BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15487748)

  • 21. Diagnostic abilities of three CAD methods for assessing microcalcifications in mammograms and an aspect of equivocal cases decisions by radiologists.
    Hung WT; Nguyen HT; Lee WB; Rickard MT; Thornton BS; Blinowska A
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2003 Sep; 26(3):104-9. PubMed ID: 14626848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A support vector machine approach for detection of microcalcifications.
    El-Naqa I; Yang Y; Wernick MN; Galatsanos NP; Nishikawa RM
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2002 Dec; 21(12):1552-63. PubMed ID: 12588039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Computerized analysis of mammographic microcalcifications in morphological and texture feature spaces.
    Chan HP; Sahiner B; Lam KL; Petrick N; Helvie MA; Goodsitt MM; Adler DD
    Med Phys; 1998 Oct; 25(10):2007-19. PubMed ID: 9800710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A CADx scheme for mammography empowered with topological information from clustered microcalcifications' atlases.
    Andreadis II; Spyrou GM; Nikita KS
    IEEE J Biomed Health Inform; 2015 Jan; 19(1):166-73. PubMed ID: 25073178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Accurate segmentation and contrast measurement of microcalcifications in mammograms: a phantom study.
    Veldkamp WJ; Karssemeijer N
    Med Phys; 1998 Jul; 25(7 Pt 1):1102-10. PubMed ID: 9682195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Computer-aided detection of mammographic microcalcifications: pattern recognition with an artificial neural network.
    Chan HP; Lo SC; Sahiner B; Lam KL; Helvie MA
    Med Phys; 1995 Oct; 22(10):1555-67. PubMed ID: 8551980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Breast mass segmentation in mammography using plane fitting and dynamic programming.
    Song E; Jiang L; Jin R; Zhang L; Yuan Y; Li Q
    Acad Radiol; 2009 Jul; 16(7):826-35. PubMed ID: 19362024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Optimizing parameters for computer-aided diagnosis of microcalcifications at mammography.
    Leichter I; Lederman R; Buchbinder S; Bamberger P; Novak B; Fields S
    Acad Radiol; 2000 Jun; 7(6):406-12. PubMed ID: 10845399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Classification of clusters of microcalcifications in digital breast tomosynthesis.
    Ho CP; Tromans C; Schnabel JA; Brady M
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2010; 2010():3166-9. PubMed ID: 21096808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Computer aided detection system for micro calcifications in digital mammograms.
    Mohamed H; Mabrouk MS; Sharawy A
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2014 Oct; 116(3):226-35. PubMed ID: 24909786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Segmentation of suspicious clustered microcalcifications in mammograms.
    Gavrielides MA; Lo JY; Vargas-Voracek R; Floyd CE
    Med Phys; 2000 Jan; 27(1):13-22. PubMed ID: 10659733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A method to test the reproducibility and to improve performance of computer-aided detection schemes for digitized mammograms.
    Zheng B; Gur D; Good WF; Hardesty LA
    Med Phys; 2004 Nov; 31(11):2964-72. PubMed ID: 15587648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Computer-aided detection of clustered microcalcifications: an improved method for grouping detected signals.
    Nishikawa RM; Giger ML; Doi K; Vyborny CJ; Schmidt RA
    Med Phys; 1993; 20(6):1661-6. PubMed ID: 8309438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Computerized evaluation of mammographic lesions: what diagnostic role does the shape of the individual microcalcifications play compared with the geometry of the cluster?
    Leichter I; Lederman R; Buchbinder SS; Bamberger P; Novak B; Fields S
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2004 Mar; 182(3):705-12. PubMed ID: 14975973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A completely automated CAD system for mass detection in a large mammographic database.
    Bellotti R; De Carlo F; Tangaro S; Gargano G; Maggipinto G; Castellano M; Massafra R; Cascio D; Fauci F; Magro R; Raso G; Lauria A; Forni G; Bagnasco S; Cerello P; Zanon E; Cheran SC; Lopez Torres E; Bottigli U; Masala GL; Oliva P; Retico A; Fantacci ME; Cataldo R; De Mitri I; De Nunzio G
    Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 33(8):3066-75. PubMed ID: 16964885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Computer-aided preoperative diagnosis of microcalcifications on mammograms.
    Kouskos E; Markopoulos C; Revenas K; Koufopoulos K; Kyriakou V; Gogas J
    Acta Radiol; 2003 Jan; 44(1):43-6. PubMed ID: 12630997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Detecting microcalcifications in digital mammograms using wavelet domain hidden Markov tree model.
    Regentova E; Zhang L; Zheng J; Veni G
    Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2006; 2006():1972-5. PubMed ID: 17945686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Computer-aided detection system for clustered microcalcifications: comparison of performance on full-field digital mammograms and digitized screen-film mammograms.
    Ge J; Hadjiiski LM; Sahiner B; Wei J; Helvie MA; Zhou C; Chan HP
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Feb; 52(4):981-1000. PubMed ID: 17264365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Computer-aided segmentation, form analysis and classification of 2975 breast microcalcifications using 7-fold microfocus magnification mammography].
    Grunert JH; Khalifa R; Gmelin E
    Rofo; 2004 Dec; 176(12):1759-65. PubMed ID: 15573286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Investigation of reading mode and relative sensitivity as factors that influence reader performance when using computer-aided detection software.
    Paquerault S; Samuelson FW; Petrick N; Myers KJ; Smith RC
    Acad Radiol; 2009 Sep; 16(9):1095-107. PubMed ID: 19523855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.