390 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15492884)
21. Discrimination of Voice Pitch and Vocal-Tract Length in Cochlear Implant Users.
Gaudrain E; Başkent D
Ear Hear; 2018; 39(2):226-237. PubMed ID: 28799983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Effects of vowel context on the recognition of initial and medial consonants by cochlear implant users.
Donaldson GS; Kreft HA
Ear Hear; 2006 Dec; 27(6):658-77. PubMed ID: 17086077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Reverberation Degrades Pitch Perception but Not Mandarin Tone and Vowel Recognition of Cochlear Implant Users.
Xu L; Luo J; Xie D; Chao X; Wang R; Zahorik P; Luo X
Ear Hear; 2022 Jul-Aug 01; 43(4):1139-1150. PubMed ID: 34799495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Factors affecting speech understanding in gated interference: cochlear implant users and normal-hearing listeners.
Nelson PB; Jin SH
J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 May; 115(5 Pt 1):2286-94. PubMed ID: 15139640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Voice gender perception by cochlear implantees.
Kovacić D; Balaban E
J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Aug; 126(2):762-75. PubMed ID: 19640042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Enhancement of temporal periodicity cues in cochlear implants: effects on prosodic perception and vowel identification.
Green T; Faulkner A; Rosen S; Macherey O
J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Jul; 118(1):375-85. PubMed ID: 16119358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Factors limiting vocal-tract length discrimination in cochlear implant simulations.
Gaudrain E; Başkent D
J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Mar; 137(3):1298-308. PubMed ID: 25786943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Vowel identification by cochlear implant users: Contributions of duration cues and dynamic spectral cues.
Donaldson GS; Rogers CL; Johnson LB; Oh SH
J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jul; 138(1):65-73. PubMed ID: 26233007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Within-subjects comparison of the HiRes and Fidelity120 speech processing strategies: speech perception and its relation to place-pitch sensitivity.
Donaldson GS; Dawson PK; Borden LZ
Ear Hear; 2011; 32(2):238-50. PubMed ID: 21084987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Effects of talker variability on vowel recognition in cochlear implants.
Chang YP; Fu QJ
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2006 Dec; 49(6):1331-41. PubMed ID: 17197499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Accuracy of cochlear implant recipients on pitch perception, melody recognition, and speech reception in noise.
Gfeller K; Turner C; Oleson J; Zhang X; Gantz B; Froman R; Olszewski C
Ear Hear; 2007 Jun; 28(3):412-23. PubMed ID: 17485990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Spectral peak resolution and speech recognition in quiet: normal hearing, hearing impaired, and cochlear implant listeners.
Henry BA; Turner CW; Behrens A
J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Aug; 118(2):1111-21. PubMed ID: 16158665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Spectral Contrast Effects Reveal Different Acoustic Cues for Vowel Recognition in Cochlear-Implant Users.
Feng L; Oxenham AJ
Ear Hear; 2020; 41(4):990-997. PubMed ID: 31815819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Minimum spectral contrast needed for vowel identification by normal hearing and cochlear implant listeners.
Loizou PC; Poroy O
J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Sep; 110(3 Pt 1):1619-27. PubMed ID: 11572371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Effects of noise and spectral resolution on vowel and consonant recognition: acoustic and electric hearing.
Fu QJ; Shannon RV; Wang X
J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Dec; 104(6):3586-96. PubMed ID: 9857517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Voice gender and the segregation of competing talkers: Perceptual learning in cochlear implant simulations.
Sullivan JR; Assmann PF; Hossain S; Schafer EC
J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Mar; 141(3):1643. PubMed ID: 28372046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Psychophysical performance and Mandarin tone recognition in noise by cochlear implant users.
Wei C; Cao K; Jin X; Chen X; Zeng FG
Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2 Suppl):62S-65S. PubMed ID: 17496650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Age-related changes in talker recognition with reduced spectral cues.
Vongpaisal T; Trehub SE; Glenn Schellenberg E; van Lieshout P
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Jan; 131(1):501-8. PubMed ID: 22280611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Spectral-Temporal Trade-Off in Vocoded Sentence Recognition: Effects of Age, Hearing Thresholds, and Working Memory.
Shader MJ; Yancey CM; Gordon-Salant S; Goupell MJ
Ear Hear; 2020; 41(5):1226-1235. PubMed ID: 32032222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Children With Normal Hearing Are Efficient Users of Fundamental Frequency and Vocal Tract Length Cues for Voice Discrimination.
Zaltz Y; Goldsworthy RL; Eisenberg LS; Kishon-Rabin L
Ear Hear; 2020; 41(1):182-193. PubMed ID: 31107364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
