These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

234 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15488525)

  • 1. The logic of reprobation: assessment and action rules for indirect reciprocation.
    Brandt H; Sigmund K
    J Theor Biol; 2004 Dec; 231(4):475-86. PubMed ID: 15488525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Hidden patterns of reciprocity.
    Syi
    J Theor Biol; 2014 Mar; 345():92-8. PubMed ID: 24368125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evolution of indirect reciprocity in groups of various sizes and comparison with direct reciprocity.
    Suzuki S; Akiyama E
    J Theor Biol; 2007 Apr; 245(3):539-52. PubMed ID: 17182063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of the presence of empty sites on the evolution of cooperation by costly punishment in spatial games.
    Sekiguchi T; Nakamaru M
    J Theor Biol; 2009 Jan; 256(2):297-304. PubMed ID: 18952110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The leading eight: social norms that can maintain cooperation by indirect reciprocity.
    Ohtsuki H; Iwasa Y
    J Theor Biol; 2006 Apr; 239(4):435-44. PubMed ID: 16174521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The competition of assessment rules for indirect reciprocity.
    Uchida S; Sigmund K
    J Theor Biol; 2010 Mar; 263(1):13-9. PubMed ID: 19962390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Indirect reciprocity can stabilize cooperation without the second-order free rider problem.
    Panchanathan K; Boyd R
    Nature; 2004 Nov; 432(7016):499-502. PubMed ID: 15565153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Three-person game facilitates indirect reciprocity under image scoring.
    Suzuki S; Akiyama E
    J Theor Biol; 2007 Nov; 249(1):93-100. PubMed ID: 17714735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The good, the bad and the discriminator--errors in direct and indirect reciprocity.
    Brandt H; Sigmund K
    J Theor Biol; 2006 Mar; 239(2):183-94. PubMed ID: 16257417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evolutionary game theory meets social science: is there a unifying rule for human cooperation?
    Rosas A
    J Theor Biol; 2010 May; 264(2):450-6. PubMed ID: 20167223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evolution of indirect reciprocity by image scoring.
    Nowak MA; Sigmund K
    Nature; 1998 Jun; 393(6685):573-7. PubMed ID: 9634232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Global analyses of evolutionary dynamics and exhaustive search for social norms that maintain cooperation by reputation.
    Ohtsuki H; Iwasa Y
    J Theor Biol; 2007 Feb; 244(3):518-31. PubMed ID: 17030041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Direct reciprocity with costly punishment: generous tit-for-tat prevails.
    Rand DG; Ohtsuki H; Nowak MA
    J Theor Biol; 2009 Jan; 256(1):45-57. PubMed ID: 18938180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Punishment leads to cooperative behavior in structured societies.
    Shutters ST
    Evol Comput; 2012; 20(2):301-19. PubMed ID: 22171813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reciprocity: weak or strong? What punishment experiments do (and do not) demonstrate.
    Guala F
    Behav Brain Sci; 2012 Feb; 35(1):1-15. PubMed ID: 22289303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A study of indirect reciprocity involving a reputation system or a simple tag system in a one-shot, multi-player game.
    Tanimoto J
    Biosystems; 2007; 90(3):856-69. PubMed ID: 17583420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The efficient interaction of indirect reciprocity and costly punishment.
    Rockenbach B; Milinski M
    Nature; 2006 Dec; 444(7120):718-23. PubMed ID: 17151660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Rules of social exchange: game theory, individual differences and psychopathology.
    Wischniewski J; Windmann S; Juckel G; Brüne M
    Neurosci Biobehav Rev; 2009 Mar; 33(3):305-13. PubMed ID: 18930761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The importance of subjectivity in perceptual errors on the emergence of indirect reciprocity.
    Takahashi N; Mashima R
    J Theor Biol; 2006 Dec; 243(3):418-36. PubMed ID: 16904697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. How should we define goodness?--reputation dynamics in indirect reciprocity.
    Ohtsuki H; Iwasa Y
    J Theor Biol; 2004 Nov; 231(1):107-20. PubMed ID: 15363933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.