197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15494779)
1. Cardiac rehabilitation: Cost and care effective.
Stone J
Can J Cardiol; 2004 Oct; 20(12):1256-7. PubMed ID: 15494779
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Comprehensive cardiac rehabilitation: is it cost-effective?
Oldridge NB
Eur Heart J; 1998 Nov; 19 Suppl O():O42-50. PubMed ID: 9857950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Community or patient preferences for cost-effectiveness of cardiac rehabilitation: does it matter?
Oldridge N; Furlong W; Perkins A; Feeny D; Torrance GW
Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil; 2008 Oct; 15(5):608-15. PubMed ID: 18800005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [The cost-benefit of cardiac rehabilitation programs].
Coll R
Rev Esp Cardiol; 1995; 48 Suppl 1():94-8. PubMed ID: 7644830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comprehensive cardiac rehabilitation: a cost assessment based on a randomized clinical trial.
Kruse M; Hochstrasser S; Zwisler AD; Kjellberg J
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2006; 22(4):478-83. PubMed ID: 16984681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Outcomes of cardiac rehabilitation treatment and cost-effectiveness relations--A comparison between inpatient and outpatient rehabilitation programmes].
Vom Orde A; Schott T; Iseringhausen O
Rehabilitation (Stuttg); 2002; 41(2-3):119-29. PubMed ID: 12007036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Home-based cardiac rehabilitation versus hospital-based rehabilitation: a cost effectiveness analysis.
Taylor RS; Watt A; Dalal HM; Evans PH; Campbell JL; Read KL; Mourant AJ; Wingham J; Thompson DR; Pereira Gray DJ
Int J Cardiol; 2007 Jul; 119(2):196-201. PubMed ID: 17084927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Position of the German Society for Prevention and Rehabilitation in Vascular Disease, DGPR on the study under the Health and Pension Insurance Scheme's Recommendation on Outpatient/Inpatient Rehabilitation: A. vom Orde et al., "Outcomes of cardiac rehabilitation treatment and cost-effectiveness relations--A comparison between inpatient and outpatient rehabilitation programmes"].
Held K;
Rehabilitation (Stuttg); 2004 Apr; 43(2):123-4. PubMed ID: 15160704
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Nursing care costs for a DRG sub-group.
Stefan S; Gillies DA; Biordi D
Nurs Econ; 1992; 10(4):277-81, 310. PubMed ID: 1508278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Ischemic burden, treatment allocation, and outcomes in stable coronary artery disease.
Farzaneh-Far A; Borges-Neto S
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2011 Nov; 4(6):746-53. PubMed ID: 22086945
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Need cardiac rehabilitation be cost-effective?
Perk J
J Cardiovasc Risk; 1996 Apr; 3(2):167-71. PubMed ID: 8836858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The economics of cardiac rehabilitation and lifestyle modification: a review of literature.
Lee AJ; Strickler GK; Shepard DS
J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev; 2007; 27(3):135-42. PubMed ID: 17558193
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [Rehabilitation after myocardial infarction or coronary surgery: elderly patients may benefit as much as the younger ones].
Perk J
Lakartidningen; 1998 Sep; 95(36):3778, 3781-4. PubMed ID: 9766137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Quality indicators in cardiovascular care: the case for cardiac rehabilitation.
Thomas RJ; Witt BJ; Lopez-Jimenez F; King ML; Squires RW
J Cardiopulm Rehabil; 2005; 25(5):249-56. PubMed ID: 16217225
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. How much do the benefits cost? Effects of a home-based training programme on cardiovascular fitness, quality of life, programme cost and adherence for patients with coronary disease.
Salvetti XM; Oliveira JA; Servantes DM; Vincenzo de Paola AA
Clin Rehabil; 2008; 22(10-11):987-96. PubMed ID: 18955430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cost-effectiveness of clopidogrel in myocardial infarction with ST-segment elevation: a European model based on the CLARITY and COMMIT trials.
Berg J; Lindgren P; Spiesser J; Parry D; Jönsson B
Clin Ther; 2007 Jun; 29(6):1184-202. PubMed ID: 17692733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Impact of program duration and contact frequency on efficacy and cost of cardiac rehabilitation: results of a randomized trial.
Reid RD; Dafoe WA; Morrin L; Mayhew A; Papadakis S; Beaton L; Oldridge NB; Coyle D; Wells GA
Am Heart J; 2005 May; 149(5):862-8. PubMed ID: 15894969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Acute coronary syndromes in Europe: 1-year costs and outcomes.
Taylor MJ; Scuffham PA; McCollam PL; Newby DE
Curr Med Res Opin; 2007 Mar; 23(3):495-503. PubMed ID: 17355731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. NSF for CHD: 3 years of 12-month follow-up audit after cardiac rehabilitation.
Evans JA; Bethell HJ; Turner SC
J Public Health (Oxf); 2006 Mar; 28(1):35-8. PubMed ID: 16251258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Home-based versus hospital-based rehabilitation after myocardial infarction: A randomized trial with preference arms--Cornwall Heart Attack Rehabilitation Management Study (CHARMS).
Dalal HM; Evans PH; Campbell JL; Taylor RS; Watt A; Read KL; Mourant AJ; Wingham J; Thompson DR; Pereira Gray DJ
Int J Cardiol; 2007 Jul; 119(2):202-11. PubMed ID: 17196274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
