BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15490921)

  • 1. Declining use of mastectomy for invasive breast cancer in Canada, 1981-2000.
    Gaudette LA; Gao RN; Spence A; Shi F; Johansen H; Olivotto IA
    Can J Public Health; 2004; 95(5):336-40. PubMed ID: 15490921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of Nancy Reagan's mastectomy on choice of surgery for breast cancer by US women.
    Nattinger AB; Hoffmann RG; Howell-Pelz A; Goodwin JS
    JAMA; 1998 Mar; 279(10):762-6. PubMed ID: 9508152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Factors predictive of treatment by Australian breast surgeons of invasive female breast cancer by mastectomy rather than breast conserving surgery.
    Roder D; Zorbas H; Kollias J; Pyke C; Walters D; Campbell I; Taylor C; Webster F
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2013; 14(1):539-45. PubMed ID: 23534791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Trends in Reoperation After Initial Lumpectomy for Breast Cancer: Addressing Overtreatment in Surgical Management.
    Morrow M; Abrahamse P; Hofer TP; Ward KC; Hamilton AS; Kurian AW; Katz SJ; Jagsi R
    JAMA Oncol; 2017 Oct; 3(10):1352-1357. PubMed ID: 28586788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Patterns and correlates of adjuvant radiotherapy receipt after lumpectomy and after mastectomy for breast cancer.
    Jagsi R; Abrahamse P; Morrow M; Hawley ST; Griggs JJ; Graff JJ; Hamilton AS; Katz SJ
    J Clin Oncol; 2010 May; 28(14):2396-403. PubMed ID: 20351324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Temporal trends in breast cancer surgery in Ontario: can one randomized trial make a difference?
    Iscoe NA; Naylor CD; Williams JI; DeBoer G; Morgan MW; Fehringer G; Holowaty E
    CMAJ; 1994 Apr; 150(7):1109-15. PubMed ID: 8137191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. What drove changes in the use of breast conserving surgery since the early 1980s? The role of the clinical trial, celebrity action and an NIH consensus statement.
    Du X; Freeman DH; Syblik DA
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2000 Jul; 62(1):71-9. PubMed ID: 10989987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Breast conserving surgery versus mastectomy: the influence of comorbidities on choice of surgical operation in the Department of Defense health care system.
    Zhou J; Enewold L; Zahm SH; Jatoi I; Shriver C; Anderson WF; Jeffery DD; Andaya A; Potter JF; McGlynn KA; Zhu K
    Am J Surg; 2013 Sep; 206(3):393-9. PubMed ID: 23866763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of breast-conserving therapy vs mastectomy in women under age 40: National trends and potential survival implications.
    Lazow SP; Riba L; Alapati A; James TA
    Breast J; 2019 Jul; 25(4):578-584. PubMed ID: 31090168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluating the Effect of Margin Consensus Guideline Publication on Operative Patterns and Financial Impact of Breast Cancer Operation.
    Bhutiani N; Mercer MK; Bachman KC; Heidrich SR; Martin RCG; Scoggins CR; McMasters KM; Ajkay N
    J Am Coll Surg; 2018 Jul; 227(1):6-11. PubMed ID: 29428232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Change in the use of breast-conserving surgery in western Washington after the 1990 NIH Consensus Development Conference.
    Lazovich D; White E; Thomas DB; Moe RE; Taplin S
    Arch Surg; 1997 Apr; 132(4):418-23. PubMed ID: 9108764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Changes in mastectomy rates at a Brazilian public hospital over 20 years (1989 to 2008).
    Balabram D; Araújo FB; Porto SS; Rodrigues JS; Sousa AS; Siqueira AL; Gobbi H
    Sao Paulo Med J; 2012; 130(6):360-6. PubMed ID: 23338732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Factors predicting the use of breast-conserving therapy in stage I and II breast carcinoma.
    Morrow M; White J; Moughan J; Owen J; Pajack T; Sylvester J; Wilson JF; Winchester D
    J Clin Oncol; 2001 Apr; 19(8):2254-62. PubMed ID: 11304779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Case-mix fails to explain variation in mastectomy rates: management of screen-detected breast cancer in a UK region 1997-2003.
    Caldon LJ; Walters SJ; Reed JA; Murphy A; Worley A; Reed MW
    Br J Cancer; 2005 Jan; 92(1):55-9. PubMed ID: 15611797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Increasing mastectomy rates among all age groups for early stage breast cancer: a 10-year study of surgical choice.
    Dragun AE; Huang B; Tucker TC; Spanos WJ
    Breast J; 2012; 18(4):318-25. PubMed ID: 22607016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Breast-conserving surgery
    Sinnadurai S; Kwong A; Hartman M; Tan EY; Bhoo-Pathy NT; Dahlui M; See MH; Yip CH; Taib NA; Bhoo-Pathy N
    BJS Open; 2019 Feb; 3(1):48-55. PubMed ID: 30734015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Changing surgical trends in young patients with early stage breast cancer, 2003 to 2010: a report from the National Cancer Data Base.
    Pesce CE; Liederbach E; Czechura T; Winchester DJ; Yao K
    J Am Coll Surg; 2014 Jul; 219(1):19-28. PubMed ID: 24862886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Breast cancer surgery in Norway 1986-2009].
    Hofvind S; Schlichting E; Ursin G; Sebuødegård S; Kåresen R
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2013 Aug; 133(15):1582-6. PubMed ID: 23970271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Variability in reexcision following breast conservation surgery.
    McCahill LE; Single RM; Aiello Bowles EJ; Feigelson HS; James TA; Barney T; Engel JM; Onitilo AA
    JAMA; 2012 Feb; 307(5):467-75. PubMed ID: 22298678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Increasing mastectomy rates-the effect of environmental factors on the choice for mastectomy: a comparative analysis between Canada and the United States.
    Covelli AM; Baxter NN; Fitch MI; Wright FC
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2014 Oct; 21(10):3173-84. PubMed ID: 25081340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.