These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15491476)

  • 1. Frequency doubling perimetry screening mode compared to the full-threshold mode.
    Stoutenbeek R; Heeg GP; Jansonius NM
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2004 Nov; 24(6):493-7. PubMed ID: 15491476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An evaluation of algorithms designed to classify the results from frequency doubling perimetry.
    Müskens RP; Heeg GP; Jansonius NM
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2004 Nov; 24(6):498-503. PubMed ID: 15491477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Groningen Longitudinal Glaucoma Study. I. Baseline sensitivity and specificity of the frequency doubling perimeter and the GDx nerve fibre analyser.
    Heeg GP; Blanksma LJ; Hardus PL; Jansonius NM
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2005 Feb; 83(1):46-52. PubMed ID: 15715556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Frequency-doubling technology: searching for the optimum diagnostic criteria for glaucoma.
    Ferreras A; Larrosa JM; Polo V; Pajarín AB; Mayoral F; Honrubia FM
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2007 Feb; 85(1):73-9. PubMed ID: 17244214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Screening for glaucomatous visual field loss with frequency-doubling perimetry.
    Johnson CA; Samuels SJ
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1997 Feb; 38(2):413-25. PubMed ID: 9040475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Threshold and variability properties of matrix frequency-doubling technology and standard automated perimetry in glaucoma.
    Artes PH; Hutchison DM; Nicolela MT; LeBlanc RP; Chauhan BC
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Jul; 46(7):2451-7. PubMed ID: 15980235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [The value of frequency doubling perimetry in glaucoma screening of aged 40 or more population].
    Li JJ; Xu L; Zhang RX; Sun XY; Yang H; Zou Y; Zhao JL
    Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2005 Mar; 41(3):221-5. PubMed ID: 15840362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Performance of frequency-doubling technology perimetry in a population-based prevalence survey of glaucoma: the Tajimi study.
    Iwase A; Tomidokoro A; Araie M; Shirato S; Shimizu H; Kitazawa Y;
    Ophthalmology; 2007 Jan; 114(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 17070580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of the high specificity Screening Program (C-20-1) of the Frequency Doubling Technology (FDT) perimeter in clinical practice.
    North RV; Jones AL; Hunter E; Morgan JE; Wild JM
    Eye (Lond); 2006 Jun; 20(6):681-7. PubMed ID: 15999135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Frequency doubling perimetry and short-wavelength automated perimetry to detect early glaucoma.
    Leeprechanon N; Giaconi JA; Manassakorn A; Hoffman D; Caprioli J
    Ophthalmology; 2007 May; 114(5):931-7. PubMed ID: 17397926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Automated flicker perimetry in glaucoma using Octopus 311: a comparative study with the Humphrey Matrix.
    Matsumoto C; Takada S; Okuyama S; Arimura E; Hashimoto S; Shimomura Y
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2006 Apr; 84(2):210-5. PubMed ID: 16637839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Detectability of glaucomatous changes using SAP, FDT, flicker perimetry, and OCT.
    Nomoto H; Matsumoto C; Takada S; Hashimoto S; Arimura E; Okuyama S; Shimomura Y
    J Glaucoma; 2009 Feb; 18(2):165-71. PubMed ID: 19225357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Can frequency-doubling technology and short-wavelength automated perimetries detect visual field defects before standard automated perimetry in patients with preperimetric glaucoma?
    Ferreras A; Polo V; Larrosa JM; Pablo LE; Pajarin AB; Pueyo V; Honrubia FM
    J Glaucoma; 2007; 16(4):372-83. PubMed ID: 17571000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Impact of diabetes on glaucoma screening using frequency-doubling perimetry.
    Realini T; Lai MQ; Barber L
    Ophthalmology; 2004 Nov; 111(11):2133-6. PubMed ID: 15522382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Glaucoma detection with frequency doubling perimetry and short-wavelength perimetry.
    Horn FK; Brenning A; Jünemann AG; Lausen B
    J Glaucoma; 2007; 16(4):363-71. PubMed ID: 17570999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Humphrey matrix frequency doubling perimetry for detection of visual-field defects in open-angle glaucoma.
    Clement CI; Goldberg I; Healey PR; Graham S
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2009 May; 93(5):582-8. PubMed ID: 18669543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Optimizing the use of frequency doubling technology perimetry in community vision screenings.
    Nehmad L; Madonna RJ
    Optom Vis Sci; 2008 Jul; 85(7):559-65. PubMed ID: 18594349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Frequency-doubling perimetry: comparison with standard automated perimetry to detect glaucoma.
    Leeprechanon N; Giangiacomo A; Fontana H; Hoffman D; Caprioli J
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Feb; 143(2):263-271. PubMed ID: 17178091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sensitivity and specificity of frequency-doubling technology, tendency-oriented perimetry, SITA Standard and SITA Fast perimetry in perimetrically inexperienced individuals.
    Pierre-Filho Pde T; Schimiti RB; de Vasconcellos JP; Costa VP
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2006 Jun; 84(3):345-50. PubMed ID: 16704696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The results of screening frequency doubling technology perimetry in different locations of the community.
    Mansberger SL; Johnson CA; Cioffi GA
    J Glaucoma; 2007 Jan; 16(1):73-80. PubMed ID: 17224754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.