760 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15489176)
1. Obstetric and gynecologic malpractice in Turkey: incidence, impact, causes and prevention.
Büken E; Ornek Büken N; Büken B
J Clin Forensic Med; 2004 Oct; 11(5):233-47. PubMed ID: 15489176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Analysis of 82 forensic expertise cases on medical disputes in obstetrics and gynecology].
Zhou M; Huang Y; Deng ZH
Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2009 Jun; 25(3):192-4. PubMed ID: 19697777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [The risk of medical error occurrence on holidays in the material of the Forensic Medicine Department, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, in the years 2000-2005].
Chowaniec C; Chowaniec M; Nowak A; Jabłoński C
Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol; 2007; 57(1):95-100. PubMed ID: 17571510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Malpractice in internal medicine in the case material of the Forensic Medicine Department, Medical University of Lódź, Poland].
Mizerska M; Berent J; Barzdo M; Markuszewski L; Szram S
Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol; 2004; 54(4):252-8. PubMed ID: 15782783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Trends in malpractice claims for obstetric and gynecologic procedures, 2005 through 2014.
Glaser LM; Alvi FA; Milad MP
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Sep; 217(3):340.e1-340.e6. PubMed ID: 28549980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cause and effect analysis of closed claims in obstetrics and gynecology.
White AA; Pichert JW; Bledsoe SH; Irwin C; Entman SS
Obstet Gynecol; 2005 May; 105(5 Pt 1):1031-8. PubMed ID: 15863541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Medical malpractice as reflected by the forensic evaluation of 4450 autopsies.
Madea B; Preuss J
Forensic Sci Int; 2009 Sep; 190(1-3):58-66. PubMed ID: 19524380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Most of the complaints in gynecology and obstetrics care are generated by perceptions stemming from unavoidable results].
Morales Ramírez JJ; Sauceda González LF
Ginecol Obstet Mex; 2001 Mar; 69():108-17. PubMed ID: 11387879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Surgical errors in archives of the forensic medicine department, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, and in Archives of the District Chamber of Physicians in Szczecin].
Deboa D
Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol; 2007; 57(2):205-9. PubMed ID: 17691177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Obstetric and gynecologic malpractice claims in Saudi Arabia: Incidence and cause.
AlDakhil LO
J Forensic Leg Med; 2016 May; 40():8-11. PubMed ID: 26947435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Retrospective study on forty cases of medical legal dispute].
Xu DH; Hu L; Xiong XW
Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2009 Aug; 25(4):279-81. PubMed ID: 19788079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Practice patterns to decrease the risk of a malpractice suit.
Williams DG
Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Dec; 51(4):680-7. PubMed ID: 18981792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Medico-legal autopsies as a source of information to improve patient safety.
Madea B
Leg Med (Tokyo); 2009 Apr; 11 Suppl 1():S76-9. PubMed ID: 19289305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [The problems in organizing forensic medical expertise in cases of professional law infringements by medical workers (exemplified by obstetrical-gynecological service)].
Plaksin VO; Gurtovoĭ BL; Oboĭmakov VB
Sud Med Ekspert; 1994; 37(1):3-6. PubMed ID: 8184455
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [An analysis of forensic medical expertise on matters of the professional law infringements of medical workers].
Zykova NA; Ribenson MS
Sud Med Ekspert; 1998; 41(3):3-6. PubMed ID: 9703733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Malpractice and system of expertise in anaesthetic procedures in Turkey.
Ozdemir MH; Cekin N; Can IO; Hilal A
Forensic Sci Int; 2005 Oct; 153(2-3):161-7. PubMed ID: 16139105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [On the causes of medical errors in life-threatening conditions--a medico-legal assessment based on the material of the chair and Department of Forensic Medicine, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, collected between 2000 and the end of June, 2006].
Chowaniec C; Chowaniec M; Kobek M; Nowak A
Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol; 2007; 57(2):200-4. PubMed ID: 17691176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Medical legal dispute in hospitals of different grades: a retrospective study on 206 cases.
Li K; Muhetebaier M; Wang JW; Xie SM; Zhang K; Tang W; Chen F
Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2014 Oct; 30(5):355-6. PubMed ID: 25735073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Analysis of surgical errors in closed malpractice claims at 4 liability insurers.
Rogers SO; Gawande AA; Kwaan M; Puopolo AL; Yoon C; Brennan TA; Studdert DM
Surgery; 2006 Jul; 140(1):25-33. PubMed ID: 16857439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Risk management in gynecology and obstetrics. Forensic questions in connection with operative gynecology and obstetrics].
Scharf A; Steinborn A; Geka F; Sohn C
Bull Soc Sci Med Grand Duche Luxemb; 1999; (3):41-51. PubMed ID: 11100183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]