These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

282 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15495501)

  • 1. [ART or conventional restorations? A final evaluation of proximal restorations in deciduous molars].
    van den Dungen GM; Huddleston Slater AE; van Amerongen WE
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 2004 Sep; 111(9):345-9. PubMed ID: 15495501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Survival of self-etch adhesive Class II composite restorations using ART and conventional cavity preparations in primary molars.
    Eden E; Topaloglu-Ak A; Frencken JE; van't Hof M
    Am J Dent; 2006 Dec; 19(6):359-63. PubMed ID: 17212078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. One-year survival of occlusal ART restorations in primary molars placed with and without cavity conditioner.
    Yassen G
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2009; 76(2):136-41. PubMed ID: 19619427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. One-year evaluation of atraumatic restorative treatment and minimum intervention techniques on primary teeth.
    Louw AJ; Sarvan I; Chikte UM; Honkala E
    SADJ; 2002 Sep; 57(9):366-71. PubMed ID: 12494713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A 3-year clinical evaluation of Ketac-Silver restorations in primary molars.
    Holst A
    Swed Dent J; 1996; 20(6):209-14. PubMed ID: 9065982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical evaluation of composite and compomer restorations in primary teeth: 24-month results.
    Pascon FM; Kantovitz KR; Caldo-Teixeira AS; Borges AF; Silva TN; Puppin-Rontani RM; Garcia-Godoy F
    J Dent; 2006 Jul; 34(6):381-8. PubMed ID: 16242232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinical evaluation of glass-ionomer tunnel restorations in primary molars: 36 months results.
    Markovic D; Peric T
    Aust Dent J; 2008 Mar; 53(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 18304240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical evaluation of atraumatic restorations in primary molars: a comparison between 2 glass ionomer cements.
    Menezes JP; Rosenblatt A; Medeiros E
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2006; 73(2):91-7. PubMed ID: 16948370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Three-year survival of single- and two-surface ART restorations in a high-caries child population.
    van Gemert-Schriks MC; van Amerongen WE; ten Cate JM; Aartman IH
    Clin Oral Investig; 2007 Dec; 11(4):337-43. PubMed ID: 17710452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Caries control and other variables associated with success of primary molar vital pulp therapy.
    Vij R; Coll JA; Shelton P; Farooq NS
    Pediatr Dent; 2004; 26(3):214-20. PubMed ID: 15185801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Split mouth randomized controlled clinical trial of beveled cavity preparations in primary molars: an 18-Month follow up.
    Oliveira CA; Dias PF; Dos Santos MP; Maia LC
    J Dent; 2008 Sep; 36(9):754-8. PubMed ID: 18579283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessment of glass polyalkenoate restorations in primary molar teeth.
    Attwood D; Reid JS; Evans D
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 1994 Jun; 2(4):183-5. PubMed ID: 8603144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical evaluation of Dyract in primary molars: 3-year results.
    Roeters JJ; Frankenmolen F; Burgersdijk RC; Peters TC
    Am J Dent; 1998 Jun; 11(3):143-8. PubMed ID: 9823078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Flowable resin composite as a class II restorative in primary molars: A two-year clinical evaluation.
    Andersson-Wenckert I; Sunnegårdh-Grönberg K
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2006 Nov; 64(6):334-40. PubMed ID: 17123909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Proximoclusal composite restorations in primary molars: a two-year follow-up.
    Leifler E; Varpio M
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1981; 48(6):411-6. PubMed ID: 6946081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Composite restorations for primary molars: results after four years.
    Oldenburg TR; Vann WF; Dilley DC
    Pediatr Dent; 1987 Jun; 9(2):136-43. PubMed ID: 3475683
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Restoring proximal lesions in the primary dentition: is glass ionomer cement the material of choice?
    Scott JM; Mahoney EK
    N Z Dent J; 2003 Sep; 99(3):65-71. PubMed ID: 15328832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Restoration of primary anterior teeth: review of the literature.
    Lee JK
    Pediatr Dent; 2002; 24(5):506-10. PubMed ID: 12412966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A one-year clinical evaluation of a high-viscosity glass ionomer cement in primary molars.
    Yilmaz Y; Eyuboglu O; Kocogullari ME; Belduz N
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2006 Feb; 7(1):71-8. PubMed ID: 16491149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Two years survival rate of Class II ART restorations in primary molars using two ways to avoid saliva contamination.
    Carvalho TS; Sampaio FC; Diniz A; Bönecker M; Van Amerongen WE
    Int J Paediatr Dent; 2010 Nov; 20(6):419-25. PubMed ID: 20642474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.