These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

516 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15500718)

  • 1. [Finite element analysis of changes in femoral stresses after elite total hip arthroplasty].
    He RX; Luo YM; Yan SG; Wu HB
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2004 Sep; 84(18):1549-53. PubMed ID: 15500718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Influence of proximal stem geometry and stem-cement interface characteristics on bone and cement stresses in femoral hip arthroplasty: finite element analysis].
    Massin P; Astoin E; Lavaste F
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2003 Apr; 89(2):134-43. PubMed ID: 12844057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Finite element modeling of resurfacing hip prosthesis: estimation of accuracy through experimental validation.
    Taddei F; Martelli S; Gill HS; Cristofolini L; Viceconti M
    J Biomech Eng; 2010 Feb; 132(2):021002. PubMed ID: 20370239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Biomechanics of the Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty.
    Ong KL; Kurtz SM; Manley MT; Rushton N; Mohammed NA; Field RE
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2006 Aug; 88(8):1110-5. PubMed ID: 16877617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Theoretical analysis of changes in femoral stresses after total hip arthroplasty].
    Yan S; Wu H; Yu S
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2006 Jun; 23(3):530-4. PubMed ID: 16856384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Role of loads and prosthesis material properties on the mechanics of the proximal femur after total hip arthroplasty.
    Cheal EJ; Spector M; Hayes WC
    J Orthop Res; 1992 May; 10(3):405-22. PubMed ID: 1569504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of changes in stem positioning on femoral loading after THR using a short-stemmed hip implant.
    Speirs AD; Heller MO; Taylor WR; Duda GN; Perka C
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2007 May; 22(4):431-9. PubMed ID: 17275151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Finite element analysis of a three-dimensional model of a proximal femur-cemented femoral THJR component construct: influence of assigned interface conditions on strain energy density.
    Lewis G; Duggineni R
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2006; 16(5):319-27. PubMed ID: 17075167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Study on design method for the individual anatomical hip joint endoprosthesis].
    Gong X; Kang L; Wang J
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Feb; 25(1):92-6. PubMed ID: 18435265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Changes in femur stress after hip resurfacing arthroplasty: response to physiological loads.
    Little JP; Taddei F; Viceconti M; Murray DW; Gill HS
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2007 May; 22(4):440-8. PubMed ID: 17257719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A method of quantification of stress shielding in the proximal femur using hierarchical computational modeling.
    Be'ery-Lipperman M; Gefen A
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2006 Feb; 9(1):35-44. PubMed ID: 16880155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of femoral prosthesis design on cement strain in cemented total hip arthroplasty.
    Peters CL; Bachus KN; Craig MA; Higginbotham TO
    J Arthroplasty; 2001 Feb; 16(2):216-24. PubMed ID: 11222897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Femoral strain changes after total hip arthroplasty--patient-specific finite element analyses 12 years after operation.
    Lengsfeld M; Burchard R; Günther D; Pressel T; Schmitt J; Leppek R; Griss P
    Med Eng Phys; 2005 Oct; 27(8):649-54. PubMed ID: 16139763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mesh morphing for finite element analysis of implant positioning in cementless total hip replacements.
    Bah MT; Nair PB; Browne M
    Med Eng Phys; 2009 Dec; 31(10):1235-43. PubMed ID: 19744873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The influence of design parameters on calcar stresses following femoral head arthroplasty.
    Cook SD; Klawitter JJ; Weinstein AM
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1980 Mar; 14(2):133-44. PubMed ID: 7358741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Design considerations for ceramic resurfaced femoral head: effect of interface characteristics on failure mechanisms.
    Pal B; Gupta S; New AM
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2010; 13(2):143-55. PubMed ID: 19787497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Three-dimensional finite element analysis of bone stress distribution around the hip joint prosthesis with stepped stem].
    Tan R; Fan H; Wu F; Chen J; Luo J; Zhang X
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2011 Aug; 28(4):732-6. PubMed ID: 21936371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Stress distribution on the femoral neck at different abduction angles of the hip joint: a finite element analysis].
    Zhang MC; Shi FL; Zhao WD; Ouyang J; Zhong SZ
    Di Yi Jun Yi Da Xue Xue Bao; 2005 Oct; 25(10):1244-6. PubMed ID: 16234099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Alterations in femoral strain following hip resurfacing and total hip replacement.
    Deuel CR; Jamali AA; Stover SM; Hazelwood SJ
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2009 Jan; 91(1):124-30. PubMed ID: 19092017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Strain adaptive bone remodelling: influence of the implantation technique.
    Behrens BA; Bouguecha A; Nolte I; Meyer-Lindenberg A; Stukenborg-Colsman C; Pressel T
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2008; 133():33-44. PubMed ID: 18376011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 26.