BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15502457)

  • 1. The impact of Pfannenstiel scars on TRAM flap complications.
    Dayhim F; Wilkins EG
    Ann Plast Surg; 2004 Nov; 53(5):432-5. PubMed ID: 15502457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Algorithmic approach to the design and harvest of abdominal flaps for microvascular breast reconstruction in patients with abdominal scars.
    Nykiel M; Hunter C; Lee GK
    Ann Plast Surg; 2015 May; 74 Suppl 1():S33-40. PubMed ID: 25875909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of obesity on flap and donor-site complications in free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap breast reconstruction.
    Chang DW; Wang B; Robb GL; Reece GP; Miller MJ; Evans GR; Langstein HN; Kroll SS
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2000 Apr; 105(5):1640-8. PubMed ID: 10809092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. TRAM flaps in patients with abdominal scars.
    Takeishi M; Shaw WW; Ahn CY; Borud LJ
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 1997 Mar; 99(3):713-22. PubMed ID: 9047191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An algorithmic approach to abdominal flap breast reconstruction in patients with pre-existing scars--results from a single surgeon's experience.
    Hsieh F; Kumiponjera D; Malata CM
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2009 Dec; 62(12):1650-60. PubMed ID: 19036659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Importance of right subcostal incisions in patients undergoing TRAM flap breast reconstruction.
    Losken A; Carlson GW; Jones GE; Culbertson JH; Schoemann M; Bostwick J
    Ann Plast Surg; 2002 Aug; 49(2):115-9. PubMed ID: 12187336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. DIEP flaps in women with abdominal scars: are complication rates affected?
    Parrett BM; Caterson SA; Tobias AM; Lee BT
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2008 May; 121(5):1527-1531. PubMed ID: 18453974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The efficacy of the surgical delay procedure in pedicle TRAM breast reconstruction.
    Atisha D; Alderman AK; Janiga T; Singal B; Wilkins EG
    Ann Plast Surg; 2009 Oct; 63(4):383-8. PubMed ID: 19770703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. DIEP and pedicled TRAM flaps: a comparison of outcomes.
    Garvey PB; Buchel EW; Pockaj BA; Casey WJ; Gray RJ; Hernández JL; Samson TD
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2006 May; 117(6):1711-9; discussion 1720-1. PubMed ID: 16651940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of Obesity on Postoperative Complications After Breast Reconstruction Using Free Muscle-Sparing Transverse Rectus Abdominis Myocutaneous, Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator, and Superficial Inferior Epigastric Artery Flap: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Lee KT; Mun GH
    Ann Plast Surg; 2016 May; 76(5):576-84. PubMed ID: 25536199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of smoking on complications in patients undergoing free TRAM flap breast reconstruction.
    Chang DW; Reece GP; Wang B; Robb GL; Miller MJ; Evans GR; Langstein HN; Kroll SS
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2000 Jun; 105(7):2374-80. PubMed ID: 10845289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Breast reconstruction with single-pedicle TRAM flap in breast cancer patients with low midline abdominal scar.
    Wu JD; Huang WH; Qiu SQ; He LF; Guo CP; Zhang YQ; Zhang F; Zhang GJ
    Sci Rep; 2016 Jul; 6():29580. PubMed ID: 27406872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Breast reconstruction with superficial inferior epigastric artery flaps: a prospective comparison with TRAM and DIEP flaps.
    Chevray PM
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2004 Oct; 114(5):1077-83; discussion 1084-5. PubMed ID: 15457015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The midabdominal TRAM flap for breast reconstruction in morbidly obese patients.
    Gabbay JS; Eby JB; Kulber DA
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2005 Mar; 115(3):764-70. PubMed ID: 15731676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Intraoperative vascular monitoring of ipsilateral vs. contralateral TRAM flaps.
    Clugston PA; Lennox PA; Thompson RP
    Ann Plast Surg; 1998 Dec; 41(6):623-8. PubMed ID: 9869135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Determinants of patient satisfaction in postmastectomy breast reconstruction.
    Alderman AK; Wilkins EG; Lowery JC; Kim M; Davis JA
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2000 Sep; 106(4):769-76. PubMed ID: 11007387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The "parasite" TRAM flap for autogenous tissue breast reconstruction in patients with vertical midabdominal scars.
    Berrino P; Casabona F; Adami M; Muggianu M
    Ann Plast Surg; 1999 Aug; 43(2):119-26. PubMed ID: 10454315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Outcomes of delayed abdominal-based autologous reconstruction versus latissimus dorsi flap plus implant reconstruction in previously irradiated patients.
    Levine SM; Patel N; Disa JJ
    Ann Plast Surg; 2012 Oct; 69(4):380-2. PubMed ID: 22964681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Choice of recipient vessels in delayed TRAM flap breast reconstruction after radiotherapy.
    Temple CL; Strom EA; Youssef A; Langstein HN
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2005 Jan; 115(1):105-13. PubMed ID: 15622239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ischemic complications in pedicle, free, and muscle sparing transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flaps for breast reconstruction.
    Andrades P; Fix RJ; Danilla S; Howell RE; Campbell WJ; De la Torre J; Vasconez LO
    Ann Plast Surg; 2008 May; 60(5):562-7. PubMed ID: 18434832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.