These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15487963)

  • 1. Gardner; re BWV: Victorian Supreme Court makes landmark Australian ruling on tube feeding.
    Ashby MA; Mendelson D
    Med J Aust; 2004 Oct; 181(8):442-5. PubMed ID: 15487963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Gardner; Re BWV: resolved and unresolved issues at end of life.
    Rothschild A
    J Law Med; 2004 Feb; 11(3):292-311. PubMed ID: 15018207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The medical provision of hydration and nutrition: two very different outcomes in Victoria and Florida.
    Mendelson D; Ashby M
    J Law Med; 2004 Feb; 11(3):282-91. PubMed ID: 15018206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. In re Guardianship of L.W.
    Wisconsin. Supreme Court
    Wests North West Rep; 1992 Apr; 482():60-79. PubMed ID: 12041147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. In re Edna M.F.
    Wisconsin. Supreme Court
    North West Rep Second Ser; 1997 Jun; 563():485-501. PubMed ID: 12041175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Baby doe redux? The Department of Health and Human Services and the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act of 2002: a cautionary note on normative neonatal practice.
    Sayeed SA
    Pediatrics; 2005 Oct; 116(4):e576-85. PubMed ID: 16199687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Artificial feeding--solid ground, not a slippery slope.
    Steinbrook R; Lo B
    N Engl J Med; 1988 Feb; 318(5):286-90. PubMed ID: 3122046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. In re Estate of Longeway.
    Illinois. Supreme Court
    North East Rep Second Ser; 1989 Nov; 549():292-322. PubMed ID: 12041217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The case of Claire Conroy: will administrative review safeguard incompetent patients?
    Lo B; Dornbrand L
    Ann Intern Med; 1986 Jun; 104(6):869-73. PubMed ID: 3085567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The case of Ms. Nancy Cruzan and the care of the elderly.
    Glover JJ
    J Am Geriatr Soc; 1990 May; 38(5):588-93. PubMed ID: 2110203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Seven legal barriers to end-of-life care: myths, realities, and grains of truth.
    Meisel A; Snyder L; Quill T;
    JAMA; 2000 Nov; 284(19):2495-501. PubMed ID: 11074780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Re Herrington: aboriginality and the quality of human rights jurisprudence in end-of-life decisions by the Australian judiciary.
    Faunce T
    J Law Med; 2007 Oct; 15(2):201-9. PubMed ID: 18035839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. In re Estate of Greenspan.
    Illinois. Supreme Court
    North East Rep Second Ser; 1990 Jul; 558():1194-208. PubMed ID: 12041218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Beyond the Cruzan case: the U.S. Supreme Court and medical practice.
    Lo B; Steinbrook R
    Ann Intern Med; 1991 May; 114(10):895-901. PubMed ID: 2014952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ragona v. Preate.
    Pennsylvania. Court of Common Pleas, Lackawanna County
    Pa Dist Cty Rep; 1990 Nov; 6(1991):202-19. PubMed ID: 12041327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Court responses to withholding or withdrawing artificial nutrition and fluids.
    Paris JJ; Reardon FE
    JAMA; 1985 Apr; 253(15):2243-5. PubMed ID: 3919194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Withdrawal of artificial nutrition in the persistent vegetative state: a continuous controversy.
    Schmidt P; Dettmeyer R; Madea B
    Forensic Sci Int; 2000 Sep; 113(1-3):505-9. PubMed ID: 10978671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Tube feeding patients with dementia.
    Chernoff R
    Nutr Clin Pract; 2006 Apr; 21(2):142-6. PubMed ID: 16556924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. In re Guardianship of Myers.
    Ohio. Court of Common Pleas, Summit County, Probate Division
    North East Rep Second Ser; 1993 Feb; 610():663-71. PubMed ID: 12041223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. In re Lawrance.
    Indiana. Supreme Court
    North East Rep Second Ser; 1991 Sep; 579():32-48. PubMed ID: 12041219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.