These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15495907)
1. Mandarin speech perception by ear and eye follows a universal principle. Chen TH; Massaro DW Percept Psychophys; 2004 Jul; 66(5):820-36. PubMed ID: 15495907 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cross-linguistic comparisons in the integration of visual and auditory speech. Massaro DW; Cohen MM; Smeele PM Mem Cognit; 1995 Jan; 23(1):113-31. PubMed ID: 7885260 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Similar frequency of the McGurk effect in large samples of native Mandarin Chinese and American English speakers. Magnotti JF; Basu Mallick D; Feng G; Zhou B; Zhou W; Beauchamp MS Exp Brain Res; 2015 Sep; 233(9):2581-6. PubMed ID: 26041554 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. CVC syllables for investigating the phonetic sensitivity of Mandarin and English speakers. Munro M Behav Res Methods; 2008 Feb; 40(1):147-53. PubMed ID: 18411537 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reassessing the electrophysiological evidence for categorical perception of Mandarin lexical tone: ERP evidence from native and naïve non-native Mandarin listeners. Gao YA; Toscano JC; Shih C; Tanner D Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Feb; 81(2):543-557. PubMed ID: 30378083 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Phonetic perceptual identification by native- and second-language speakers differentially activates brain regions involved with acoustic phonetic processing and those involved with articulatory-auditory/orosensory internal models. Callan DE; Jones JA; Callan AM; Akahane-Yamada R Neuroimage; 2004 Jul; 22(3):1182-94. PubMed ID: 15219590 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Developmental factors and the non-native speaker effect in auditory-visual speech perception. Chen Y; Hazan V J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Aug; 126(2):858-65. PubMed ID: 19640050 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Tone perception in Cantonese and Mandarin: a cross-linguistic comparison. Lee YS; Vakoch DA; Wurm LH J Psycholinguist Res; 1996 Sep; 25(5):527-42. PubMed ID: 8865624 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Perceptual assimilation of lexical tone: the roles of language experience and visual information. Reid A; Burnham D; Kasisopa B; Reilly R; Attina V; Rattanasone NX; Best CT Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Feb; 77(2):571-91. PubMed ID: 25465395 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Speech Recognition in Noise in Adults and Children Who Speak English or Chinese as Their First Language. Schafer EC; Aoyama K; Ho T; Castillo P; Conlin J; Jones J; Thompson S J Am Acad Audiol; 2018; 29(10):885-897. PubMed ID: 30479261 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Language specificity in speech perception: perception of Mandarin tones by native and nonnative listeners. Huang T; Johnson K Phonetica; 2010; 67(4):243-67. PubMed ID: 21525779 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The relationship between auditory-visual speech perception and language-specific speech perception at the onset of reading instruction in English-speaking children. Erdener D; Burnham D J Exp Child Psychol; 2013 Oct; 116(2):120-38. PubMed ID: 23773915 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Oscillatory phase shapes syllable perception. ten Oever S; Sack AT Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2015 Dec; 112(52):15833-7. PubMed ID: 26668393 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Underlying mechanism for categorical perception: tone-onset time and voice-onset time evidence of Hebrew voicing. Kishon-Rabin L; Rotshtein S; Taitelbaum R J Basic Clin Physiol Pharmacol; 2002; 13(2):117-34. PubMed ID: 16411426 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Audiovisual sentence recognition not predicted by susceptibility to the McGurk effect. Van Engen KJ; Xie Z; Chandrasekaran B Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Feb; 79(2):396-403. PubMed ID: 27921268 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A Causal Inference Model Explains Perception of the McGurk Effect and Other Incongruent Audiovisual Speech. Magnotti JF; Beauchamp MS PLoS Comput Biol; 2017 Feb; 13(2):e1005229. PubMed ID: 28207734 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Perception of asynchronous and conflicting visual and auditory speech. Massaro DW; Cohen MM; Smeele PM J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Sep; 100(3):1777-86. PubMed ID: 8817903 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Neural correlates of audiovisual speech processing in a second language. Barrós-Loscertales A; Ventura-Campos N; Visser M; Alsius A; Pallier C; Avila Rivera C; Soto-Faraco S Brain Lang; 2013 Sep; 126(3):253-62. PubMed ID: 23872285 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Human cortical encoding of pitch in tonal and non-tonal languages. Li Y; Tang C; Lu J; Wu J; Chang EF Nat Commun; 2021 Feb; 12(1):1161. PubMed ID: 33608548 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Universal Restrictions on Syllable Structure: Evidence From Mandarin Chinese. Zhao X; Berent I J Psycholinguist Res; 2016 Aug; 45(4):795-811. PubMed ID: 25980969 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]