BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

761 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15489176)

  • 21. [Analysis and consider of technical identification for 32 cases medical tangle in medical association].
    Zhang LL; Huang GZ; Chen XR; Zhou YW; Liu L
    Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2006 Feb; 22(1):78-80. PubMed ID: 16524196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Medical malpractice charges in Germany--role of the forensic pathologist in the preliminary criminal proceeding.
    Dettmeyer R; Egl M; Madea B
    J Forensic Sci; 2005 Mar; 50(2):423-7. PubMed ID: 15813555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Epidemiology of medico-legal litigations and related medical errors in Central and Northern Saudi Arabia. A retrospective prevalence study.
    Henary BY; Al-Yahia OA; Al-Gabbany SA; Al-Kharaz SM
    Saudi Med J; 2012 Jul; 33(7):768-75. PubMed ID: 22821312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Algorhythm of making forensic medical expert examinations by medical documents in obstetric-gynecological practice].
    Beliaev LV; Nozdriakov KV
    Sud Med Ekspert; 2007; 50(1):18-21. PubMed ID: 17338336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [The incidence of medical tangles related to death--the first report of a retrospective study on 27 years forensic autopsy work of medical tangles].
    Zhang YG
    Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2000 May; 16(2):72-4, 127. PubMed ID: 12536452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Forensic analysis of 74 tumor related medical malpractice cases].
    Guo YD; Cai JF; Chang YF; Guan P; Wen JF
    Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2010 Jun; 26(3):192-5. PubMed ID: 20707278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Forensic expertise in obstetrics and gynecology - Forensic expert experience.
    Habek D
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2021 Jan; 256():1-5. PubMed ID: 33161209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Evaluation of surgical malpractice in Turkey.
    Tümer AR; Dener C
    Leg Med (Tokyo); 2006 Jan; 8(1):11-5. PubMed ID: 16157500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Autopsy profiles of malpractice cases.
    Pakis I; Yayci N; Karapirli M; Gunce E; Polat O
    J Forensic Leg Med; 2009 Jan; 16(1):7-10. PubMed ID: 19061842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Dental malpractice cases in Turkey during 1991-2000.
    Ozdemir MH; Saracoglu A; Ozdemir AU; Ergonen AT
    J Clin Forensic Med; 2005 Jun; 12(3):137-42. PubMed ID: 15914308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Medical liability in gynecology and obstetrics. Analysis of 25 cases].
    Campos-Castolo M; Valle-González A
    Ginecol Obstet Mex; 2001 Feb; 69():57-64. PubMed ID: 11339175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Ambulatory surgery from the forensic viewpoint].
    Ulsenheimer K
    Gynakologe; 1994 Aug; 27(4):264-70. PubMed ID: 7959314
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Forensic-medical obstetric-gynecological examinations in cases on professional delinquency of medical personnel].
    Dmitrieva OA; Fedchenko TM; Goncharenko DV; Iurtaeva EA; Pichugin AP
    Sud Med Ekspert; 2007; 50(4):24-7. PubMed ID: 17718085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Lawsuits against gynecologists-obstetricians in the National Commission of Medical Arbitration].
    Sauceda González LF; Tinoco Jaramillo G; Morales Ramírez JJ
    Ginecol Obstet Mex; 2001 Dec; 69():487-91. PubMed ID: 11824109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [The advantage of simultaneous operations in obstetrical and gynaecological practice].
    Sulukhiia RV; Sinauridze ZV; Meliia LG
    Georgian Med News; 2006 Sep; (138):98-101. PubMed ID: 17057313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Preventable treatment errors in gynecology and obstetrics. From the practice of an expert commission].
    Cyran W
    Gynakologe; 1994 Aug; 27(4):256-9. PubMed ID: 7959312
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Estimation of medical protocol correctness in the light of opinions issued as ordered by the judiciary or prosecution authorities].
    Pieśniak D; Jankowski Z; Raszeja S
    Pol Merkur Lekarski; 2007 Jul; 23(133):47-51. PubMed ID: 18051829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The malpractice crisis in obstetrics and gynecology: is there a solution?
    Barber HR
    Bull N Y Acad Med; 1991; 67(2):162-72. PubMed ID: 2049569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Perinatal medical negligence closed claims from the St. Paul Company, 1980-1982.
    Ogburn PL; Julian TM; Brooker DC; Joseph MS; Butler JC; Williams PP; Anderson ML; Shepard AC; Ogburn SL; Preisler WC
    J Reprod Med; 1988 Jul; 33(7):608-11. PubMed ID: 3172061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Obstetric and gynecologic malpractice in Louisiana: incidence and impact.
    Begneaud WP
    J La State Med Soc; 1989 Sep; 141(9):27-33. PubMed ID: 2794746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 39.