These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

397 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15500631)

  • 21. Monitoring of bioaerosol inhalation risks in different environments using a six-stage Andersen sampler and the PCR-DGGE method.
    Xu Z; Yao M
    Environ Monit Assess; 2013 May; 185(5):3993-4003. PubMed ID: 22955887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Evaluation of a novel personal nanoparticle sampler.
    Zhou Y; Irshad H; Tsai CJ; Hung SM; Cheng YS
    Environ Sci Process Impacts; 2014 Feb; 16(2):203-10. PubMed ID: 24337074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Chamber evaluation of a personal, bioaerosol cyclone sampler.
    Macher J; Chen B; Rao C
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2008 Nov; 5(11):702-12. PubMed ID: 18720289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Sampling of high amounts of bioaerosols using a high-volume electrostatic field sampler.
    Madsen AM; Sharma AK
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2008 Apr; 52(3):167-76. PubMed ID: 18326871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Development of an improved methodology to detect infectious airborne influenza virus using the NIOSH bioaerosol sampler.
    Cao G; Noti JD; Blachere FM; Lindsley WG; Beezhold DH
    J Environ Monit; 2011 Dec; 13(12):3321-8. PubMed ID: 21975583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Methodologies for quantifying culturable, viable, and total Legionella pneumophila in indoor air.
    Chang CW; Chou FC
    Indoor Air; 2011 Aug; 21(4):291-9. PubMed ID: 21198889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison of field performance of the Andersen N6 single stage and the SAS sampler for airborne fungal propagules.
    Bellin P; Schillinger J
    Indoor Air; 2001 Mar; 11(1):65-8. PubMed ID: 11235232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The biotest RCS air samplers in unidirectional flow.
    Ljungqvist B; Reinmüller B
    J Pharm Sci Technol; 1994; 48(1):41-4. PubMed ID: 8004418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A field comparison of four fungal aerosol sampling instruments: inter-sampler calibrations and caveats.
    Lee KS; Teschke K; Brauer M; Bartlett KH
    Indoor Air; 2004 Oct; 14(5):367-72. PubMed ID: 15330797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A portable vapor/particle sampler.
    Xiong JQ; Fang C; Cohen BS
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1998 Sep; 59(9):614-21. PubMed ID: 9778821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparison of wood-dust aerosol size-distributions collected by air samplers.
    Harper M; Akbar MZ; Andrew ME
    J Environ Monit; 2004 Jan; 6(1):18-22. PubMed ID: 14737465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Field testing of new aerosol sampling method with a porous curved surface as inlet.
    Hauck BC; Grinshpun SA; Reponen A; Reponen T; Willeke K; Bornschein RL
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1997 Oct; 58(10):713-9. PubMed ID: 9342831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Collection efficiencies of an electrostatic sampler with superhydrophobic surface for fungal bioaerosols.
    Han T; Nazarenko Y; Lioy PJ; Mainelis G
    Indoor Air; 2011 Apr; 21(2):110-20. PubMed ID: 21204982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Performance of Air-O-Cell, Burkard, and Button Samplers for total enumeration of airborne spores.
    Aizenberg V; Reponen T; Grinshpun SA; Willeke K
    AIHAJ; 2000; 61(6):855-64. PubMed ID: 11192220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The effect of filter material on bioaerosol collection of Bacillus subtilis spores used as a Bacillus anthracis simulant.
    Clark Burton N; Adhikari A; Grinshpun SA; Hornung R; Reponen T
    J Environ Monit; 2005 May; 7(5):475-80. PubMed ID: 15877169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Airborne viable, non-viable, and allergenic fungi in a rural agricultural area of India: a 2-year study at five outdoor sampling stations.
    Adhikari A; Sen MM; Gupta-Bhattacharya S; Chanda S
    Sci Total Environ; 2004 Jun; 326(1-3):123-41. PubMed ID: 15142771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Assessment of human exposure to airborne fungi in agricultural confinements: personal inhalable sampling versus stationary sampling.
    Adhikari A; Reponen T; Lee SA; Grinshpun SA
    Ann Agric Environ Med; 2004; 11(2):269-77. PubMed ID: 15627336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Development and evaluation of an inhalable bioaerosol manifold sampler.
    Gao P; Dillon HK; Farthing WE
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1997 Mar; 58(3):196-206. PubMed ID: 9075310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Assessment of electrical charge on airborne microorganisms by a new bioaerosol sampling method.
    Lee SA; Willeke K; Mainelis G; Adhikari A; Wang H; Reponen T; Grinshpun SA
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2004 Mar; 1(3):127-38. PubMed ID: 15204870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A high-flow portable biological aerosol trap (HighBioTrap) for rapid microbial detection.
    Chen H; Yao M
    J Aerosol Sci; 2018 Mar; 117():212-223. PubMed ID: 32372770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.