These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
307 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15490135)
21. Optimal and preferred eye landing positions in objects and scenes. Foulsham T; Kingstone A Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013 Sep; 66(9):1707-28. PubMed ID: 23398283 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Crossmodal enhancement in the LOC for visuohaptic object recognition over development. Jao RJ; James TW; James KH Neuropsychologia; 2015 Oct; 77():76-89. PubMed ID: 26272239 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Characteristics of eye movements in 3-D object learning: comparison between within-modal and cross-modal object recognition. Ueda Y; Saiki J Perception; 2012; 41(11):1289-98. PubMed ID: 23513616 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Spatial scene representations formed by self-organizing learning in a hippocampal extension of the ventral visual system. Rolls ET; Tromans JM; Stringer SM Eur J Neurosci; 2008 Nov; 28(10):2116-27. PubMed ID: 19046392 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Similarity and categorization: from vision to touch. Gaissert N; Bülthoff HH; Wallraven C Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 Sep; 138(1):219-30. PubMed ID: 21752344 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Intrinsic frames of reference and egocentric viewpoints in scene recognition. Mou W; Fan Y; McNamara TP; Owen CB Cognition; 2008 Feb; 106(2):750-69. PubMed ID: 17540353 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Size-sensitive perceptual representations underlie visual and haptic object recognition. Craddock M; Lawson R PLoS One; 2009 Nov; 4(11):e8009. PubMed ID: 19956685 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The role of the anterior intraparietal sulcus in crossmodal processing of object features in humans: an rTMS study. Buelte D; Meister IG; Staedtgen M; Dambeck N; Sparing R; Grefkes C; Boroojerdi B Brain Res; 2008 Jun; 1217():110-8. PubMed ID: 18501339 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Differential effects of non-informative vision and visual interference on haptic spatial processing. Volcic R; van Rheede JJ; Postma A; Kappers AM Exp Brain Res; 2008 Sep; 190(1):31-41. PubMed ID: 18553074 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Visuo-haptic integration in object identification using novel objects. Desmarais G; Meade M; Wells T; Nadeau M Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Nov; 79(8):2478-2498. PubMed ID: 28744702 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Congruency effect of presentation modality on false recognition of haptic and visual objects. Nabeta T; Kawahara J Memory; 2006 Apr; 14(3):307-15. PubMed ID: 16574587 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The effect of visuo-haptic congruency on haptic spatial matching. Kaas AL; van Mier HI; Lataster J; Fingal M; Sack AT Exp Brain Res; 2007 Oct; 183(1):75-85. PubMed ID: 17624519 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. View combination: a generalization mechanism for visual recognition. Friedman A; Waller D; Thrash T; Greenauer N; Hodgson E Cognition; 2011 May; 119(2):229-41. PubMed ID: 21334606 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The effects of interference on recognition of haptic pictures in blindfolded sighted participants: the modality of representation of haptic information. Holtby RC; D'Angiulli A Scand J Psychol; 2012 Apr; 53(2):112-8. PubMed ID: 22251003 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]