These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

275 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15491275)

  • 1. The interpersonal effects of emotions in negotiations: a motivated information processing approach.
    Van Kleef GA; De Dreu CK; Manstead AS
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2004 Oct; 87(4):510-28. PubMed ID: 15491275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The interpersonal effects of anger and happiness in negotiations.
    van Kleef GA; De Dreu CK; Manstead AS
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2004 Jan; 86(1):57-76. PubMed ID: 14717628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Supplication and appeasement in conflict and negotiation: The interpersonal effects of disappointment, worry, guilt, and regret.
    Van Kleef GA; De Dreu CK; Manstead AS
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2006 Jul; 91(1):124-42. PubMed ID: 16834484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. What other's disappointment may do to selfish people: emotion and social value orientation in a negotiation context.
    Van Kleef GA; Van Lange PA
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2008 Aug; 34(8):1084-95. PubMed ID: 18524971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A social functional approach to emotions in bargaining: when communicating anger pays and when it backfires.
    van Dijk E; van Kleef GA; Steinel W; van Beest I
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2008 Apr; 94(4):600-14. PubMed ID: 18361674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Understanding emotional transitions: the interpersonal consequences of changing emotions in negotiations.
    Filipowicz A; Barsade S; Melwani S
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2011 Sep; 101(3):541-56. PubMed ID: 21639649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Motivated information processing, strategic choice, and the quality of negotiated agreement.
    De Dreu CK; Beersma B; Stroebe K; Euwema MC
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2006 Jun; 90(6):927-43. PubMed ID: 16784343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Why anger and disappointment affect other's bargaining behavior differently: the moderating role of power and the mediating role of reciprocal and complementary emotions.
    Lelieveld GJ; Van Dijk E; Van Beest I; Van Kleef GA
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2012 Sep; 38(9):1209-21. PubMed ID: 22623429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparing integral and incidental emotions: Testing insights from emotions as social information theory and attribution theory.
    Hillebrandt A; Barclay LJ
    J Appl Psychol; 2017 May; 102(5):732-752. PubMed ID: 28054819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. On being peripheral and paying attention: prototypicality and information processing in intergroup conflict.
    Van Kleef GA; Steinel W; Homan AC
    J Appl Psychol; 2013 Jan; 98(1):63-79. PubMed ID: 23205495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Does communicating disappointment in negotiations help or hurt? Solving an apparent inconsistency in the social-functional approach to emotions.
    Lelieveld GJ; Van Dijk E; Van Beest I; Van Kleef GA
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2013 Oct; 105(4):605-20. PubMed ID: 23773043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. It takes one to tango: the effects of dyads' epistemic motivation composition in negotiation.
    Ten Velden FS; Beersma B; De Dreu CK
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2010 Nov; 36(11):1454-66. PubMed ID: 20841436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Perspective taking as a means to overcome motivational barriers in negotiations: when putting oneself into the opponent's shoes helps to walk toward agreements.
    Trötschel R; Hüffmeier J; Loschelder DD; Schwartz K; Gollwitzer PM
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2011 Oct; 101(4):771-90. PubMed ID: 21728447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Power, propensity to negotiate, and moving first in competitive interactions.
    Magee JC; Galinsky AD; Gruenfeld DH
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2007 Feb; 33(2):200-12. PubMed ID: 17259581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. No effect of inversion on attentional and affective processing of facial expressions.
    Lipp OV; Price SM; Tellegen CL
    Emotion; 2009 Apr; 9(2):248-59. PubMed ID: 19348536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. First offers as anchors: the role of perspective-taking and negotiator focus.
    Galinsky AD; Mussweiler T
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2001 Oct; 81(4):657-69. PubMed ID: 11642352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Happy but not so approachable: the social judgments of individuals with generalized social phobia.
    Campbell DW; Sareen J; Stein MB; Kravetsky LB; Paulus MP; Hassard ST; Reiss JP
    Depress Anxiety; 2009; 26(5):419-24. PubMed ID: 19242987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cultural variance in the interpersonal effects of anger in negotiations.
    Adam H; Shirako A; Maddux WW
    Psychol Sci; 2010 Jun; 21(6):882-9. PubMed ID: 20483822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. When feeling bad is expected to be good: emotion regulation and outcome expectancies in social conflicts.
    Tamir M; Ford BQ
    Emotion; 2012 Aug; 12(4):807-16. PubMed ID: 21728413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of descriptive anger expression, insult, and no feedback on interpersonal aggression, hostility, and empathy motivation.
    Gaines T; Kirwin PM; Gentry WD
    Genet Psychol Monogr; 1977 May; 95(2):349-67. PubMed ID: 873167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.