These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15491476)

  • 21. The results of screening frequency doubling technology perimetry in different locations of the community.
    Mansberger SL; Johnson CA; Cioffi GA
    J Glaucoma; 2007 Jan; 16(1):73-80. PubMed ID: 17224754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effect of cataract extraction on frequency doubling technology perimetry.
    Kook MS; Yang SJ; Kim S; Chung J; Kim ST; Tchah H
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2004 Jul; 138(1):85-90. PubMed ID: 15234286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Repeatability of frequency doubling technology perimetry (20-1 screening program) and the effect of pupillary dilatation on interpretation.
    Parikh R; Muliyil J; George R; Bhat S; Thomas R
    Ophthalmic Epidemiol; 2008; 15(1):42-6. PubMed ID: 18300088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effects of input data on the performance of a neural network in distinguishing normal and glaucomatous visual fields.
    Bengtsson B; Bizios D; Heijl A
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Oct; 46(10):3730-6. PubMed ID: 16186356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Diagnostic sensitivity of fast blue-yellow and standard automated perimetry in early glaucoma: a comparison between different test programs.
    Bengtsson B; Heijl A
    Ophthalmology; 2006 Jul; 113(7):1092-7. PubMed ID: 16815399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Evaluation of decision rules for frequency-doubling technology screening tests.
    Gardiner SK; Anderson DR; Fingeret M; McSoley JJ; Johnson CA
    Optom Vis Sci; 2006 Jul; 83(7):432-7. PubMed ID: 16840859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Humphrey matrix frequency doubling technology perimetry and optical coherence tomography measurement of the retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in both normal and ocular hypertensive subjects.
    Mastropasqua L; Brusini P; Carpineto P; Ciancaglini M; Di Antonio L; Zeppieri MW; Parisi L
    J Glaucoma; 2006 Aug; 15(4):328-35. PubMed ID: 16865011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Does frequency doubling technology perimetry reliably detect neurological visual field defects?
    Fong KC; Byles DB; Constable PH
    Eye (Lond); 2003 Apr; 17(3):330-3. PubMed ID: 12724694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Eye Movement Perimetry and Frequency Doubling Perimetry: clinical performance and patient preference during glaucoma screening.
    Meethal NSK; Pel JJM; Mazumdar D; Asokan R; Panday M; van der Steen J; George R
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2019 Jun; 257(6):1277-1287. PubMed ID: 30944987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Influence of test reliability on the screening performance of frequency-doubling perimetry.
    Heeg GP; Jansonius NM
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2006 Mar; 141(3):585-7. PubMed ID: 16490521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparison of standard automated perimetry with matrix frequency-doubling technology in patients with resolved optic neuritis.
    Sakai T; Matsushima M; Shikishima K; Kitahara K
    Ophthalmology; 2007 May; 114(5):949-56. PubMed ID: 17382395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Frequency doubling technology perimetry in open-angle glaucoma eyes with hemifield visual field damage: comparison of high-tension and normal-tension groups.
    Murata H; Tomidokoro A; Matsuo H; Tomita G; Araie M
    J Glaucoma; 2007 Jan; 16(1):9-13. PubMed ID: 17224743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Meta-analysis of diagnostic capability of frequency-doubling technology (FDT) for primary glaucoma].
    Liu T; He XG
    Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2006 May; 42(5):403-8. PubMed ID: 16762233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Screening for glaucoma with frequency-doubling technology and Damato campimetry.
    Yamada N; Chen PP; Mills RP; Leen MM; Lieberman MF; Stamper RL; Stanford DC
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1999 Nov; 117(11):1479-84. PubMed ID: 10565516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Trained artificial neural network for glaucoma diagnosis using visual field data: a comparison with conventional algorithms.
    Bizios D; Heijl A; Bengtsson B
    J Glaucoma; 2007 Jan; 16(1):20-8. PubMed ID: 17224745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Sensitivity and specificity of the StratusOCT for perimetric glaucoma.
    Budenz DL; Michael A; Chang RT; McSoley J; Katz J
    Ophthalmology; 2005 Jan; 112(1):3-9. PubMed ID: 15629813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Learning effect among perimetric novices with screening C-20-1 frequency doubling technology perimetry.
    Brush MB; Chen PP
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2004 Mar; 137(3):551-2. PubMed ID: 15013879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Relationship of SITA and full-threshold standard perimetry to frequency-doubling technology perimetry in glaucoma.
    Boden C; Pascual J; Medeiros FA; Aihara M; Weinreb RN; Sample PA
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Jul; 46(7):2433-9. PubMed ID: 15980232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Discriminating ability of Humphrey matrix perimetry in early glaucoma patients.
    Hong S; Chung W; Hong YJ; Seong GJ
    Ophthalmologica; 2007; 221(3):195-9. PubMed ID: 17440283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [FDT versus automated standard perimetry in healthy subjects].
    ChiseliĊ£a D; Ioana MC; Danielescu C; Mihaela NM
    Oftalmologia; 2006; 50(3):99-104. PubMed ID: 17144515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.