These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15501328)

  • 1. Porosity evaluation and pore size distribution of a novel directly placed ceramic restorative material.
    Geirsson J; Thompson JY; Bayne SC
    Dent Mater; 2004 Dec; 20(10):987-95. PubMed ID: 15501328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mechanical property characterization of a novel directly-placed ceramic restorative material.
    Geirsson J; Bayne SC; Swift EJ; Thompson JY
    Am J Dent; 2004 Dec; 17(6):417-21. PubMed ID: 15724753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of strength and adhesion of composite resin versus ceramic inlays in molars.
    Dejak B; Mlotkowski A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):131-40. PubMed ID: 18262014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Porcelain versus composite inlays/onlays: effects of mechanical loads on stress distribution, adhesion, and crown flexure.
    Magne P; Belser UC
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2003 Dec; 23(6):543-55. PubMed ID: 14703758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fracture load of composite resin and feldspathic all-ceramic CAD/CAM crowns.
    Attia A; Abdelaziz KM; Freitag S; Kern M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Feb; 95(2):117-23. PubMed ID: 16473085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. In vitro evaluation of push-out bond strength of direct ceramic inlays to tooth surface with fiber-reinforced composite at the interface.
    Cekic I; Ergun G; Uctasli S; Lassila LV
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 May; 97(5):271-8. PubMed ID: 17547945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. In vitro resistance to fracture of porcelain inlays bonded to tooth.
    Dietschi D; Maeder M; Meyer JM; Holz J
    Quintessence Int; 1990 Oct; 21(10):823-31. PubMed ID: 2082415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Transient thermal and stress analysis of maxillary second premolar tooth using an exact three-dimensional model.
    Hashemipour MA; Mohammadpour A; Nassab SA
    Indian J Dent Res; 2010; 21(2):158-64. PubMed ID: 20657080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Inhibition of demineralization adjacent to tooth-colored restorations in primary teeth after 2 in vitro challenges.
    Takeuti ML; Marquezan M; Rodrigues CR; Rodrigues Filho LE; Rocha Rde O
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2007; 74(3):209-14. PubMed ID: 18482516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison between regional micropush-out and microtensile bond strength of resin composite to dentin.
    Cekic-Nagas I; Ergun G; Nagas E; Tezvergil A; Vallittu PK; Lassila LV
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2008 Apr; 66(2):73-81. PubMed ID: 18446547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fracture resistance of amalgam/glass-polyalkenoate open sandwich Class II restorations: an in vitro study.
    Roberts HW; Vandewalle KS; Charlton DG; Berzins DW
    J Dent; 2008 Nov; 36(11):873-7. PubMed ID: 18692947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Microleakage of ceramic inlays luted with different resin cements and dentin adhesives.
    Uludag B; Ozturk O; Ozturk AN
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Oct; 102(4):235-41. PubMed ID: 19782826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influence of restorative technique on the biomechanical behavior of endodontically treated maxillary premolars. Part II: strain measurement and stress distribution.
    Soares PV; Santos-Filho PC; Gomide HA; Araujo CA; Martins LR; Soares CJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):114-22. PubMed ID: 18262012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Retention of zirconium oxide ceramic crowns with three types of cement.
    Palacios RP; Johnson GH; Phillips KM; Raigrodski AJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Aug; 96(2):104-14. PubMed ID: 16911887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of restorative material and proximal cavity design on the fracture resistance of MOD inlay restoration.
    Liu X; Fok A; Li H
    Dent Mater; 2014 Mar; 30(3):327-33. PubMed ID: 24424091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of internal adaptation in ceramic and composite resin inlays by silicon replica technique.
    Karakaya S; Sengun A; Ozer F
    J Oral Rehabil; 2005 Jun; 32(6):448-53. PubMed ID: 15899024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. In vitro evaluation of microleakage of indirect composite inlays cemented with four luting agents.
    Gerdolle DA; Mortier E; Loos-Ayav C; Jacquot B; Panighi MM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Jun; 93(6):563-70. PubMed ID: 15942618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of mouth-motion fatigue and thermal cycling on the marginal accuracy of partial coverage restorations made of various dental materials.
    Stappert CF; Chitmongkolsuk S; Silva NR; Att W; Strub JR
    Dent Mater; 2008 Sep; 24(9):1248-57. PubMed ID: 18395785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The influence of various conditioner agents on the interdiffusion zone and microleakage of a glass lonomer cement with a high viscosity in primary teeth.
    Yilmaz Y; Gurbuz T; Kocogullari ME
    Oper Dent; 2005; 30(1):105-12. PubMed ID: 15765965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Compressive strength of two newly developed glass-ionomer materials for use with the Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART) approach in class II cavities.
    Koenraads H; Van der Kroon G; Frencken JE
    Dent Mater; 2009 Apr; 25(4):551-6. PubMed ID: 19211138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.