158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15496749)
1. Detecting item bias with the Rasch model.
Smith RM
J Appl Meas; 2004; 5(4):430-49. PubMed ID: 15496749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Rasch fit statistics as a test of the invariance of item parameter estimates.
Smith RM; Suh KK
J Appl Meas; 2003; 4(2):153-63. PubMed ID: 12748407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Item and rater analysis of constructed response items via the multi-faceted Rasch model.
Wolfe EW
J Appl Meas; 2009; 10(3):335-47. PubMed ID: 19671993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Detecting differential item functioning with five standardized item-fit indices in the Rasch model.
Seol H
J Outcome Meas; 1999; 3(3):233-47. PubMed ID: 10431491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The family approach to assessing fit in Rasch measurement.
Smith RM; Plackner C
J Appl Meas; 2009; 10(4):424-37. PubMed ID: 19934529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A critique of Rasch residual fit statistics.
Karabatsos G
J Appl Meas; 2000; 1(2):152-76. PubMed ID: 12029176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Local independence and residual covariance: a study of olympic figure skating ratings.
Linacre JM
J Appl Meas; 2009; 10(2):157-69. PubMed ID: 19564696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Random parameter structure and the testlet model: extension of the Rasch testlet model.
Paek I; Yon H; Wilson M; Kang T
J Appl Meas; 2009; 10(4):394-407. PubMed ID: 19934527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Stereotype threat and group differences in test performance: a question of measurement invariance.
Wicherts JM; Dolan CV; Hessen DJ
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2005 Nov; 89(5):696-716. PubMed ID: 16351363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evidence for the validity of a Rasch model technique for identifying differential item functioning.
Scheuneman JD; Subhiyah RG
J Outcome Meas; 1998; 2(1):33-42. PubMed ID: 9661730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessing DIF among small samples with separate calibration t and Mantel-Haenszel χ² statistics in the Rasch model.
Bernstein I; Samuels E; Woo A; Hagge SL
J Appl Meas; 2013; 14(4):389-99. PubMed ID: 24064579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Corrected Rasch asymptotic standard errors for person ability estimates.
Smith RM
J Outcome Meas; 1998; 2(4):351-64. PubMed ID: 9803720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of CTT and Rasch-based approaches for the analysis of longitudinal Patient Reported Outcomes.
Blanchin M; Hardouin JB; Le Neel T; Kubis G; Blanchard C; Mirallié E; Sébille V
Stat Med; 2011 Apr; 30(8):825-38. PubMed ID: 21432877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Bayesian item fit analysis for unidimensional item response theory models.
Sinharay S
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2006 Nov; 59(Pt 2):429-49. PubMed ID: 17067420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Unique properties of Rasch model item information functions.
Penfield RD
J Appl Meas; 2005; 6(4):355-65. PubMed ID: 16192660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Expected linking error resulting from item parameter drift among the common Items on Rasch calibrated tests.
Miller GE; Gesn PR; Rotou J
J Appl Meas; 2005; 6(1):48-56. PubMed ID: 15701943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Pseudolikelihood estimation of the Rasch model.
Smit A; Kelderman H
J Outcome Meas; 2000; 4(1):513-23. PubMed ID: 11272599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Identifying measurement disturbance effects using Rasch item fit statistics and the Logit Residual Index.
Mount RE; Schumacker RE
J Outcome Meas; 1998; 2(4):338-50. PubMed ID: 9803719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Why measurement matters for measuring patient vision outcomes.
Mallinson T
Optom Vis Sci; 2007 Aug; 84(8):675-82. PubMed ID: 17700332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of global testing procedures for item fit to the Rasch model.
Suárez-Falcón JC; Glas CA
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2003 May; 56(Pt 1):127-43. PubMed ID: 12803827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
