These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1549525)

  • 1. A comparison of the auscultated acceleration test and the nonstress test as predictors of perinatal outcomes.
    Paine LL; Benedict MI; Strobino DM; Gegor CL; Larson EL
    Nurs Res; 1992; 41(2):87-91. PubMed ID: 1549525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Nonstress testing and perinatal outcome.
    Rayburn W; Greene J; Donaldson M
    J Reprod Med; 1980 May; 24(5):191-6. PubMed ID: 7401050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of two time intervals for the ausculated acceleration test.
    Paine LL; Zanardi LR; Johnson TR; Rorie JA; Barger MK
    J Midwifery Womens Health; 2001; 46(2):98-102. PubMed ID: 11370697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparative study of stressed and nonstressed antepartum fetal heart rate testing.
    Keane MW; Horger EO; Vice L
    Obstet Gynecol; 1981 Mar; 57(3):320-4. PubMed ID: 7465146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Contraction stress test versus ductus venosus Doppler evaluation for the prediction of adverse perinatal outcome in growth-restricted fetuses with non-reassuring non-stress test.
    Figueras F; Martínez JM; Puerto B; Coll O; Cararach V; Vanrell JA
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Mar; 21(3):250-5. PubMed ID: 12666219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Antepartum fetal heart testing: a clinical appraisal.
    Goldkrand JW; Benjamin DS
    Obstet Gynecol; 1984 Jan; 63(1):48-51. PubMed ID: 6691017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Amniotic fluid index and perinatal morbidity.
    Dizon-Townson D; Kennedy KA; Dildy GA; Wu J; Egger M; Clark SL
    Am J Perinatol; 1996 May; 13(4):231-4. PubMed ID: 8724725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Short fetal acoustic stimulation test for rapid antepartum assessment of fetal well-being.
    Tannirandorn Y; Kittipibul V
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2001 Apr; 84(4):520-4. PubMed ID: 11460963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The biophysical profile and the nonstress test: poor predictors of chorioamnionitis and fetal infection in prolonged preterm premature rupture of membranes.
    Del Valle GO; Joffe GM; Izquierdo LA; Smith JF; Gilson GJ; Curet LB
    Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Jul; 80(1):106-10. PubMed ID: 1603478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical study on detecting false non-reactive of non-stress test by improved acoustic stimulation.
    Xi Q; Du J; Liu X; Shao L
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2011 Aug; 284(2):271-4. PubMed ID: 20677022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of the manual stimulation test and the nonstress test: a randomized controlled trial.
    Piyamongkol W; Trungtawatchai S; Chanprapaph P; Tongsong T
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2006 Dec; 89(12):1999-2002. PubMed ID: 17214048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Predictability of complications associated with prolongation of pregnancy.
    Arias F
    Obstet Gynecol; 1987 Jul; 70(1):101-6. PubMed ID: 3299174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fetal surveillance. Should it begin at 40 weeks' gestation in a low-risk population?
    Rosen DJ; Michaeli G; Markov S; Greenspoon JS; Goldberger SB; Fejgin MD
    J Reprod Med; 1995 Feb; 40(2):135-9. PubMed ID: 7738924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Predictive value of the nonreactive nonstress test in evaluating neonatal outcome.
    Bhide A; Bhattacharya MS
    J Postgrad Med; 1990 Apr; 36(2):104-5. PubMed ID: 2097363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The nonstress test.
    Devoe LD
    Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am; 1990 Mar; 17(1):111-28. PubMed ID: 2192314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Perinatal outcome with the modified biophysical profile.
    Nageotte MP; Towers CV; Asrat T; Freeman RK
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Jun; 170(6):1672-6. PubMed ID: 8203424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prenatal surveillance using nonstress testing and Doppler velocimetry.
    Farmakides G; Schulman H; Winter D; Ducey J; Guzman E; Penny B
    Obstet Gynecol; 1988 Feb; 71(2):184-7. PubMed ID: 2962024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Auscultated fetal heart rate accelerations. An alternative to the nonstress test.
    Daniels SM; Boehm N
    J Nurse Midwifery; 1991; 36(2):88-94. PubMed ID: 2037878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Antepartum fetal heart rate testing in preterm pregnancy.
    Devoe LD
    Obstet Gynecol; 1982 Oct; 60(4):431-6. PubMed ID: 7121929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Antepartum testing in postterm pregnancy.
    Benedetti TJ; Easterling T
    J Reprod Med; 1988 Mar; 33(3):252-8. PubMed ID: 3283352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.