These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

48 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1549263)

  • 1. Change in presentation of breast cancer in a community hospital.
    Palace FM; Magidson JG; Swayne LC
    N J Med; 1992 Feb; 89(2):134-6. PubMed ID: 1549263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Relationship between method of detection of breast cancer and stage of disease, method of treatment, and survival in women aged 40 to 49 years.
    Maibenco D; Daoud Y; Phillips E; Saxe A
    Am Surg; 1999 Nov; 65(11):1061-6. PubMed ID: 10551757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Breast cancer screening in a rural Wisconsin community.
    Venugopalan M; Schmidt EW
    WMJ; 2001; 100(6):32-4. PubMed ID: 11688337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of mass screening mammography on staging of carcinoma of the breast in women.
    Robertson FM; Romanow J; Otchy DP; Walters MJ
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1990 Jul; 171(1):55-8. PubMed ID: 2360150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Geographic association between mammography use and mortality reduction in the US.
    Das B; Feuer EJ; Mariotto A
    Cancer Causes Control; 2005 Aug; 16(6):691-9. PubMed ID: 16049808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Screening for breast cancer.
    Duffy SW; Smith RA; Gabe R; Tabár L; Yen AM; Chen TH
    Surg Oncol Clin N Am; 2005 Oct; 14(4):671-97. PubMed ID: 16226686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impact of mammography on U.S. breast cancer mortality, 1975-2000: are intermediate outcome measures informative?
    Habbema JD; Tan SY; Cronin KA
    J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 2006; (36):105-11. PubMed ID: 17032900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Late-stage breast cancer among women with recent negative screening mammography: do clinical encounters offer opportunity for earlier detection?
    Mouchawar J; Taplin S; Ichikawa L; Barlow WE; Geiger AM; Weinmann S; Gilbert J; Manos MM; Ulcickas Yood M
    J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 2005; (35):39-46. PubMed ID: 16287884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Patterns and predictors of mammography utilization among breast cancer survivors.
    Doubeni CA; Field TS; Ulcickas Yood M; Rolnick SJ; Quessenberry CP; Fouayzi H; Gurwitz JH; Wei F
    Cancer; 2006 Jun; 106(11):2482-8. PubMed ID: 16634097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Treatment of elderly breast cancer patients in a community hospital setting.
    Litvak DA; Arora R
    Arch Surg; 2006 Oct; 141(10):985-90; discussion 990. PubMed ID: 17043276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The 2003 Australian Breast Health Survey: survey design and preliminary results.
    Villanueva EV; Jones S; Nehill C; Favelle S; Steel D; Iverson D; Zorbas H
    BMC Public Health; 2008 Jan; 8():13. PubMed ID: 18194528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Update of the Swedish two-county program of mammographic screening for breast cancer.
    Tabàr L; Fagerberg G; Duffy SW; Day NE; Gad A; Gröntoft O
    Radiol Clin North Am; 1992 Jan; 30(1):187-210. PubMed ID: 1732926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impact of a cancer screening program on breast cancer stage at diagnosis in a medically underserved urban community.
    Oluwole SF; Ali AO; Adu A; Blane BP; Barlow B; Oropeza R; Freeman HP
    J Am Coll Surg; 2003 Feb; 196(2):180-8. PubMed ID: 12595043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Results of mammographic screening at the Mammary Center of Debrecen in 1999 and 2000].
    Simon E; Péter M; Benkó K; Horkay E; Erdélyi G; Péter M; Szúcs-Farkas Z; Tóth J; Kovács I; Fülöp B
    Orv Hetil; 2002 Apr; 143(14):721-3. PubMed ID: 11975392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mammography screening for breast cancer in Copenhagen April 1991-March 1997. Mammography Screening Evaluation Group.
    Lynge E
    APMIS Suppl; 1998; 83():1-44. PubMed ID: 9850674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Impact of mammographic screening on the size and the relative frequency of invasion in breast cancers seen in a community hospital from 1975-1988.
    Bennington JL; Lagios MD; Margolin FR
    Pathology (Phila); 1992; 1(1):11-21. PubMed ID: 9420912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Service screening with mammography in Northern Sweden: effects on breast cancer mortality - an update.
    Jonsson H; Bordás P; Wallin H; Nyström L; Lenner P
    J Med Screen; 2007; 14(2):87-93. PubMed ID: 17626708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Tumor size and breast cancer detection: what might be the effect of a less sensitive screening tool than mammography?
    Duffy SW; Tabar L; Vitak B; Warwick J
    Breast J; 2006; 12 Suppl 1():S91-5. PubMed ID: 16430402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Community Hospitals Indianapolis creates breast cancer awareness. The hospital joins a partnership with local ABC affiliate.
    Herreria J
    Profiles Healthc Mark; 1999; 15(2):24-7, 3. PubMed ID: 10387298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Screening Mammography Program of British Columbia: pattern of use and health care system costs.
    Olivotto IA; Kan L; Mates D; King S
    CMAJ; 1999 Feb; 160(3):337-41. PubMed ID: 10065075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.