These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

75 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15491930)

  • 1. A survey about the usefulness of computerized systems to support illness management in clinical practice.
    Ruland CM
    Int J Med Inform; 2004 Nov; 73(11-12):797-805. PubMed ID: 15491930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinicians' perceived usefulness of a support system for patient-centered cancer care.
    Ruland CM
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2006; 124():624-30. PubMed ID: 17108586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A process for developing community consensus regarding the diagnosis and management of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.
    Foy JM; Earls MF
    Pediatrics; 2005 Jan; 115(1):e97-104. PubMed ID: 15629972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.
    Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
    Eur J Health Econ; 2008 Nov; 9 Suppl 1():5-29. PubMed ID: 18987905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effects of a shared decision-making intervention in primary care of depression: a cluster-randomized controlled trial.
    Loh A; Simon D; Wills CE; Kriston L; Niebling W; Härter M
    Patient Educ Couns; 2007 Aug; 67(3):324-32. PubMed ID: 17509808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of a training program for device operators in the Australian Government's Point of Care Testing in General Practice Trial: issues and implications for rural and remote practices.
    Shephard MD; Mazzachi BC; Watkinson L; Shephard AK; Laurence C; Gialamas A; Bubner T
    Rural Remote Health; 2009; 9(3):1189. PubMed ID: 19689171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany].
    Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2008 Dec; 133 Suppl 7():S225-46. PubMed ID: 19034813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An information system to improve financial management, resource allocation and activity planning: evaluation results.
    Ruland CM; Ravn IH
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2001; 84(Pt 2):1203-6. PubMed ID: 11604921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dental screening and referral of young children by pediatric primary care providers.
    dela Cruz GG; Rozier RG; Slade G
    Pediatrics; 2004 Nov; 114(5):e642-52. PubMed ID: 15520094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Perceived adverse patient outcomes correlated to nurses' workload in medical and surgical wards of selected hospitals in Kuwait.
    Al-Kandari F; Thomas D
    J Clin Nurs; 2009 Feb; 18(4):581-90. PubMed ID: 19192005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A taxonomy for disease management: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Disease Management Taxonomy Writing Group.
    Krumholz HM; Currie PM; Riegel B; Phillips CO; Peterson ED; Smith R; Yancy CW; Faxon DP;
    Circulation; 2006 Sep; 114(13):1432-45. PubMed ID: 16952985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The determinants of quality in procedural rural medical care.
    Hays RB; Veitch C; Evans RJ
    Rural Remote Health; 2005; 5(4):473. PubMed ID: 16288583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Systems for implementing best practice for a chronic disease: management of osteoarthritis of the hip and knee.
    Brand C; Cox S
    Intern Med J; 2006 Mar; 36(3):170-9. PubMed ID: 16503952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effects of electronic documentation in the ambulatory surgery setting.
    O'Meara E
    AORN J; 2007 Dec; 86(6):970-9. PubMed ID: 18068402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Patient preference for and reports of provider behavior: impact of symmetry on patient outcomes.
    Cvengros JA; Christensen AJ; Cunningham C; Hillis SL; Kaboli PJ
    Health Psychol; 2009 Nov; 28(6):660-7. PubMed ID: 19916633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Nurses' experiences of and opinions about using standardised care plans in electronic health records--a questionnaire study.
    Dahm MF; Wadensten B
    J Clin Nurs; 2008 Aug; 17(16):2137-45. PubMed ID: 18705735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical decision support systems in the pediatric intensive care unit.
    Mack EH; Wheeler DS; Embi PJ
    Pediatr Crit Care Med; 2009 Jan; 10(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 19057443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Initial evaluation of a computer-based medication management tool in a geriatric clinic.
    Hornick TR; Higgins PA; Stollings C; Wetzel L; Barzilai K; Wolpaw D
    Am J Geriatr Pharmacother; 2006 Mar; 4(1):62-9. PubMed ID: 16730622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Involving the patient: a prospective study on use, appreciation and effectiveness of an information system in head and neck cancer care.
    van den Brink JL; Moorman PW; de Boer MF; Pruyn JF; Verwoerd CD; van Bemmel JH
    Int J Med Inform; 2005 Oct; 74(10):839-49. PubMed ID: 16043392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Information system support as a critical success factor for chronic disease management: Necessary but not sufficient.
    Green CJ; Fortin P; Maclure M; Macgregor A; Robinson S
    Int J Med Inform; 2006 Dec; 75(12):818-28. PubMed ID: 16920013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.