These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15495898)

  • 1. An analysis of the time course of attention in preview search.
    Humphreys GW; Stalmann BJ; Olivers C
    Percept Psychophys; 2004 Jul; 66(5):713-30. PubMed ID: 15495898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Object-based inhibitory priming in preview search: evidence from the "top-up" procedure.
    Kunar MA; Humphreys GW
    Mem Cognit; 2006 Apr; 34(3):459-74. PubMed ID: 16933757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. No previews are good news: using preview search to probe categorical grouping for orientation.
    Hodsoll JP; Humphreys GW
    Vision Res; 2007 May; 47(11):1464-78. PubMed ID: 17433399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Parieto-occipital areas involved in efficient filtering in search: a time course analysis of visual marking using behavioural and functional imaging procedures.
    Humphreys GW; Kyllingsbaek S; Watson DG; Olivers CN; Law I; Paulson OB
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2004 May; 57(4):610-35. PubMed ID: 15204126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Revisiting preview search at isoluminance: new onsets are not necessary for the preview advantage.
    Braithwaite JJ; Humphreys GW; Watson DG; Hulleman J
    Percept Psychophys; 2005 Oct; 67(7):1214-28. PubMed ID: 16502843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Color-based grouping and inhibition in visual search: evidence from a probe detection analysis of preview search.
    Braithwaite JJ; Humphreys GW; Hulleman J
    Percept Psychophys; 2005 Jan; 67(1):81-101. PubMed ID: 15912874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Does previewing one stimulus feature help conjunction search?
    Olds ES; Fockler KA
    Perception; 2004; 33(2):195-216. PubMed ID: 15109162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Is it impossible to inhibit isoluminant items, or does it simply take longer? Evidence from preview search.
    Braithwaite JJ; Hulleman J; Watson DG; Humphreys GW
    Percept Psychophys; 2006 Feb; 68(2):290-300. PubMed ID: 16773900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prioritized selection in visual search through onset capture and color inhibition: evidence from a probe-dot detection task.
    Agter F; Donk M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2005 Aug; 31(4):722-30. PubMed ID: 16131245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The spatial distribution of inhibition in preview search.
    Osugi T; Kumada T; Kawahara J
    Vision Res; 2009 Mar; 49(8):851-61. PubMed ID: 19275913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The preview benefit in single-feature and conjunction search: Constraints of visual marking.
    Meinhardt G; Persike M
    J Vis; 2015; 15(13):13. PubMed ID: 26382004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Selection of new objects by onset capture and visual marking.
    Osugi T; Hayashi D; Murakami I
    Vision Res; 2016 May; 122():21-33. PubMed ID: 27001341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Inhibition and anticipation in visual search: evidence from effects of color foreknowledge on preview search.
    Braithwaite JJ; Humphreys GW
    Percept Psychophys; 2003 Feb; 65(2):213-37. PubMed ID: 12713240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Visual marking across eye blinks.
    Irwin DE; Humphreys GW
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2013 Feb; 20(1):128-34. PubMed ID: 23073720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Color grouping in space and time: evidence from negative color-based carryover effects in preview search.
    Braithwaite JJ; Humphreys GW; Hodsoll J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Aug; 29(4):758-78. PubMed ID: 12967220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Onset of background dynamic noise attenuates preview benefit in inefficient visual search.
    Osugi T; Murakami I
    Vision Res; 2015 Jul; 112():33-44. PubMed ID: 25976299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Attentional shift to the newer object in the successive and simultaneous distractors previewing search.
    Osugi T
    Vision Res; 2023 Aug; 209():108262. PubMed ID: 37210863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Temporal Binding and Segmentation in Visual Search: A Computational Neuroscience Analysis.
    Mavritsaki E; Humphreys G
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2016 Oct; 28(10):1553-67. PubMed ID: 27243617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The affective consequences of visual attention in preview search.
    Fenske MJ; Raymond JE; Kunar MA
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2004 Dec; 11(6):1055-61. PubMed ID: 15875975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Visual marking: the effects of irrelevant changes on preview search.
    Watson DG; Humphreys GW
    Percept Psychophys; 2005 Apr; 67(3):418-34. PubMed ID: 16119391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.