375 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15487987)
1. How to track and assess genotyping errors in population genetics studies.
Bonin A; Bellemain E; Bronken Eidesen P; Pompanon F; Brochmann C; Taberlet P
Mol Ecol; 2004 Nov; 13(11):3261-73. PubMed ID: 15487987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quantifying genotyping errors in noninvasive population genetics.
Broquet T; Petit E
Mol Ecol; 2004 Nov; 13(11):3601-8. PubMed ID: 15488016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluating mixed samples as a source of error in non-invasive genetic studies using microsatellites.
Roon DA; Thomas ME; Kendall KC; Waits LP
Mol Ecol; 2005 Jan; 14(1):195-201. PubMed ID: 15643963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. First core microsatellite panel identification in Apennine brown bears (Ursus arctos marsicanus): a collaborative approach.
Scarpulla E; Boattini A; Cozzo M; Giangregorio P; Ciucci P; Mucci N; Randi E; Davoli F
BMC Genomics; 2021 Aug; 22(1):623. PubMed ID: 34407764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Microsatellites behaving badly: empirical evaluation of genotyping errors and subsequent impacts on population studies.
Kelly AC; Mateus-Pinilla NE; Douglas M; Douglas M; Shelton P; Novakofski J
Genet Mol Res; 2011 Oct; 10(4):2534-53. PubMed ID: 22033936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. High-throughput microsatellite genotyping in ecology: improved accuracy, efficiency, standardization and success with low-quantity and degraded DNA.
De Barba M; Miquel C; Lobréaux S; Quenette PY; Swenson JE; Taberlet P
Mol Ecol Resour; 2017 May; 17(3):492-507. PubMed ID: 27505280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. megasat: automated inference of microsatellite genotypes from sequence data.
Zhan L; Paterson IG; Fraser BA; Watson B; Bradbury IR; Nadukkalam Ravindran P; Reznick D; Beiko RG; Bentzen P
Mol Ecol Resour; 2017 Mar; 17(2):247-256. PubMed ID: 27333119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. More affordable and effective noninvasive single nucleotide polymorphism genotyping using high-throughput amplicon sequencing.
Eriksson CE; Ruprecht J; Levi T
Mol Ecol Resour; 2020 Nov; 20(6):1505-1516. PubMed ID: 32521101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Identifying and reducing AFLP genotyping error: an example of tradeoffs when comparing population structure in broadcast spawning versus brooding oysters.
Zhang H; Hare MP
Heredity (Edinb); 2012 Jun; 108(6):616-25. PubMed ID: 22274647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Noninvasive genetic tracking of the endangered Pyrenean brown bear population.
Taberlet P; Camarra JJ; Griffin S; Uhrès E; Hanotte O; Waits LP; Dubois-Paganon C; Burke T; Bouvet J
Mol Ecol; 1997 Sep; 6(9):869-76. PubMed ID: 9301075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Estimation of genotyping error rate from repeat genotyping, unintentional recaptures and known parent-offspring comparisons in 16 microsatellite loci for brown rockfish (Sebastes auriculatus).
Hess MA; Rhydderch JG; LeClair LL; Buckley RM; Kawase M; Hauser L
Mol Ecol Resour; 2012 Nov; 12(6):1114-23. PubMed ID: 22958648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Microsatellite genotyping errors: detection approaches, common sources and consequences for paternal exclusion.
Hoffman JI; Amos W
Mol Ecol; 2005 Feb; 14(2):599-612. PubMed ID: 15660949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Genetic diversity and differentiation in Eryngium alpinum L. (Apiaceae): comparison of AFLP and microsatellite markers.
Gaudeul M; Till-Bottraud I; Barjon F; Manel S
Heredity (Edinb); 2004 Jun; 92(6):508-18. PubMed ID: 15014426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. AFLP utility for population assignment studies: analytical investigation and empirical comparison with microsatellites.
Campbell D; Duchesne P; Bernatchez L
Mol Ecol; 2003 Jul; 12(7):1979-91. PubMed ID: 12803646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An objective, rapid and reproducible method for scoring AFLP peak-height data that minimizes genotyping error.
Whitlock R; Hipperson H; Mannarelli M; Butlin RK; Burke T
Mol Ecol Resour; 2008 Jul; 8(4):725-35. PubMed ID: 21585880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Identification and analysis of error types in high-throughput genotyping.
Ewen KR; Bahlo M; Treloar SA; Levinson DF; Mowry B; Barlow JW; Foote SJ
Am J Hum Genet; 2000 Sep; 67(3):727-36. PubMed ID: 10924406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of genotyping errors on parentage exclusion analysis.
Wang J
Mol Ecol; 2010 Nov; 19(22):5061-78. PubMed ID: 20964757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Characterization of microsatellite loci and reliable genotyping in a polyploid plant, Mercurialis perennis (Euphorbiaceae).
Pfeiffer T; Roschanski AM; Pannell JR; Korbecka G; Schnittler M
J Hered; 2011; 102(4):479-88. PubMed ID: 21576288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Development of SSR Markers and Genetic Diversity in White Birch (Betula platyphylla).
Hao W; Wang S; Liu H; Zhou B; Wang X; Jiang T
PLoS One; 2015; 10(4):e0125235. PubMed ID: 25923698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Isolation and characterization of polymorphic microsatellite loci in the common frog, Rana temporaria.
Berlin S; Merilä J; Ellegren H
Mol Ecol; 2000 Nov; 9(11):1938-9. PubMed ID: 11091340
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
