These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
23. Straight shooting. Texas consumers at last get look at hospital report card. Taylor M Mod Healthc; 2002 Oct; 32(41):18. PubMed ID: 12415993 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Special report: state report cards put hospitals in the spotlight. Russ Coiles Health Trends; 2002 Oct; 14(12):10-2. PubMed ID: 12387205 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Hospital performance reports: impact on quality, market share, and reputation. Hibbard JH; Stockard J; Tusler M Health Aff (Millwood); 2005; 24(4):1150-60. PubMed ID: 16012155 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. When consumers have a choice of hospital, quality record counts, according to survey. Health Care Strateg Manage; 2004 Feb; 22(2):6-7. PubMed ID: 15005075 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Patients' views about cardiac report cards: a qualitative study. Richard SA; Rawal S; Martin DK Can J Cardiol; 2005 Sep; 21(11):943-7. PubMed ID: 16239978 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Gauging satisfaction. S. Calif. docs beaten by N. Californians in new survey. Jaklevic MC Mod Healthc; 1997 Sep; 27(37):62. PubMed ID: 10173606 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Getting satisfaction. The CMS survey publicly revealing patient satisfaction with hospitals is one step closer to becoming a reality. Conn J Mod Healthc; 2005 Dec; 35(50):6-7, 13, 1. PubMed ID: 17899645 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. What patients want: A content analysis of key qualities that influence patient satisfaction. Anderson R; Barbara A; Feldman S J Med Pract Manage; 2007; 22(5):255-61. PubMed ID: 17494478 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Measures of surgical quality: what will patients know by 2005? Broder MS; Payne-Simon L; Brook RH J Eval Clin Pract; 2005 Jun; 11(3):209-17. PubMed ID: 15869551 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Consumer attitudes about health care acquired infections: a German survey on factors considered important in the choice of a hospital. Vonberg RP; Sander C; Gastmeier P Am J Med Qual; 2008; 23(1):56-9. PubMed ID: 18187591 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Revision: Accreditation Participation Requirements regarding receipt of anonymous patient-level data for hospitals. Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations Jt Comm Perspect; 2007 Jan; 27(1):3-4. PubMed ID: 17323795 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. From interview to instrument: how to develop a PS (patient satisfaction) survey. Pyzdek T Hosp Peer Rev; 1999 Mar; 24(3):43-5. PubMed ID: 10346272 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Hospitals compare quality. CMS' release of quality data may change behavior. Taylor M Mod Healthc; 2005 Apr; 35(14):4. PubMed ID: 15825944 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Flunking asthma? When HEDIS takes the ACT. Lim KG; Patel AM; Naessens JM; Li JT; Volcheck GW; Wagie AE; Enders FB; Beebe TJ Am J Manag Care; 2008 Aug; 14(8):487-94. PubMed ID: 18690764 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Matching patients and practitioners based on beliefs about care: results of a randomized controlled trial. Krupat E; Hsu J; Irish J; Schmittdiel JA; Selby J Am J Manag Care; 2004 Nov; 10(11 Pt 1):814-22. PubMed ID: 15623271 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Modified importance-performance analysis: an application to hospitals. Yavas U; Shemwell DJ Int J Health Care Qual Assur Inc Leadersh Health Serv; 2001; 14(2-3):104-10. PubMed ID: 11436745 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]