998 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15503323)
1. Magnetic resonance imaging of articular cartilage of the knee: comparison between fat-suppressed three-dimensional SPGR imaging, fat-suppressed FSE imaging, and fat-suppressed three-dimensional DEFT imaging, and correlation with arthroscopy.
Yoshioka H; Stevens K; Hargreaves BA; Steines D; Genovese M; Dillingham MF; Winalski CS; Lang P
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2004 Nov; 20(5):857-64. PubMed ID: 15503323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prospective comparison of 3D FIESTA versus fat-suppressed 3D SPGR MRI in evaluating knee cartilage lesions.
Li X; Yu C; Wu H; Daniel K; Hu D; Xia L; Pan C; Xu A; Hu J; Wang L; Peng W; Li F
Clin Radiol; 2009 Oct; 64(10):1000-8. PubMed ID: 19748006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of the articular cartilage of the knee joint with vastly undersampled isotropic projection reconstruction steady-state free precession imaging.
Kijowski R; Lu A; Block W; Grist T
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2006 Jul; 24(1):168-75. PubMed ID: 16758476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Fat-suppressed spoiled GRASS imaging of knee hyaline cartilage: technique optimization and comparison with conventional MR imaging.
Disler DG; Peters TL; Muscoreil SJ; Ratner LM; Wagle WA; Cousins JP; Rifkin MD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Oct; 163(4):887-92. PubMed ID: 8092029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Imaging of the articular cartilage in osteoarthritis of the knee joint: 3D spatial-spectral spoiled gradient-echo vs. fat-suppressed 3D spoiled gradient-echo MR imaging.
Yoshioka H; Alley M; Steines D; Stevens K; Rubesova E; Genovese M; Dillingham MF; Lang P
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2003 Jul; 18(1):66-71. PubMed ID: 12815641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Driven equilibrium magnetic resonance imaging of articular cartilage: initial clinical experience.
Gold GE; Fuller SE; Hargreaves BA; Stevens KJ; Beaulieu CF
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2005 Apr; 21(4):476-81. PubMed ID: 15779031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Detection of knee hyaline cartilage defects using fat-suppressed three-dimensional spoiled gradient-echo MR imaging: comparison with standard MR imaging and correlation with arthroscopy.
Disler DG; McCauley TR; Wirth CR; Fuchs MD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Aug; 165(2):377-82. PubMed ID: 7618561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Articular cartilage of knee: normal patterns at MR imaging that mimic disease in healthy subjects and patients with osteoarthritis.
Yoshioka H; Stevens K; Genovese M; Dillingham MF; Lang P
Radiology; 2004 Apr; 231(1):31-8. PubMed ID: 15068938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. MRI findings in injured articular cartilage of the knee correlated with surgical findings.
Li XM; Peng WJ; Wu H; Kacher D; Xia LM; Ai F; Li F; Xiong W
Chin Med J (Engl); 2009 Nov; 122(21):2624-30. PubMed ID: 19951582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Fat suppression gradient-echo magnetic resonance imaging of experimental articular cartilage lesions: comparison between phase-contrast method at 0.23T and chemical shift selective method at 1.5T.
Palosaari K; Ojala R; Blanco-Sequeiros R; Tervonen O
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2003 Aug; 18(2):225-31. PubMed ID: 12884336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of 3D vs. 2D fast spin echo imaging for evaluation of articular cartilage in the knee on a 3T system scientific research.
Milewski MD; Smitaman E; Moukaddam H; Katz LD; Essig DA; Medvecky MJ; Haims AH
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Jul; 81(7):1637-43. PubMed ID: 21683539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. MR imaging of knee cartilage with FEMR.
Vasnawala SS; Pauly JM; Nishimura DG; Gold GE
Skeletal Radiol; 2002 Oct; 31(10):574-80. PubMed ID: 12324826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Value of sagittal fat-suppressed proton-density fast-spin-echo of the knee joint as a limited protocol in evaluating internal knee derangements.
Khoury NJ; Mahfoud Z; Masrouha KZ; Elkattah R; Assaad T; Abdallah A; Hourani MH
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2011; 35(5):653-61. PubMed ID: 21926865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Fat-suppressed three-dimensional spoiled gradient-echo MR imaging of hyaline cartilage defects in the knee: comparison with standard MR imaging and arthroscopy.
Disler DG; McCauley TR; Kelman CG; Fuchs MD; Ratner LM; Wirth CR; Hospodar PP
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Jul; 167(1):127-32. PubMed ID: 8659356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of patellar chondromalacia with MR: comparison between T2-weighted FSE SPIR and GE MTC.
Macarini L; Perrone A; Murrone M; Marini S; Stefanelli M
Radiol Med; 2004 Sep; 108(3):159-71. PubMed ID: 15343130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Magnetic resonance imaging of knee cartilage using a water selective balanced steady-state free precession sequence.
Kornaat PR; Doornbos J; van der Molen AJ; Kloppenburg M; Nelissen RG; Hogendoorn PC; Bloem JL
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2004 Nov; 20(5):850-6. PubMed ID: 15503345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Isotropic 3-dimensional fast spin echo imaging versus standard 2-dimensional imaging at 3.0 T of the knee: artificial cartilage and meniscal lesions in a porcine model.
Ristow O; Stehling C; Krug R; Steinbach L; Sabo G; Ambekar A; Huber M; Link TM
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2010; 34(2):260-9. PubMed ID: 20351518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Differentiation between grade 3 and grade 4 articular cartilage defects of the knee: fat-suppressed proton density-weighted versus fat-suppressed three-dimensional gradient-echo MRI.
Lee SY; Jee WH; Kim SK; Koh IJ; Kim JM
Acta Radiol; 2010 May; 51(4):455-61. PubMed ID: 20350249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of cartilage surface injuries using 3D-double echo steady state (3D-DESS): effect of changing flip angle from 40° to 90°.
Moriya S; Miki Y; Kanagaki M; Yamamoto A; Okudaira S; Nakamura S; Yokobayashi T; Ishikawa M
Acta Radiol; 2011 Dec; 52(10):1138-42. PubMed ID: 22042983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Comparison between pig lumbar zypapophyseal joint cartilage acquired from multiple magnetic resonance image sequences and gross specimens].
Liao H; Yu W; Wang W; Liao Y
Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2010 Oct; 35(10):1064-72. PubMed ID: 21051831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
