139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15499709)
1. Abortion laws in the states.
Oliver L
NCSL Legisbrief; 2004 Oct; 12(38):1-2. PubMed ID: 15499709
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Prenatal tort law and the personhood of the unborn child: a separate legal existence.
Roden GJ
St Thomas Law Rev; 2003; 16(1):207-86. PubMed ID: 16211760
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Consti-tortion: tort law as an end-run around abortion rights after Planned Parenthood v. Casey.
Stone AJ
Am Univ J Gend Soc Policy Law; 2000; 8(2):471-515. PubMed ID: 16594110
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Change of venue: abortion regulation in the states.
Rogers EH
Tex J Women Law; 1994; 3(1):123-33. PubMed ID: 12645607
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Abandonment and reconciliation: addressing political and common law objections to fetal homicide laws.
Curran DS
Duke Law J; 2009 Mar; 58(6):1107-42. PubMed ID: 19353836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Family law I: abortion.
Koscs ME
Annu Surv Am Law; 1984; 2():929-60. PubMed ID: 16086473
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Do fetal rights limit mothers' rights?
State Legis; 2002 Jun; 28(6):6. PubMed ID: 12051253
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Contemporary Australian abortion law: the description of a crime and the negation of a woman's right to abortion.
Rankin MJ
Monash Univ Law Rev; 2001; 27(2):229-52. PubMed ID: 16493805
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. State constitutional privacy rights post Webster--broader protection against abortion restrictions?
Ezzard MM
Denver Univ Law Rev; 1990; 67(3):401-19. PubMed ID: 15999439
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Mazurek v. Armstrong: should states be allowed to restrict the performance of abortions to licensed physicians only?
Bazzelle RY
Thurgood Marshall Law Rev; 1998; 24(1):149-82. PubMed ID: 16200693
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Fetal tissue research: state regulation of the donation of aborted fetuses without the consent of the "mother".
Seifert CA
John Marshall Law Rev; 1997; 31(1):277-98. PubMed ID: 16086513
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Journey through the courts: minors, abortion and the quest for reproductive fairness.
Ehrlich JS
Yale J Law Fem; 1998; 10(1):1-27. PubMed ID: 16596765
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. When the shouting has to stop: America and abortion.
Economist; 1992 Apr; 323(7756):15-6. PubMed ID: 16001469
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Informed consent laws and the constitution: balancing state interests with a physician's first amendment rights and a woman's due process rights.
Runels S
J Contemp Health Law Policy; 2009; 26(1):185-211. PubMed ID: 20112623
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Abortion legislation after Webster v. Reproductive Health Services: model statutes and commentaries.
Smolin DM
Cumberland Law Rev; 1989-1990; 20(1):71-163. PubMed ID: 15999438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The inapplicability of parental involvement laws to the distribution of mifepristone (RU-486) to minors.
Scuder AC
Am Univ J Gend Soc Policy Law; 2002; 10(3):711-41. PubMed ID: 16594112
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Parents, judges, and a minor's abortion decisions: third party participation and the evolution of a judicial alternative.
Green W
Akron Law Rev; 1983; 17(1):87-110. PubMed ID: 16086471
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Prenatal testing gone awry: the birth of a conflict of ethics and liability.
Ackmann EA
Indiana Health Law Rev; 2005; 2(1):199-224. PubMed ID: 17111503
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The Unborn Victims of Violence Act.
Maher DP
Ethics Medics; 2004 Oct; 29(10):1-3. PubMed ID: 15834998
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The economics of abortion access in the US: restrictions on government funding for abortion is the post-Roe battleground.
Fried MG
Conscience; 2005-2006; 26(4):11-5. PubMed ID: 16619422
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
