These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

53 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1549333)

  • 21. The effect of soft tissue properties on spinal flexibility in scoliosis: biomechanical simulation of fulcrum bending.
    Little JP; Adam CJ
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Jan; 34(2):E76-82. PubMed ID: 19139657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effect of an interspinous implant on loads in the lumbar spine.
    Rohlmann A; Zander T; Burra NK; Bergmann G
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2005 Oct; 50(10):343-7. PubMed ID: 16300050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Fast development of high intra-abdominal pressure when a trained participant is exposed to heavy, sudden trunk loads.
    Essendrop M; Trojel Hye-Knudsen C; Skotte J; Faber Hansen A; Schibye B
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Jan; 29(1):94-9. PubMed ID: 14699283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A combined finite element and optimization investigation of lumbar spine mechanics with and without muscles.
    Goel VK; Kong W; Han JS; Weinstein JN; Gilbertson LG
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1993 Sep; 18(11):1531-41. PubMed ID: 8235826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Biomechanical evaluation of a new total posterior-element replacement system.
    Wilke HJ; Schmidt H; Werner K; Schmölz W; Drumm J
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Nov; 31(24):2790-6; discussion 2797. PubMed ID: 17108830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Measurement and analysis of the in vivo posteroanterior impulse response of the human thoracolumbar spine: a feasibility study.
    Nathan M; Keller TS
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1994 Sep; 17(7):431-41. PubMed ID: 7989876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Interdependence of lumbar disc and subdiscal bone properties: a report of the normal and degenerated spine.
    Keller TS; Ziv I; Moeljanto E; Spengler DM
    J Spinal Disord; 1993 Apr; 6(2):106-13. PubMed ID: 8504221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A thoracic and lumbar spine injury severity classification based on neurologic function grade, spinal canal deformity, and spinal biomechanical stability.
    Tsou PM; Wang J; Khoo L; Shamie AN; Holly L
    Spine J; 2006; 6(6):636-47. PubMed ID: 17088194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Biomechanical analysis of rotational motions after disc arthroplasty: implications for patients with adult deformities.
    McAfee PC; Cunningham BW; Hayes V; Sidiqi F; Dabbah M; Sefter JC; Hu N; Beatson H
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Sep; 31(19 Suppl):S152-60. PubMed ID: 16946633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Influence of screw positioning in a new anterior spine fixator on implant loosening in osteoporotic vertebrae.
    Reinhold M; Schwieger K; Goldhahn J; Linke B; Knop C; Blauth M
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Feb; 31(4):406-13. PubMed ID: 16481950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. An instrumented implant for vertebral body replacement that measures loads in the anterior spinal column.
    Rohlmann A; Gabel U; Graichen F; Bender A; Bergmann G
    Med Eng Phys; 2007 Jun; 29(5):580-5. PubMed ID: 16931099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Contribution to the study of pelvic stress during weight-bearing. Role of the pubic branch and trabecular bone].
    Fabeck L; Descamps PY; Bourgois R; Dhem A
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 1994; 80(3):181-7. PubMed ID: 7899636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Outcome assessment in lumbar spine surgery.
    Zanoli G
    Acta Orthop Suppl; 2005 Jun; 76(318):5-47. PubMed ID: 16175972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Instrumental measures of spinal function: is it worth? A state-of-the art from a clinical perspective.
    Don R; Capodaglio P; Cimolin V; Benedetti MG; D'Osualdo F; Frigo C; Vismara L; Negrini S
    Eur J Phys Rehabil Med; 2012 Jun; 48(2):255-73. PubMed ID: 22510675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A method for the identification of in-vivo segmental stiffness properties of the spine.
    Vanderby R; Daniele M; Patwardhan A; Bunch W
    J Biomech Eng; 1986 Nov; 108(4):312-6. PubMed ID: 3795875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. An optimisation approach of a new dynamic spinal device.
    Monede Hocquard L; Gille O; Mesnard M
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2012; 15 Suppl 1():321-3. PubMed ID: 23009525
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparison of static and dynamic biomechanical models.
    Leskinen TP
    Ergonomics; 1985 Jan; 28(1):285-91. PubMed ID: 3996365
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The essentials of spine biomechanics for the general neurosurgeon.
    Benzel EC
    Clin Neurosurg; 2003; 50():86-177. PubMed ID: 14677437
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Biomechanical testing of the spine. Load-controlled versus displacement-controlled analysis.
    Goel VK; Wilder DG; Pope MH; Edwards WT
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1995 Nov; 20(21):2354-7. PubMed ID: 8553127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Mechanical, statistical and roentgenological aspects of the spine].
    Stricker HF
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1967 Sep; 111(37):1643-4. PubMed ID: 6078642
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.