These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15491497)

  • 21. Co-evolving residues in membrane proteins.
    Fuchs A; Martin-Galiano AJ; Kalman M; Fleishman S; Ben-Tal N; Frishman D
    Bioinformatics; 2007 Dec; 23(24):3312-9. PubMed ID: 18065429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Identifying folding nucleus based on residue contact networks of proteins.
    Li J; Wang J; Wang W
    Proteins; 2008 Jun; 71(4):1899-907. PubMed ID: 18175318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Support Vector Machine-based classification of protein folds using the structural properties of amino acid residues and amino acid residue pairs.
    Shamim MT; Anwaruddin M; Nagarajaram HA
    Bioinformatics; 2007 Dec; 23(24):3320-7. PubMed ID: 17989092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Amino acid interaction preferences in helical membrane proteins.
    Jha AN; Vishveshwara S; Banavar JR
    Protein Eng Des Sel; 2011 Aug; 24(8):579-88. PubMed ID: 21666247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Protein folding kinetics provides a context-independent assessment of beta-strand propensity in the Fyn SH3 domain.
    Zarrine-Afsar A; Dahesh S; Davidson AR
    J Mol Biol; 2007 Oct; 373(3):764-74. PubMed ID: 17850820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Solvent accessibility, residue charge and residue volume, the three ingredients of a robust amino acid substitution matrix.
    Goodarzi H; Katanforoush A; Torabi N; Najafabadi HS
    J Theor Biol; 2007 Apr; 245(4):715-25. PubMed ID: 17240399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Use of amino acid environment-dependent substitution tables and conformational propensities in structure prediction from aligned sequences of homologous proteins. II. Secondary structures.
    Wako H; Blundell TL
    J Mol Biol; 1994 May; 238(5):693-708. PubMed ID: 8182744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Amino acid distribution rules predict protein fold.
    Kister AE; Potapov V
    Biochem Soc Trans; 2013 Apr; 41(2):616-9. PubMed ID: 23514164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Underlying hydrophobic sequence periodicity of protein tertiary structure.
    Silverman BD
    J Biomol Struct Dyn; 2005 Feb; 22(4):411-23. PubMed ID: 15588105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Evolution and similarity evaluation of protein structures in contact map space.
    Gupta N; Mangal N; Biswas S
    Proteins; 2005 May; 59(2):196-204. PubMed ID: 15726585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. On residues in the disallowed region of the Ramachandran map.
    Pal D; Chakrabarti P
    Biopolymers; 2002 Mar; 63(3):195-206. PubMed ID: 11787007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A dynamical approach to contact distance based protein structure determination.
    Toon A; Williams G
    J Mol Graph Model; 2012 Feb; 32():75-81. PubMed ID: 22088762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Conservation of folding and stability within a protein family: the tyrosine corner as an evolutionary cul-de-sac.
    Hamill SJ; Cota E; Chothia C; Clarke J
    J Mol Biol; 2000 Jan; 295(3):641-9. PubMed ID: 10623553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A statistical model for predicting protein folding rates from amino acid sequence with structural class information.
    Gromiha MM
    J Chem Inf Model; 2005; 45(2):494-501. PubMed ID: 15807515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Amino acid residue doublet propensity in the protein-RNA interface and its application to RNA interface prediction.
    Kim OT; Yura K; Go N
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2006; 34(22):6450-60. PubMed ID: 17130160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The ranging of amino acids substitution matrices of various types in accordance with the alignment accuracy criterion.
    Polyanovsky V; Lifanov A; Esipova N; Tumanyan V
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2020 Sep; 21(Suppl 11):294. PubMed ID: 32921315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Prediction of site-specific amino acid distributions and limits of divergent evolutionary changes in protein sequences.
    Porto M; Roman HE; Vendruscolo M; Bastolla U
    Mol Biol Evol; 2005 Mar; 22(3):630-8. PubMed ID: 15537801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Amino acid contact energy networks impact protein structure and evolution.
    Yan W; Sun M; Hu G; Zhou J; Zhang W; Chen J; Chen B; Shen B
    J Theor Biol; 2014 Aug; 355():95-104. PubMed ID: 24703984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Protein structure comparison using the markov transition model of evolution.
    Kawabata T; Nishikawa K
    Proteins; 2000 Oct; 41(1):108-22. PubMed ID: 10944398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Amino acid propensities for secondary structures are influenced by the protein structural class.
    Costantini S; Colonna G; Facchiano AM
    Biochem Biophys Res Commun; 2006 Apr; 342(2):441-51. PubMed ID: 16487481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.