BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

241 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1550501)

  • 1. Who referees the referees?
    Isbister WH
    Aust N Z J Surg; 1992 Mar; 62(3):173-4. PubMed ID: 1550501
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Confidentiality of referees.
    Case M
    Nature; 1996 Jan; 379(6563):292. PubMed ID: 8552169
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. How does peer review work?
    Aaron L
    Radiol Technol; 2008; 79(6):553-4. PubMed ID: 18650531
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Veterinary pathology and peer review.
    Cantor GH; Caswell JL; Crissman JW; Gillette DM; Gunson DE; Hogenesch H; Kiupel M; Mense MG; Miller MA; Rush LJ; Leger JA; Schoeb TR; Sellers RS; Sills RC; Swayne DE; Thomas HC; Ward JM; Alden CL
    Vet Pathol; 2009 Mar; 46(2):173-5. PubMed ID: 19261628
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Perfecting peer review?
    Nat Med; 2011 Jan; 17(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 21217648
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The discourteous reviewer.
    Leviton A
    Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol; 2007 Jan; 21(1):2-4. PubMed ID: 17239173
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Why and how articles are accepted or rejected for publication in biomedical journals].
    Trilla A
    Med Clin (Barc); 1990 Dec; 95(19):732-4. PubMed ID: 2087121
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Peer review and accountability.
    Hardy LK
    Can J Nurs Res; 1991; 23(2):1-5. PubMed ID: 1802369
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Enhancements in peer review of manuscripts by the Journal.
    Liesegang TJ
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2014 Jul; 158(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 24929824
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Tips for writing and publishing an article.
    Nahata MC
    Ann Pharmacother; 2008 Feb; 42(2):273-7. PubMed ID: 18212252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Each year more than 1,000 manuscripts are submitted for our consideration.
    Soc Sci Med; 1989; 29(7):I-II. PubMed ID: 2799420
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Open access under scrutiny.
    Samkange-Zeeb F; Zeeb H
    J Radiol Prot; 2013 Dec; 33(4):885-6. PubMed ID: 24285443
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Peer review and the fate of manuscripts.
    Frey JJ
    Fam Med; 1985; 17(1):3. PubMed ID: 3843084
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Heaven or hell: publishing and revision.
    Enns JT
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Feb; 38(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 22288698
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Conflict of interest. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors.
    Ann Intern Med; 1993 Apr; 118(8):646-7. PubMed ID: 8452334
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Art of Peer Review.
    Fraser D
    Neonatal Netw; 2018 Jul; 37(4):195-196. PubMed ID: 30567915
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Misconduct in medical-scientific publications].
    Manschot WA
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1995 Jan; 139(2):98. PubMed ID: 7838231
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Peering into the review process.
    Nat Struct Biol; 2000 Dec; 7(12):1075-6. PubMed ID: 11101879
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. More than 1000 new manuscripts in 2017.
    Glimelius B
    Acta Oncol; 2018 Feb; 57(2):174-175. PubMed ID: 29303398
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Peer Review of Scholarly Work.
    Brandon D; McGrath JM
    Adv Neonatal Care; 2018 Dec; 18(6):423-424. PubMed ID: 30499821
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.