BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15493516)

  • 41. Fast genomic prediction of breeding values using parallel Markov chain Monte Carlo with convergence diagnosis.
    Guo P; Zhu B; Niu H; Wang Z; Liang Y; Chen Y; Zhang L; Ni H; Guo Y; Hay EHA; Gao X; Gao H; Wu X; Xu L; Li J
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2018 Jan; 19(1):3. PubMed ID: 29298666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. The Behavior of Metropolis-Coupled Markov Chains When Sampling Rugged Phylogenetic Distributions.
    Brown JM; Thomson RC
    Syst Biol; 2018 Jul; 67(4):729-734. PubMed ID: 29462409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Invited commentary: Lost in estimation--searching for alternatives to markov chains to fit complex Bayesian models.
    Molitor J
    Am J Epidemiol; 2012 Mar; 175(5):376-8; discussion 379-80. PubMed ID: 22306561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. A survey of population analysis methods and software for complex pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic models with examples.
    Bauer RJ; Guzy S; Ng C
    AAPS J; 2007 Mar; 9(1):E60-83. PubMed ID: 17408237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Identifiability and convergence issues for Markov chain Monte Carlo fitting of spatial models.
    Eberly LE; Carlin BP
    Stat Med; 2000 Sep 15-30; 19(17-18):2279-94. PubMed ID: 10960853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Population and individual minimal modeling of the frequently sampled insulin-modified intravenous glucose tolerance test.
    Erichsen L; Agbaje OF; Luzio SD; Owens DR; Hovorka R
    Metabolism; 2004 Oct; 53(10):1349-54. PubMed ID: 15375793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. The application of a Bayesian approach to the analysis of a complex, mechanistically based model.
    Jonsson F; Jonsson EN; Bois FY; Marshall S
    J Biopharm Stat; 2007; 17(1):65-92. PubMed ID: 17219756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. A Bayesian meta-analysis on published sample mean and variance pharmacokinetic data with application to drug-drug interaction prediction.
    Yu M; Kim S; Wang Z; Hall S; Li L
    J Biopharm Stat; 2008; 18(6):1063-83. PubMed ID: 18991108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Fitting genetic models using Markov Chain Monte Carlo algorithms with BUGS.
    van den Berg SM; Beem L; Boomsma DI
    Twin Res Hum Genet; 2006 Jun; 9(3):334-42. PubMed ID: 16790144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Reparametrization-based estimation of genetic parameters in multi-trait animal model using Integrated Nested Laplace Approximation.
    Mathew B; Holand AM; Koistinen P; Léon J; Sillanpää MJ
    Theor Appl Genet; 2016 Feb; 129(2):215-25. PubMed ID: 26582509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Bayesian bivariate meta-analysis of diagnostic test studies using integrated nested Laplace approximations.
    Paul M; Riebler A; Bachmann LM; Rue H; Held L
    Stat Med; 2010 May; 29(12):1325-39. PubMed ID: 20101670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Weighted maximum posterior marginals for random fields using an ensemble of conditional densities from multiple Markov chain Monte Carlo simulations.
    Monaco JP; Madabhushi A
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2011 Jul; 30(7):1353-64. PubMed ID: 21335309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. More stable estimation of the STARTS model: A Bayesian approach using Markov chain Monte Carlo techniques.
    Lüdtke O; Robitzsch A; Wagner J
    Psychol Methods; 2018 Sep; 23(3):570-593. PubMed ID: 29172612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Application of the Bayesian dynamic survival model in medicine.
    He J; McGee DL; Niu X
    Stat Med; 2010 Feb; 29(3):347-60. PubMed ID: 20014356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. A comparison of computational algorithms for the Bayesian analysis of clinical trials.
    Chen Z; Berger JS; Castellucci LA; Farkouh M; Goligher EC; Hade EM; Hunt BJ; Kornblith LZ; Lawler PR; Leifer ES; Lorenzi E; Neal MD; Zarychanski R; Heath A
    Clin Trials; 2024 May; ():17407745241247334. PubMed ID: 38752434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. A menu-driven software package of Bayesian nonparametric (and parametric) mixed models for regression analysis and density estimation.
    Karabatsos G
    Behav Res Methods; 2017 Feb; 49(1):335-362. PubMed ID: 26956682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Estimation of evolutionary parameters using short, random and partial sequences from mixed samples of anonymous individuals.
    Wu SH; Rodrigo AG
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2015 Nov; 16():357. PubMed ID: 26536860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Evaluations of Bayesian and maximum likelihood methods in PK models with below-quantification-limit data.
    Yang S; Roger J
    Pharm Stat; 2010; 9(4):313-30. PubMed ID: 20043295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Incorporating parameter uncertainty into Quantitative Microbial Risk Assessment (QMRA).
    Donald M; Mengersen K; Toze S; Sidhu JP; Cook A
    J Water Health; 2011 Mar; 9(1):10-26. PubMed ID: 21301111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Phylogenetic MCMC algorithms are misleading on mixtures of trees.
    Mossel E; Vigoda E
    Science; 2005 Sep; 309(5744):2207-9. PubMed ID: 16195459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 58.