; 56(2):583-609. PubMed ID: 17302004 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. The argument that never ends. Simon R US News World Rep; 2003 Jan; 134(2):24. PubMed ID: 12561696 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Abortion counselling and the 1995 German abortion law. Funk N Conn J Int Law; 1996; 12(1):33-65. PubMed ID: 16506337 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Brazilians have different views on when abortion should be legal, but most do not agree with imprisoning women for abortion. Faúndes A; Duarte GA; de Sousa MH; Soares Camargo RP; Pacagnella RC Reprod Health Matters; 2013 Nov; 21(42):165-73. PubMed ID: 24315072 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A national voice for women's health concerns. Norinsky M Health PAC Bull; 1979; 11(2):21-2. PubMed ID: 10247064 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Making Abortion Safer in Rwanda: Operationalization of the Penal Code of 2012 to Expand Legal Exemptions and Challenges. Sahin Hodoglugil NN; Ngabo F; Ortega J; Nyirazinyoye L; Ngoga E; Dushimeyezu E; Kanyamanza E; Prata N Afr J Reprod Health; 2017 Mar; 21(1):82-92. PubMed ID: 29595028 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The intimidation of American physicians--banning partial-birth abortion. Greene MF N Engl J Med; 2007 May; 356(21):2128-9. PubMed ID: 17452436 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. The power dynamics perpetuating unsafe abortion in Africa: a feminist perspective. Braam T; Hessini L Afr J Reprod Health; 2004 Apr; 8(1):43-51. PubMed ID: 15487612 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]