These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15502104)

  • 1. Interpreting method comparison studies by use of the bland-altman plot: reflecting the importance of sample size by incorporating confidence limits and predefined error limits in the graphic.
    Stöckl D; Rodríguez Cabaleiro D; Van Uytfanghe K; Thienpont LM
    Clin Chem; 2004 Nov; 50(11):2216-8. PubMed ID: 15502104
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Application of the Bland-Altman plot for interpretation of method-comparison studies: a critical investigation of its practice.
    Dewitte K; Fierens C; Stöckl D; Thienpont LM
    Clin Chem; 2002 May; 48(5):799-801; author reply 801-2. PubMed ID: 11978620
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Interpretation of statistics in clinical laboratory studies.
    Kay LW; Gebert MA
    Clin Lab Sci; 2006; 19(1):18-23. PubMed ID: 16617554
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Understanding Bland Altman analysis.
    Giavarina D
    Biochem Med (Zagreb); 2015; 25(2):141-51. PubMed ID: 26110027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Exact parametric confidence intervals for Bland-Altman limits of agreement.
    Carkeet A
    Optom Vis Sci; 2015 Mar; 92(3):e71-80. PubMed ID: 25650900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Confidence and coverage for Bland-Altman limits of agreement and their approximate confidence intervals.
    Carkeet A; Goh YT
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 May; 27(5):1559-1574. PubMed ID: 27587594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A Review of the Use of Confidence Intervals for Bland-Altman Limits of Agreement in Optometry and Vision Science.
    Carkeet A
    Optom Vis Sci; 2020 Jan; 97(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 31895271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Calculating reference intervals for laboratory measurements.
    Wright EM; Royston P
    Stat Methods Med Res; 1999 Jun; 8(2):93-112. PubMed ID: 10501648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Analytical method transfer: improving interpretability with ratio-based statistical approaches.
    Frömke C; Hothorn LA; Sczesny F; Onken J; Schneider M
    J Pharm Biomed Anal; 2013 Feb; 74():186-93. PubMed ID: 23245250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. How to regress and predict in a Bland-Altman plot? Review and contribution based on tolerance intervals and correlated-errors-in-variables models.
    Francq BG; Govaerts B
    Stat Med; 2016 Jun; 35(14):2328-58. PubMed ID: 26822948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sample Size for Assessing Agreement between Two Methods of Measurement by Bland-Altman Method.
    Lu MJ; Zhong WH; Liu YX; Miao HZ; Li YC; Ji MH
    Int J Biostat; 2016 Nov; 12(2):. PubMed ID: 27838682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Using Bland-Altman to assess agreement between two medical devices--don't forget the confidence intervals!
    Hamilton C; Stamey J
    J Clin Monit Comput; 2007 Dec; 21(6):331-3. PubMed ID: 17909978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reporting standards for Bland-Altman agreement analysis in laboratory research: a cross-sectional survey of current practice.
    Chhapola V; Kanwal SK; Brar R
    Ann Clin Biochem; 2015 May; 52(Pt 3):382-6. PubMed ID: 25214637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Measuring agreement in method comparison studies.
    Bland JM; Altman DG
    Stat Methods Med Res; 1999 Jun; 8(2):135-60. PubMed ID: 10501650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Importance of Predefined Rules and Prespecified Statistical Analyses: Do Not Abandon Significance.
    Ioannidis JPA
    JAMA; 2019 Jun; 321(21):2067-2068. PubMed ID: 30946431
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Adaptation of the robust method to large distributions of reference values: program modifications and comparison of alternative computational methods.
    Beasley CM; Crowe B; Nilsson M; Wu L; Tabbey R; Hietpas RT; Dean RA; Horn PS
    J Biopharm Stat; 2019; 29(3):516-528. PubMed ID: 30757951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Statistical control of the quality of clinical laboratory analyses (a lecture)].
    Balakhovskiĭ IS
    Klin Lab Diagn; 2009 Oct; (10):30-7. PubMed ID: 20000112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Lower confidence limits for critical systematic errors.
    Gernand W; Dumnicka P; Kuśnierz-Cabala B; Kapusta M; Solnica B
    Clin Biochem; 2007 Nov; 40(16-17):1317-20. PubMed ID: 17826756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Applying the right statistics: analyses of measurement studies.
    Bland JM; Altman DG
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Jul; 22(1):85-93. PubMed ID: 12858311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Typical error versus limits of agreement.
    Atkinson G; Nevill A
    Sports Med; 2000 Nov; 30(5):375-81. PubMed ID: 11103850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.