390 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15492884)
1. The role of spectral and temporal cues in voice gender discrimination by normal-hearing listeners and cochlear implant users.
Fu QJ; Chinchilla S; Galvin JJ
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2004 Sep; 5(3):253-60. PubMed ID: 15492884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Voice gender identification by cochlear implant users: the role of spectral and temporal resolution.
Fu QJ; Chinchilla S; Nogaki G; Galvin JJ
J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Sep; 118(3 Pt 1):1711-8. PubMed ID: 16240829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Gender identification in younger and older adults: use of spectral and temporal cues in noise-vocoded speech.
Schvartz KC; Chatterjee M
Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):411-20. PubMed ID: 22237163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessment of Spectral and Temporal Resolution in Cochlear Implant Users Using Psychoacoustic Discrimination and Speech Cue Categorization.
Winn MB; Won JH; Moon IJ
Ear Hear; 2016; 37(6):e377-e390. PubMed ID: 27438871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Spectral and temporal cues in cochlear implant speech perception.
Nie K; Barco A; Zeng FG
Ear Hear; 2006 Apr; 27(2):208-17. PubMed ID: 16518146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Music perception with temporal cues in acoustic and electric hearing.
Kong YY; Cruz R; Jones JA; Zeng FG
Ear Hear; 2004 Apr; 25(2):173-85. PubMed ID: 15064662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Vocal emotion recognition by normal-hearing listeners and cochlear implant users.
Xin Luo ; Fu QJ; Galvin JJ
Trends Amplif; 2007 Dec; 11(4):301-15. PubMed ID: 18003871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Human Frequency Following Responses to Vocoded Speech.
Ananthakrishnan S; Luo X; Krishnan A
Ear Hear; 2017; 38(5):e256-e267. PubMed ID: 28362674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Speech recognition in noise as a function of the number of spectral channels: comparison of acoustic hearing and cochlear implants.
Friesen LM; Shannon RV; Baskent D; Wang X
J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Aug; 110(2):1150-63. PubMed ID: 11519582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Voice gender discrimination provides a measure of more than pitch-related perception in cochlear implant users.
Li T; Fu QJ
Int J Audiol; 2011 Aug; 50(8):498-502. PubMed ID: 21696330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Vowel identification by cochlear implant users: contributions of static and dynamic spectral cues.
Donaldson GS; Rogers CL; Cardenas ES; Russell BA; Hanna NH
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Oct; 134(4):3021-8. PubMed ID: 24116437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Timbre and speech perception in bimodal and bilateral cochlear-implant listeners.
Kong YY; Mullangi A; Marozeau J
Ear Hear; 2012; 33(5):645-59. PubMed ID: 22677814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Perception of vowels and prosody by cochlear implant recipients in noise.
Van Zyl M; Hanekom JJ
J Commun Disord; 2013; 46(5-6):449-64. PubMed ID: 24157128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Relative contributions of spectral and temporal cues for phoneme recognition.
Xu L; Thompson CS; Pfingst BE
J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 May; 117(5):3255-67. PubMed ID: 15957791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Spectro-temporal cues enhance modulation sensitivity in cochlear implant users.
Zheng Y; Escabí M; Litovsky RY
Hear Res; 2017 Aug; 351():45-54. PubMed ID: 28601530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of envelope bandwidth on importance functions for cochlear implant simulations.
Whitmal NA; DeMaio D; Lin R
J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Feb; 137(2):733-44. PubMed ID: 25698008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Gender categorization in cochlear implant users.
Massida Z; Marx M; Belin P; James C; Fraysse B; Barone P; Deguine O
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2013 Oct; 56(5):1389-401. PubMed ID: 24023381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Spectral and temporal cues for speech recognition: implications for auditory prostheses.
Xu L; Pfingst BE
Hear Res; 2008 Aug; 242(1-2):132-40. PubMed ID: 18249077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Voice discrimination in cochlear-implanted deaf subjects.
Massida Z; Belin P; James C; Rouger J; Fraysse B; Barone P; Deguine O
Hear Res; 2011 May; 275(1-2):120-9. PubMed ID: 21167924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Noise susceptibility of cochlear implant users: the role of spectral resolution and smearing.
Fu QJ; Nogaki G
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2005 Mar; 6(1):19-27. PubMed ID: 15735937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
