BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

273 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15501338)

  • 1. Is biofilm accumulation on endoscope tubing a contributor to the failure of cleaning and decontamination?
    Pajkos A; Vickery K; Cossart Y
    J Hosp Infect; 2004 Nov; 58(3):224-9. PubMed ID: 15501338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of multiple cycles of contamination, detergent washing, and disinfection on the development of biofilm in endoscope tubing.
    Vickery K; Ngo QD; Zou J; Cossart YE
    Am J Infect Control; 2009 Aug; 37(6):470-5. PubMed ID: 19155094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Using an efficient biofilm detaching agent: an essential step for the improvement of endoscope reprocessing protocols.
    Marion K; Freney J; James G; Bergeron E; Renaud FN; Costerton JW
    J Hosp Infect; 2006 Oct; 64(2):136-42. PubMed ID: 16919846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Removal of biofilm from endoscopes: evaluation of detergent efficiency.
    Vickery K; Pajkos A; Cossart Y
    Am J Infect Control; 2004 May; 32(3):170-6. PubMed ID: 15153929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Correlation between the growth of bacterial biofilm in flexible endoscopes and endoscope reprocessing methods.
    Ren-Pei W; Hui-Jun X; Ke Q; Dong W; Xing N; Zhao-Shen L
    Am J Infect Control; 2014 Nov; 42(11):1203-6. PubMed ID: 25444266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Current limitations about the cleaning of luminal endoscopes.
    Hervé R; Keevil CW
    J Hosp Infect; 2013 Jan; 83(1):22-9. PubMed ID: 23098682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A prospective study of the efficacy of routine decontamination for gastrointestinal endoscopes and the risk factors for failure.
    Bisset L; Cossart YE; Selby W; West R; Catterson D; O'hara K; Vickery K
    Am J Infect Control; 2006 Jun; 34(5):274-80. PubMed ID: 16765205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Endoscope decontamination incidents in England 2003-2004.
    Gamble HP; Duckworth GJ; Ridgway GL
    J Hosp Infect; 2007 Dec; 67(4):350-4. PubMed ID: 18023923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Inconsistencies in endoscope-reprocessing and infection-control guidelines: the importance of endoscope drying.
    Muscarella LF
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2006 Sep; 101(9):2147-54. PubMed ID: 16968511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. In vitro modeling of dental water line contamination and decontamination.
    Spratt DA; Latif J; Montebugnoli LL; Wilson M
    FEMS Microbiol Lett; 2004 Jun; 235(2):363-7. PubMed ID: 15183886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Detection of persistent vegetative bacteria and amplified viral nucleic acid from in-use testing of gastrointestinal endoscopes.
    Deva AK; Vickery K; Zou J; West RH; Selby W; Benn RA; Harris JP; Cossart YE
    J Hosp Infect; 1998 Jun; 39(2):149-57. PubMed ID: 9651860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Electron microscopic examination of dental unit waterlines biofilm.
    Szymańska J
    Ann Agric Environ Med; 2005; 12(2):295-8. PubMed ID: 16457488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An evaluation of the use of chlorine dioxide (Tristel One-Shot) in an automated washer/disinfector (Medivator) fitted with a chlorine dioxide generator for decontamination of flexible endoscopes.
    Coates D
    J Hosp Infect; 2001 May; 48(1):55-65. PubMed ID: 11358471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mimicking disinfection and drying of biofilms in contaminated endoscopes.
    Kovaleva J; Degener JE; van der Mei HC
    J Hosp Infect; 2010 Dec; 76(4):345-50. PubMed ID: 20951470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Endoscopic decontamination: an audit and practical review.
    Ruddy M; Kibbler CC
    J Hosp Infect; 2002 Apr; 50(4):261-8. PubMed ID: 12014898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sporicidal activity of disinfectants as one possible cause for bacteria in patient-ready endoscopes.
    Miner N; Harris V; Ebron T; Cao TD
    Gastroenterol Nurs; 2007; 30(4):285-90. PubMed ID: 17724404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Government releases health advisory on endoscope reprocessing.
    Jt Comm Perspect; 2000; 20(1):8. PubMed ID: 11009957
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bacterial biofilm: a source of contamination in dental air-water syringes.
    Mayo JA; Oertling KM; Andrieu SC
    Clin Prev Dent; 1990; 12(2):13-20. PubMed ID: 2088622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Endoscope drying and its pitfalls.
    Kovaleva J
    J Hosp Infect; 2017 Dec; 97(4):319-328. PubMed ID: 28729139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Microbiological monitoring of endoscopes: 5-year review.
    Gillespie EE; Kotsanas D; Stuart RL
    J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2008 Jul; 23(7 Pt 1):1069-74. PubMed ID: 18086113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.