These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

79 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1549674)

  • 1. Low-versus high-osmolality contrast media for intravenous use: a health care luxury or necessity?
    Powe NR
    Radiology; 1992 Apr; 183(1):21-2. PubMed ID: 1549674
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Prospective study of adverse reactions to contrast media administered intravenously--a comparison of low-osmolality and high-osmolality contrast media].
    Higashi S; Takizawa K; Suzuki S; Nagashima J; Tamura S; Ishikawa M; Obuchi M; Katayama M
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1988 Nov; 48(11):1364-70. PubMed ID: 3237463
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Nonionic low-osmolality versus ionic high-osmolality contrast material for intravenous use in patients perceived to be at high risk: randomized trial.
    Barrett BJ; Parfrey PS; McDonald JR; Hefferton DM; Reddy ER; McManamon PJ
    Radiology; 1992 Apr; 183(1):105-10. PubMed ID: 1549654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Noncompliance with guidelines for intravascular use of lower-osmolality contrast media.
    Damiani DR; Swanson DP; Hanwell LL
    Am J Hosp Pharm; 1993 Jun; 50(6):1204-6. PubMed ID: 8517462
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Safer contrast agents?
    Dawson P; Allison DJ
    Br J Hosp Med; 1989 Nov; 42(5):406-7. PubMed ID: 2597825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Intravenous contrast media: use and associated mortality.
    Cashman JD; McCredie J; Henry DA
    Med J Aust; 1991 Nov; 155(9):618-23. PubMed ID: 1943961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The use of contrast media.
    Baerlocher MO; Asch M; Myers A
    CMAJ; 2010 Apr; 182(7):697. PubMed ID: 20231343
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of patient responses to high- and low-osmolality contrast agents injected intravenously.
    Bagg MN; Horwitz TA; Bester L
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1986 Jul; 147(1):185-7. PubMed ID: 3487214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Nephrotoxicity of low osmolality contrast media versus high osmolality media.
    Steinberg EP; Moore RD; Brinker JA; Fishman EK; Powe NR; Graziano SL; Gopalan R
    Invest Radiol; 1991 Nov; 26 Suppl 1():S86; discussion S88-91. PubMed ID: 1808157
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Low osmolar (non-ionic) contrast media versus high osmolar (ionic) contrast media in intravenous urography and enhanced computerized tomography: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Wangsuphachart S
    Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health; 1991 Dec; 22(4):664-76. PubMed ID: 1820658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Decision analysis to assess cost-effectiveness of low-osmolality contrast medium for intravenous urography.
    Calvo MV; Pilar del Val M; Mar Alvarez M; Domínguez-Gil A
    Am J Hosp Pharm; 1992 Mar; 49(3):577-84. PubMed ID: 1598930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Liquid gold: low-osmolality contrast media.
    White RI; Halden WJ
    Radiology; 1986 May; 159(2):559-60. PubMed ID: 3515427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Low-osmolality versus high-osmolality contrast material.
    Korn WT; Bettmann MA
    Curr Opin Radiol; 1992 Apr; 4(2):9-15. PubMed ID: 1554592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Contrast-induced nephropathy: are there differences between low osmolar and iso-osmolar iodinated contrast media?
    Morcos SK
    Clin Radiol; 2009 May; 64(5):468-72. PubMed ID: 19348841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prediction of severe adverse reactions to ionic and nonionic contrast media in Japan: evaluation of pretesting. A report from the Japanese Committee on the Safety of Contrast Media.
    Yamaguchi K; Katayama H; Takashima T; Kozuka T; Seez P; Matsuura K
    Radiology; 1991 Feb; 178(2):363-7. PubMed ID: 1987594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Pulmonary edema in infants following injection of contrast media for urography.
    Wood BP; Smith WL
    Radiology; 1981 May; 139(2):377-9. PubMed ID: 7220883
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [The rate of adverse reactions to contrast media after double injections--correlation with the plasma histamine level].
    Tschakert H
    Rontgenpraxis; 1989 Apr; 42(4):107-11. PubMed ID: 2652339
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Results of randomized controlled trials of low-versus high-osmolality contrast media.
    Kinnison ML; Powe NR; Steinberg EP
    Radiology; 1989 Feb; 170(2):381-9. PubMed ID: 2643140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of contrast media osmolality on intravenous urographic quality.
    Lovett I; Benn I; Benness G; Doust B
    Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nuklearmed Erganzungsbd; 1989; 128():105-7. PubMed ID: 2568775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Electrolyte disturbances caused by intravenous contrast media.
    Hayakawa K; Maeda M; Mitsumori M; Torizuka T; Okuno Y; Tanaka F; Matsui A; Misaki T
    Radiat Med; 1992; 10(5):171-5. PubMed ID: 1438924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.