183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15500869)
1. Aiding decision making for baby Charlotte and baby Luke.
Lancet; 2004 Oct 23-29; 364(9444):1462. PubMed ID: 15500869
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Baby Ryan and virtual futility.
Capron AM
Hastings Cent Rep; 1995; 25(2):20-1. PubMed ID: 7782197
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Letting live, letting die.
Bull Med Ethics; 2004 Sep; (201):19-22. PubMed ID: 15685754
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Judge was wrong to insist doctors should give "burdensome" treatment to minimally conscious patient, court rules.
Dyer C
BMJ; 2013 Mar; 346():f1455. PubMed ID: 23460665
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The best interests test at the end of life on PICU: a plea for a family centred approach.
Inwald D
Arch Dis Child; 2008 Mar; 93(3):248-50. PubMed ID: 17932122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Easing the passing: end of life decisions and the Medical Treatment (Prevention of Euthanasia) Bill.
Morris A
Med Law Rev; 2000; 8(3):300-15. PubMed ID: 11885616
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. From the Johns Hopkins Baby to Baby Miller: what have we learned from four decades of reflection on neonatal cases?
Paris JJ; Ferranti J; Reardon F
J Clin Ethics; 2001; 12(3):207-14. PubMed ID: 11789063
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Conjoined twins: can the state mandate sacrifice surgery?
Stewart LM
Howard Law J; 2002; 45(3):675-96. PubMed ID: 15156890
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Incompetent patient (adult): Bland and the Human Rights Act 1998.
Med Law Rev; 2000; 8(3):342-9. PubMed ID: 11885617
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Appeal Court supports doctors' decision not to treat.
Dyer C
BMJ; 1992 Jun; 304(6841):1527-8. PubMed ID: 11643008
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Accepting the consequences of a treatment-refusal decision.
Moore DL
Bioeth Bull; 1995; 4(2):13-7. PubMed ID: 11822418
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Beyond the threshold of life. Treating and non-treating of critically ill newborns in The Netherlands.
Huibers AK
J Leg Med; 1995 Jun; 16(2):227-45. PubMed ID: 7636404
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Baby to be allowed a 'good death'.
Bull Med Ethics; 2004 Oct; (202):4-5. PubMed ID: 15685756
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Conjoined twins: the conflict between parents and the courts over the medical treatment of children.
Tierney H
Denver J Int Law Policy; 2002; 30(4):458-75. PubMed ID: 15233119
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Critically ill newborns and the law. The American experience.
Merrick JC
J Leg Med; 1995 Jun; 16(2):189-209. PubMed ID: 7636402
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Withdrawal of life sustaining treatment for child without parental consent. R. v. Portsmouth Hospitals N.H.S. Trust ex parte Glass.
Fennell P
Med Law Rev; 2000; 8(1):125-9. PubMed ID: 11787503
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. States taking a new look at end-of-life legislation; Schiavo case prompts flurry of activity.
Dewan S
N Y Times Web; 2005 Mar; ():A14. PubMed ID: 15838981
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Federal judge condemns intervention in Schiavo case.
Goodnough A; Yardley W
N Y Times Web; 2005 Mar; ():A14. PubMed ID: 15838982
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Child--medical treatment--court's inherent jurisdiction--treatment contrary to clinical judgment: Re J (a minor)(medical treatment).
Hutchesson P
New Law J; 1992 Aug; 142(6564):1123-4. PubMed ID: 16041878
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. International symposium on critically ill newborns. An overview and introduction.
Blank RH
J Leg Med; 1995 Jun; 16(2):183-8. PubMed ID: 7636401
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
