315 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15500311)
1. Measuring empathy: reliability and validity of the Empathy Quotient.
Lawrence EJ; Shaw P; Baker D; Baron-Cohen S; David AS
Psychol Med; 2004 Jul; 34(5):911-9. PubMed ID: 15500311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Validation of the Empathy Quotient (EQ) - Greek version.
Pehlivanidis A; Tasios K; Papanikolaou K; Douzenis A; Michopoulos I
Psychiatriki; 2021 Apr; 32(1):43-50. PubMed ID: 33759808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The Empathy Quotient: a cross-cultural comparison of the Italian version.
Preti A; Vellante M; Baron-Cohen S; Zucca G; Petretto DR; Masala C
Cogn Neuropsychiatry; 2011 Jan; 16(1):50-70. PubMed ID: 20737328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Chilean Version of the Empathy Quotient (EQ) Scale: Adaptation and Psychometric Properties.
Fernández AM; Baeza CG; Pavez P; Aldunate N
Span J Psychol; 2021 Apr; 24():e24. PubMed ID: 33827746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cross-cultural validation of the empathy quotient in a French-speaking sample.
Berthoz S; Wessa M; Kedia G; Wicker B; Grèzes J
Can J Psychiatry; 2008 Jul; 53(7):469-77. PubMed ID: 18674405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reliability and validity of the korean version of the empathy quotient scale.
Kim J; Lee SJ
Psychiatry Investig; 2010 Mar; 7(1):24-30. PubMed ID: 20396429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Validation of the Empathy Quotient in Mainland China.
Zhao Q; Neumann DL; Cao X; Baron-Cohen S; Sun X; Cao Y; Yan C; Wang Y; Shao L; Shum DHK
J Pers Assess; 2018; 100(3):333-342. PubMed ID: 28537758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Psychometric properties of the Polish adaptation of short form of the Empathy Quotient (EQ-Short).
Jankowiak-Siuda K; Kantor-Martynuska J; Siwy-Hudowska A; Śmieja M; Dobrołowicz-Konkol M; Zaraś-Wieczorek I; Siedler A
Psychiatr Pol; 2017 Aug; 51(4):719-734. PubMed ID: 28987060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the empathy quotient among Chinese minority college students.
Zhang Y; Xiang J; Wen J; Bian W; Sun L; Bai Z
Ann Gen Psychiatry; 2018; 17():38. PubMed ID: 30250492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Validation and extension of the Questionnaire of Cognitive and Affective Empathy in the Chinese setting.
Liang YS; Yang HX; Ma YT; Lui SSY; Cheung EFC; Wang Y; Chan RCK
Psych J; 2019 Dec; 8(4):439-448. PubMed ID: 30983167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reduced emotional empathy in adults with subclinical ADHD: evidence from the empathy and systemizing quotient.
Groen Y; den Heijer AE; Fuermaier ABM; Althaus M; Tucha O
Atten Defic Hyperact Disord; 2018 Jun; 10(2):141-150. PubMed ID: 28836147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Affective, sensory and empathic sharing of another's pain: The Empathy for Pain Scale.
Giummarra MJ; Fitzgibbon BM; Georgiou-Karistianis N; Beukelman M; Verdejo-Garcia A; Blumberg Z; Chou M; Gibson SJ
Eur J Pain; 2015 Jul; 19(6):807-16. PubMed ID: 25380353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Empathy and Systemizing Quotient: The Psychometric Properties of the Dutch Version and a Review of the Cross-Cultural Stability.
Groen Y; Fuermaier AB; Den Heijer AE; Tucha O; Althaus M
J Autism Dev Disord; 2015 Sep; 45(9):2848-64. PubMed ID: 25911303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The importance of offense characteristics, victimization history, hostility, and social desirability in assessing empathy of male adolescent sex offenders.
Curwen T
Sex Abuse; 2003 Oct; 15(4):347-64. PubMed ID: 14571539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The "Reading the Mind in the Eyes" test: systematic review of psychometric properties and a validation study in Italy.
Vellante M; Baron-Cohen S; Melis M; Marrone M; Petretto DR; Masala C; Preti A
Cogn Neuropsychiatry; 2013 Jul; 18(4):326-54. PubMed ID: 23106125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Empathy and enduring depersonalization: the role of self-related processes.
Lawrence EJ; Shaw P; Baker D; Patel M; Sierra-Siegert M; Medford N; David AS
Soc Neurosci; 2007; 2(3-4):292-306. PubMed ID: 18633820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Measuring empathy in couples: validity and reliability of the Interpersonal Reactivity Index for couples.
Péloquin K; Lafontaine MF
J Pers Assess; 2010 Mar; 92(2):146-57. PubMed ID: 20155564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Does oxytocin affect mind-reading? A replication study.
Radke S; de Bruijn ER
Psychoneuroendocrinology; 2015 Oct; 60():75-81. PubMed ID: 26142239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Physiological responses to dyadic interactions are influenced by neurotypical adults' levels of autistic and empathy traits.
Truzzi A; Setoh P; Shinohara K; Esposito G
Physiol Behav; 2016 Oct; 165():7-14. PubMed ID: 27371501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Empathy, Autistic Tendencies, and Systemizing Tendencies-Relationships Between Standard Self-Report Measures.
Sindermann C; Cooper A; Montag C
Front Psychiatry; 2019; 10():307. PubMed ID: 31143133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
