These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15502935)

  • 1. The effect of novelty on amphetamine self-administration in rats classified as high and low responders.
    Cain ME; Smith CM; Bardo MT
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2004 Nov; 176(2):129-38. PubMed ID: 15502935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Individual differences in amphetamine self-administration: the role of the central nucleus of the amygdala.
    Cain ME; Denehy ED; Bardo MT
    Neuropsychopharmacology; 2008 Apr; 33(5):1149-61. PubMed ID: 17568395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Individual differences in behavioral responses to novelty and amphetamine self-administration in male and female rats.
    Klebaur JE; Bevins RA; Segar TM; Bardo MT
    Behav Pharmacol; 2001 Jul; 12(4):267-75. PubMed ID: 11548112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Differential effects of novelty exposure on place preference conditioning to amphetamine and its oral consumption.
    Pelloux Y; Costentin J; Duterte-Boucher D
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2004 Jan; 171(3):277-85. PubMed ID: 12961061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Individual differences in the effect of novel environmental stimuli prior to amphetamine self-administration in rats (Rattus norvegicus).
    Cain ME; Dotson WF; Bardo MT
    Exp Clin Psychopharmacol; 2006 Aug; 14(3):389-401. PubMed ID: 16893281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Predisposition to self-administer amphetamine: the contribution of response to novelty and prior exposure to the drug.
    Pierre PJ; Vezina P
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1997 Feb; 129(3):277-84. PubMed ID: 9084067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Novelty seeking and drug use: contribution of an animal model.
    Cain ME; Saucier DA; Bardo MT
    Exp Clin Psychopharmacol; 2005 Nov; 13(4):367-75. PubMed ID: 16366767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The contribution of the central nucleus of the amygdala to individual differences in amphetamine-induced hyperactivity.
    Cain ME; Coolon RA; Gill MJ
    Behav Brain Res; 2009 Aug; 202(1):11-8. PubMed ID: 19447275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Environmental enrichment decreases intravenous self-administration of amphetamine in female and male rats.
    Bardo MT; Klebaur JE; Valone JM; Deaton C
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2001 May; 155(3):278-84. PubMed ID: 11432690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Factors that determine a propensity for cocaine-seeking behavior during abstinence in rats.
    Sutton MA; Karanian DA; Self DW
    Neuropsychopharmacology; 2000 Jun; 22(6):626-41. PubMed ID: 10788762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Age and sex differences in the locomotor effect of repeated methylphenidate in rats classified as high or low novelty responders.
    Wooters TE; Dwoskin LP; Bardo MT
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2006 Sep; 188(1):18-27. PubMed ID: 16896959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Exposure to novel environmental stimuli decreases amphetamine self-administration in rats.
    Klebaur JE; Phillips SB; Kelly TH; Bardo MT
    Exp Clin Psychopharmacol; 2001 Nov; 9(4):372-9. PubMed ID: 11764013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Environmental enrichment decreases intravenous amphetamine self-administration in rats: dose-response functions for fixed- and progressive-ratio schedules.
    Green TA; Gehrke BJ; Bardo MT
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2002 Aug; 162(4):373-8. PubMed ID: 12172690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of amphetamine on response inhibition in rats showing high or low response to novelty.
    Bardo MT; Cain ME; Bylica KE
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 2006 Sep; 85(1):98-104. PubMed ID: 16904737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Individual differences in rats' reactivity to novelty and the unconditioned and conditioned locomotor effects of methamphetamine.
    Bevins RA; Peterson JL
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 2004 Sep; 79(1):65-74. PubMed ID: 15388285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Contribution of impulsivity and novelty-seeking to the acquisition and maintenance of MDMA self-administration.
    Bird J; Schenk S
    Addict Biol; 2013 Jul; 18(4):654-64. PubMed ID: 22784256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Differences in locomotor response to an inescapable novel environment predict sensitivity to aversive effects of amphetamine.
    Kunin D; Gaskin S; Borjas MB; Smith BR; Amit Z
    Behav Pharmacol; 2001 Feb; 12(1):61-7. PubMed ID: 11270513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Strain differences in response to escapable and inescapable novel environments and their ability to predict amphetamine-induced locomotor activity.
    Miserendino MJ; Haile CN; Kosten TA
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2003 May; 167(3):281-90. PubMed ID: 12664191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effects of novelty-seeking phenotypes and sex differences on acquisition of cocaine self-administration in selectively bred High-Responder and Low-Responder rats.
    Davis BA; Clinton SM; Akil H; Becker JB
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 2008 Sep; 90(3):331-8. PubMed ID: 18445506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Genetics of novelty seeking, amphetamine self-administration and reinstatement using inbred rats.
    Meyer AC; Rahman S; Charnigo RJ; Dwoskin LP; Crabbe JC; Bardo MT
    Genes Brain Behav; 2010 Oct; 9(7):790-8. PubMed ID: 20618445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.