449 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15498896)
21. The effect of different adaptation strengths on image quality and radiation dose using Siemens Care Dose 4D.
Söderberg M; Gunnarsson M
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010; 139(1-3):173-9. PubMed ID: 20231163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparative study of image quality for MSCT and CBCT scanners for dentomaxillofacial radiology applications.
Loubele M; Maes F; Jacobs R; van Steenberghe D; White SC; Suetens P
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):222-6. PubMed ID: 18583372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Automatic Tube Potential Selection with Tube Current Modulation (APSCM) in coronary CT angiography: Comparison of image quality and radiation dose with conventional body mass index-based protocol.
Park YJ; Kim YJ; Lee JW; Kim HY; Hong YJ; Lee HJ; Hur J; Nam JE; Choi BW
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2012; 6(3):184-90. PubMed ID: 22551594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Comparison of angular and combined automatic tube current modulation techniques with constant tube current CT of the abdomen and pelvis.
Rizzo S; Kalra M; Schmidt B; Dalal T; Suess C; Flohr T; Blake M; Saini S
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Mar; 186(3):673-9. PubMed ID: 16498094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Multi-detector row CT: principles and practice for abdominal applications.
Saini S
Radiology; 2004 Nov; 233(2):323-7. PubMed ID: 15459326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Radiation dose and image quality in pediatric CT: effect of technical factors and phantom size and shape.
Siegel MJ; Schmidt B; Bradley D; Suess C; Hildebolt C
Radiology; 2004 Nov; 233(2):515-22. PubMed ID: 15358847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [Dose reduction in spiral-CT: detection of pulmonary coin lesions with and without anatomically adjusted modulation of tube current].
Greess H; Baum U; Wolf H; Lell M; Nömayr A; Schmidt B; Kalender WA; Bautz W
Rofo; 2001 May; 173(5):466-70. PubMed ID: 11414157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [CT: status on multi-detector row scanners!!!].
Martinez-Souloumiac L; Gosso F
J Radiol; 2006; 87(7-8):927-35. PubMed ID: 16888584
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Multi-detector row CT: radiation dose characteristics.
Hamberg LM; Rhea JT; Hunter GJ; Thrall JH
Radiology; 2003 Mar; 226(3):762-72. PubMed ID: 12616020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Dose performance of a 64-channel dual-source CT scanner.
McCollough CH; Primak AN; Saba O; Bruder H; Stierstorfer K; Raupach R; Suess C; Schmidt B; Ohnesorge BM; Flohr TG
Radiology; 2007 Jun; 243(3):775-84. PubMed ID: 17446525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. CT dose optimization when changing to CT multi-detector row technology.
Verdun FR; Gutierrez D; Schnyder P; Aroua A; Bochud F; Gudinchet F
Curr Probl Diagn Radiol; 2007; 36(4):176-84. PubMed ID: 17601537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Survey of conventional and spiral ct doses.
Hidajat N; Wolf M; Nunnemann A; Liersch P; Gebauer B; Teichgräber U; Schröder RJ; Felix R
Radiology; 2001 Feb; 218(2):395-401. PubMed ID: 11161152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Relationships between patient size, dose and image noise under automatic tube current modulation systems.
Sookpeng S; Martin CJ; Gentle DJ; Lopez-Gonzalez MR
J Radiol Prot; 2014 Mar; 34(1):103-23. PubMed ID: 24334678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Technical principles of dual source CT.
Petersilka M; Bruder H; Krauss B; Stierstorfer K; Flohr TG
Eur J Radiol; 2008 Dec; 68(3):362-8. PubMed ID: 18842371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Effect of x-ray tube parameters and iodine concentration on image quality and radiation dose in cerebral pediatric and adult CT angiography: a phantom study.
Papadakis AE; Perisinakis K; Raissaki M; Damilakis J
Invest Radiol; 2013 Apr; 48(4):192-9. PubMed ID: 23344518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. C-arm cone-beam CT: general principles and technical considerations for use in interventional radiology.
Orth RC; Wallace MJ; Kuo MD;
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2008 Jun; 19(6):814-20. PubMed ID: 18503894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Image noise and radiation dose using an automatic tube current modulation technique at 64-detector computed tomography: effect of off-center patient position, bowtie filter type, and scan projection radiograph.
Funama Y; Taguchi K; Awai K; Sakabe D; Shimamura M; Yamashita Y
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2009; 33(6):973-7. PubMed ID: 19940670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Efficient use of automatic exposure control systems in computed tomography requires correct patient positioning.
Gudjonsdottir J; Svensson JR; Campling S; Brennan PC; Jonsdottir B
Acta Radiol; 2009 Nov; 50(9):1035-41. PubMed ID: 19863414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Optimal use of AEC in CT: a literature review.
Gudjónsdóttir J; Ween B; Olsen DR
Radiol Technol; 2010; 81(4):309-17. PubMed ID: 20207787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Relating noise to image quality indicators in CT examinations with tube current modulation.
Solomon JB; Li X; Samei E
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Mar; 200(3):592-600. PubMed ID: 23436849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
