220 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15495741)
1. Supreme Court clarifies the breadth of ERISA preemption.
Hershey N
Hosp Law Newsl; 2004 Oct; 21(12):1-7. PubMed ID: 15495741
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. U.S. Supreme Court wades into ERISA one more time.
Roeder KH; Rees JS
GHA Today; 2004 Aug; 48(7):3, 9. PubMed ID: 15500273
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The impact of the recent Supreme Court rulings in Pegram and Rush Prudential on state regulation of managed care organizations.
Trueman DL
J Health Law; 2003; 36(1):107-32. PubMed ID: 12784923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Supreme Court rules HMO suits are preempted.
Prieto-Gonzalez M
J Law Med Ethics; 2004; 32(4):774-6. PubMed ID: 15807366
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Aetna Health, Inc. v. Davila: Implications for public health policy.
Rosenbaum S; Teitelbaum J
Public Health Rep; 2004; 119(5):510-2. PubMed ID: 15313115
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Will the Supreme Court finally eliminate ERISA preemption?
Trueman DL
Ann Health Law; 2004; 13(2):427-64, table of contents. PubMed ID: 15281484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. ERISA preemption remains on the front burner.
Hosp Law Newsl; 2004 Mar; 21(5):1-6. PubMed ID: 15011608
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The final chapter (maybe) of preemption of HMO accountability under state law.
Jordan K
Health Care Law Mon; 2004 Feb; ():15-27. PubMed ID: 14989070
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. ERISA preemption conflict in the Third Circuit.
Cassidy MA
Health Care Law Mon; 2002 Dec; ():8-11. PubMed ID: 12596431
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. ERISA preemption: will the elimination of the ERISA preemption clause help or harm America's ability to deal with its pending health care crisis?
Taylor DH
J Law Health; 1999-2000; 14(1):133-78. PubMed ID: 11187365
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. ERISA. Employee Retirement Income Security Act.
Berlin L
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Jan; 174(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 10628447
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The Supreme Court and managed-care liability.
Erb CT; Rich RF
N Engl J Med; 2005 Jan; 352(2):201-3; author reply 201-3. PubMed ID: 15647587
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Supreme Court rejects preemption in ERISA benefits dispute. Rush Prudential, Inc. v. Moran.
Morreim EH
Hosp Law Newsl; 2002 Nov; 20(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 12412312
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Supreme Court to decide whether ERISA pre-empts negligence claims against HMOs.
Sfikas PM
J Am Dent Assoc; 2004 Jan; 135(1):110-2. PubMed ID: 14959884
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Pegram v. Herdrich: a victory for HMOs or the beginning of the end for ERISA preemption?
Borzi PC
Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics; 2001; 1():161-9. PubMed ID: 12669325
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. ERISA preemption and the legal liability of HMOs: possibilities for change.
Lynk MV
J Natl Med Assoc; 1998 Nov; 90(11):645-7. PubMed ID: 9828578
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The swinging pendulum: the Supreme Court reverses course on ERISA and managed care.
Kesselheim AS; Brennan TA
Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics; 2005; 5(1):451-63. PubMed ID: 15742588
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Supreme Court limits HMO lawsuits.
Fine A
Manag Care Q; 2004; 12(3):13-4. PubMed ID: 15702562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Vicarious liability: is ERISA preemption a successful defense?
Lederberg MB
Med Health R I; 1997 Feb; 80(2):69-70. PubMed ID: 9046780
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. HMOs, accountability, and the death of ERISA preemption.
Zaremski MJ
J Leg Med; 2002 Dec; 23(4):547-62. PubMed ID: 12495544
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
